Email this article 
Laws and Obligations of the Landlords of the Sacral Land in Attica (IV Century B. C.)
- Authors: Bulycheva EV1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian State University for the Humanities
- Issue: Vol 9, No 4 (2017)
- Pages: 301-309
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/world-history/article/view/18026
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2017-9-4-301-309
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is devoted to legal aspects of leasing of sacred land in Attica - the rights and responsibilities of landlords. The object of the lease are temenos, which represent land plots with gardens and business premises owned by the temple. As a result, in the first place, perfomed demos and orgeones. The special duty of the landlords was to guarantee compliance with the legal side of the lease, the protection of the rights of the parties involved in the transaction. Landlords took care of the land in their possession. They had to ensure the timely payment of the special tax - eisphora. The main right was the control over observance of obligations on the part of tenants. In General, based on the study material, we can come to the conclusion that the relationship between the parties to the lease temenos in ancient Attica had a sound legal basis.
About the authors
E V Bulycheva
Russian State University for the Humanities
Author for correspondence.
Email: bulychevalena@yandex.ru
кандидат исторических наук, доцент кафедры всеобщей истории
6 Miusskaya square, Moscow, Russia, 125993References
- Andreev V.N. Atticheskoe obshestvennoe zemlevladenie. II // Vestnik drevnej istorii. М., 1972. № 4. S. 7–19.
- Buzeskul V.P. Istorija afinskoi demokratii. SPB.; Nauka, 2003.
- Bulycheva Е.V. Eisfora – voennyi nalog v mirnoe vremja (po dannym dogovorov ob arende obshestvennoi zemli v Attike v IV v. do n. e. Vestnik RGGU. Serija. Istoricheskie nauki. Vseobshaja istorija. М., 2014. № 13 (135). S. 15–23.
- Bulycheva Е.V. Ekonomicheskaja dejatel᾿nost orgeonov Attiki v IV v. do n. e. (po dannim dogovorov ob arende i prodazhe zemli // Vestnik Literaturnogo Instituta im. А.М. Gor᾿kogo. М., 2014.№ 3. S. 24–33.
- Vereshagin S.G. Politika nalogov v Drevnej Grecii. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki. М., 2006. № 1 (17). S. 6–16.
- Gvozdeva T.B. Malye Panafinei // Perspektivy «modernizacii» Rossii. Cennosti istinnye I mnimye: problema vybora – ot Dobroljubova do nashih dnej. N. Novgorod, 2002. S. 144–149.
- Gvozdeva T. B. Nagrady na Panafinejskih igrah (Perevod. Vstupitel᾿naja stat᾽ja I kommentarii) // Vestnik RUDN. M., 2013. № 3. S. 84–95.
- Gluskina L.М. Eisfora v Afinah v IV v. do n. e. // Vestnik drevnej istorii. М., 1961. № 2. S. 23–38.
- Gluskina L. M. Arenda zemli v Attike v IV v. do n.e. Vestnik drevnej istorii М., 1968. № 4. S. 42–58.
- Dj. Devis Demokratija i klassicheskaja Grecija. М.: ROSSTEN, 2004.
- Koshelenko G.А. Grecheskij polis i problemy razvitija ekonomiki // Antichnaja Grecija. М.: Nauka, 1983. Т. 1.
- Kudrjavtsev O.V. Ellinskie provincii Balkanskogo poluostrova vo II v. do n. e. M.: Nauka, 1954.
- Lenskaja V.S. Arhont-basilevs v Afinah. Vestnik drevnej istorii М., 2001. № 4. S. 126–141.
- Melanchenko I.V. Afinskaja demokratija. М.: KRAFT +, 2007.
- Jailenko V.P. Grecheskaja kolonizacija. М.: Nauka, 1982.
- Finley M. I. Land, debt and the man of property in classical Athens // Political Science Quartely. 1953. LXVIII. № 2.
- Jones A. H. The associations of the classical Athens. Oxford, 1991.
- Jones J. The law and legal theory of the Greeks. Cambridge, 1952.
- Lacey W.K. The family in Classical Greece. Ithaca, 1968.
- Littman R.I. Kinship in Athens // Ancient Society. Oxford, 1979. Vol. III. P. 10–31.
- Osborne R. The demos and the divisions in classical Athens // The Greek city from Homer to Alexander. Oxford, 1991. P. 245–270.
- Rosivach V. I. The system of public sacrifice in fourth century. Athens. Atlanta, 1994.
