Once again about the category of «luxury» in the economy and law of ancient Rome

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

In recent decades, Roman sumptuary laws have been actively studied in classical studies, which are traditionally associated with the theory of “decline of morals”: according to this theory, the crisis of the Roman state was caused by the process of decomposition of traditional norms and values under the influence of foreign morals, luxury and wealth. In this context, the relevance of the undertaken research is obvious. The author sets himself the goal of studying in detail the internally contradictory essence of such a phenomenon as Roman sumptuary laws. In particular, he draws attention to the conventional nature of the term “sumptuary laws” used in Russian-language literature, which does not accurately convey the meaning of the Latin phrase leges sumptuariae. The study draws on a range of Latin texts and other sources, as well as an extensive research literature. As a result, the author comes to the following conclusions: firstly, if the word luxus was associated with phenomena introduced into the life of the Roman civil community by the Hellenistic civilization and resulting from the military activity of Rome in the south of Italy and beyond, then the term sumptus was associated with the original Roman ideas about moderation and frugality, which must be considered, first of all, in the context of the life of the familia and its economic activities. Secondly, if the term luxus reflected the concept of luxury as such, then the use of the word sumptus was associated with housekeeping in general and with the concept of expenses in particular.

About the authors

Vladimir A. Kvashnin

Vologda State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: kvashninv195@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0931-6207
SPIN-code: 2609-5610

Dr. Habil. History, Professor of the Department of Law

15 Lenina St., Vologda, 160000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Kvashnin VA. Ob odnom paradokse rimskih zakonov o roskoshi [On One Paradox of Roman Laws on Luxury. Problems of history, philology, culture. 2017;(4):85–96. (In Russ.).
  2. Glare PGW. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford; 1968.
  3. Dvoretskii IH. Latinsko-ruskii slovar [Latin-Russian dictionary]. Мoskva; 1976. (In Russ.).
  4. Lyapustin BS. Economicheskoe razvitie drevnego Rima v svete zakona Oppiya o roskoshi [The economic development of ancient Rome in the light of Oppius’ Law on Luxury]. Iz istorii antichnogo obshchestva. Nizhny Novgorod; 1991, pp. 50–62.
  5. Bottiglieri A. La legislazione sul lusso nella Roma republicana. Napoli; 2002.
  6. Pais E. I pontifici, l΄agricoltura e l΄«anonna», «leges regiae» e «leges sumptuariae». In: Pais E. Ricerche sulla storia e sul diritto publico di Roma. I. Roma; 1915. P. 423–465.
  7. Gabba E. Del buon uso della ricchezza: Saggi di storia Economica e Sociale del Mondo Antico. Milano; 1988.
  8. Aubert J.-J. The Republican Economy and Roman Law: Regulation, Promotion or Reflection. In: H. Flower, editor. The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic. Cambridge; 2006. P. 160–178.
  9. Crawford M. The Roman Republic. Sussex (NJ); 1978.
  10. Millar F. The Political Character of the classical Roman Republic, 200–151 B.C. Journal of Roman Studies. 1984;(74):1–19.
  11. Sauerwein I. Die leges sumptuariae als romische Maßnahme gegen den Sittenverfall. Hamburg; 1970.
  12. Tûrk E. Macrobe et les «Nuits Attiques». Latomus. 1965; XXIV:381–406.
  13. Kuznetsova TI, Strelnikova IP. Oratorskoe iskustvo v drevnem Rime. Мoskva; 1976 (In Russ.).
  14. Fournier de Flaix E. La réforme de l’impôt en France. V. I. Paris; 1885.
  15. Baudrillart H. Histoire du luxe privé et public. T. III–IV. Paris; 1879–1880.
  16. Belkovskii G. Roskosh [Luxury]. Encyclopaedic Dictionary by F.A. Brockhaus and I.A. Efron. Spb., 1899. Т. XXVII (53). (In Russ.).
  17. Gruen ES. Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Berkeley-LA-London; 1996.
  18. Finley M. Studies in Land and Credit in Ancient Athens 500–200 B.C. Oxford; 1985.
  19. Finley M. The Ancient Economy. Berkeley-LA.; 1973.
  20. McGinn ThAJ. The Expressive Function of Law and the Lex Imperfecta. Roman Legal Tradition. 2015;(11):1–41.
  21. Baltrusch E. Regimen morum: Die Reglamentierung des Privatlebens der Senatoren und Ritter in der römischen Republik und frühen Kaiserzeit. München; 1989.

Copyright (c) 2024 Kvashnin V.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies