Injection Technologies for Elimination of Karst-Suffosion Hazard and Soil Subsidence in the Foundation of Buildings and Structures

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

It is shown that the installation of cutoff walls (CW) using various drilling and injection technologies should be considered as the most effective method to protect against the development of karst-suffosion hazard during construction and operation of transportation and other structures. Depending on geotechnical and hydrogeological conditions at the future construction site, it is possible to use various mixtures based on polymers, liquid glass, etc., for CW construction and elimination of karst unconsolidation. It is shown that polymeric impregnation compositions are effective for the accelerated option of increasing the bearing capacity of soils, and the use of compositions based on liquid glass allows to increase biologic resistance. The use of jet grouting technology, collar technology or their combination is also effective. It is reasonable to use mineral-based special injection mixtures for compaction and hardening of karst rocks. These mineral-based special injection mixtures are more technologically advanced, and the soil cement of CW and compacted karst rocks is more durable compared to soil compacted with polymer-based or liquid glass injection mixtures. An effective injection mixture for CW installation for protection against karst-suffosion hazard is the “PFS+” injection mixture, which should be considered as an alternative to injection mixtures based on bentonite, polymers or liquid glass. Taking into account the high probability of sulfate corrosion development during injection of fractured gypsum rocks, the efficiency of application of mineral fine-dispersed binder - “Introcem” slag based microcement in collar technology - is shown. In order to eliminate karst unconsolidation, the most preferable approach is the use of the “ZIS” special injection mixture, which is made on the basis of mineral composite binder. The experience of using the “Super-Jet” technology under different geotechnical conditions and design solutions has shown that the strength of the soil cement body formed by this technology can reach 15 MPa, and the cutoff walls are fully waterproof. It is shown that higher strength of soil bases is achieved when they are injected with powder-activated compositions.

About the authors

Igor Ya. Kharchenko

Russian University of Transport

Email: iharcenko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-0521-9404

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Advisor of RAASN, Professor of Department of Bridges and Tunnels

Moscow, Russia

Alexey I. Kharchenko

JSC “Rossevzapzastroy”

Email: greenstone236@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3850-4285

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Director

Moscow, Russia

Alexander I. Panchenko

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University)

Email: alex250354@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-9538-6088
SPIN-code: 1223-1280

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Building Materials Science

Moscow, Russia

Vladimir T. Erofeev

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: erofeevvt@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8407-8144
SPIN-code: 4425-5045

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Academician of RAASN

Moscow, Russia

Ilizar T. Mirsayapov

Kazan State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

Email: mirsayapov1@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6193-0928
SPIN-code: 1454-1154

Corresponding Member of RAASN, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Foundations of Structural Dynamics and Engineering Geology

Kazan, Russia

Vadim G. Khozin

Kazan State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

Email: khozin.vadim@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0874-316X
SPIN-code: 3825-6514

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Technology of Building Materials, Products and Structures

Kazan, Russia

Oleg V. Tarakanov

Penza State University of Architecture and Construction

Email: tarov60@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1773-6095
SPIN-code: 5316-5749

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Territory Management

Penza, Russia

Evgeny V. Zavalishin

N.P. Ogarev Mordovia State University

Email: evaz@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-6956-6010
SPIN-code: 8036-3974

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Engineering and Computer Graphics

Saransk, Russia

References

  1. Ter-Martirosyan A.Z., Sobolev E.S. Operating safety of foundations of buildings and structures under dynamic impact. Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering. 2017;12(5):537–544. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.22227/19970935.2017.5.537–544
  2. Latypov A., Zharkova N., Ter-Martirosyan A. Calculation of the stress-strain state of soil massifs with karst-suffusion cavities. OP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018;365:042058. http://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/365/4/042058
  3. Glushkov A., Glushkov V., Glushkov I. Features of the construction of buildings in karst areas. E3S Web of Conferences. 2021;263:02043. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126302043.
  4. Kuzichkin O.R., Vasilyev G.S., Grecheneva A.V., Mikhaleva E.V., Baknin M.D., Surzhik D.I. Application of phasemetric compensation method for geoelectric control of near-surface geodynamic processes. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics. 2020;9(3):898–905. http://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v9i3.1727
  5. Anikeev A.V. Sinkholes and sinkholes in karst areas: formation mechanisms, prognosis and risk assessment. Moscow: RUDN University, 2017. (In Russ.) ISBN 978-5-209-07483-0
  6. Anikeev A.V. Sinkholes and subsidence of the Earth’s surface in karst areas: modeling and forecast: diss.. Candidate of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences. Moscow, 2014. (In Russ.)
  7. Kutepov V.M., Kozlyakova I.V., Anisimova N.G., Eremina O.N., Kozhevnikova I.A. Assessment of karst and karstsuffosion hazard in the project of large-scale geological mapping of moscow territory. Geoecology. Engineering Geology, hydrogeology, geocryology. 2011;(3):217–228. (In Russ.) EDN: NUIKPN
  8. Merkin V.E., Makovskiy L.V., Garber V.A. Design and construction of tunnels in karst soils. Moscow: TIMR Publ.; 1994. (In Russ.)
  9. Ragozin A.L., Elkin V.A. Regional assessment of karst hazard and risk. Problems of safety and emergency situations. 2003;(4):33–52. (In Russ.)
  10. Rodionov N.V. Karst of the European part of the USSR, the Urals and the Caucasus. Moscow: Gosgeoltekhizdat Publ.; 1963. (In Russ.)
  11. Savarensky I.A., Mironov N.A. Guidelines for engineering and geological surveys in karst development areas. Moscow: PNIIIS Gosstroy of Russia Publ.; 1995. (In Russ.)
  12. Tolmachev V.V. Probabilistic approach in assessing the sustainability of karst areas and designing anti-karst measures. Engineering geology. 1980;(3):98–107. (In Russ.) EDN: YKWQWZ
  13. Tolmachev V.V. On the permissible risks of construction in karst areas. Foundations, foundations and soil mechanics. 2007;(5):19–21. (In Russ.) EDN: SLBANV
  14. Tolmachev V.V. Methods for assessing karst hazards for construction purposes: state and prospects. Geoecology. Engineering geology, hydrogeology, geocryology. 2012;(4):354–363. (In Russ.) EDN: PFFQUD
  15. Tolmachev V.V., Reuter F. Engineering karst science. Moscow: Nedra Publ.; 1990. (In Russ.) ISBN: 5-247-01508-8
  16. Khomenko V.P. Patterns and forecast of suffusion processes. Moscow: GEOS Publ.; 2003. (In Russ.) ISBN: 5-89118-320-X
  17. Clayton C. Managing Geotechnical Risk: Improving productivity in UK building and construction. London, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1680/mgr.29675
  18. Robin F., Ho K., Lacasse S., Leroi E. A framework for landslide risk assessment and management. 2005. https://doi.org/ 10.1201/9781439833711-4
  19. Milanović P.T. Geological Engineering in Karst: dams, reservoirs, grouting, groundwater protection, water tapping, tunneling. Belgrade: Zebra Publ.; 2000.
  20. Kochev A.D., Chertkov L.G., Zaionts I.L. Methodology and results of a comprehensive study of karst-suffusion processes in Moscow. Engineering geology.1989;(6):77–94. (In Russ.)
  21. Tolmachev V., Leonenko M. Experience in collapse risk assessment of building on covered karst landscapes in Russia. In: van P. Beynen (ed.). Karst Management. Springer, Dordrecht; 2011. p. 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1207-2_4
  22. Panchenko A.I., Kharchenko I.Ya., Alekseev S.V. Micro-cement. Moscow: ASV Publ.; 2014. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978- 5-4323-0032-4
  23. Erofeev V.T., Rimshin V.I., Smirnov V.F. et al. Reinforced frame composites for buildings and structures. Saransk: Mordovian University Publ.; 2015. (In Russ.) ISBN 978-5-7103-3211-5
  24. Erofeev V., Rodin A., Rodina N., Kalashnikov V., Erofeeva I. Biocidal Binders for the Concretes of Unerground Constructions. Procedia Engineering. 2016;165:1448–1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.878
  25. Erofeev V.T., Zavalishin E.V., Rimshin V.I., Kurbatov V.L., Stepanovich M.B. Frame composites based on soluble glass. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2016;7(3):2506–2517. EDN: WVBBTP
  26. Maksimova I., Makridin N., Erofeev V., Barabanov D. Study of the Properties of Water-Hardened Cement Stone Depending on the Water-Cement Ratio and Age. Proceedings of IEEE 2020. EECE 2020. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Springer, Cham, 2021;150:192–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72404-7_20
  27. Panchenko A.I., Kharchenko I.Ya., Mirzojan M. Soil strengthening using fine composite binder based on carbide slurry. ICMTMTE 2020, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;971:032032. http://doi.org/10.1088/1757899X/971/3/032032
  28. Aimenov Z.T., Aimenov A.J., Yerofeev V.T., Sabitov L.S., Sanyagina Y.A. The effect of modifying additives on the performance properties of slag-alkali binders and concretes. International journal for computational civil and structural engineering. 2024;20(1):162–170. https://doi.org/10.22337/2587-9618-2024-20-1-162-170
  29. Kharchenko I.Ya., Alekseev V.A., Israfilov K.A., Beterbiev A.S.E. Modern technologies of cement grouting. Proceed- ings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering. 2017;5(104):552–558. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935. 2017.5.552-558
  30. Erofeev V., Bobryshev A., Lakhno A., Shafigullin L.N., Khalilov I., Sibgatullin K., Igtisamov R. Theoretical evaluation of rheological state of sand cement composite systems with polyoxyethylene additive using topological dynamics concept. Materials Science Forum. 2016;871:96–103. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.871.96
  31. Erofeev V.T., Vatin N.I., Maximova I.N., Tarakanov O.V., Sanyagina Y.A., Erofeeva I.V., Suzdaltsev O.V. Powderactivated concrete with a granular surface texture. International journal for computational civil and structural engineering. 2022;18(4):49–61. https://doi.org/10.22337/2587-9618-2022-18-4-49-61
  32. Travush V.I., Karpenko N.I., Erofeev V.T., Vatin N.I., Erofeeva I.V., Maksimova I.N., Kondrashchenko V.I., Kesarijskij A.G. Destruction of powder-activated concrete with fixation of destruction by a laser interferometer. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2020;95(3):42–48. https://doi.org/10.18720/MCE.95.4

Copyright (c) 2024 Kharchenko I.Y., Kharchenko A.I., Panchenko A.I., Erofeev V.T., Mirsayapov I.T., Khozin V.G., Tarakanov O.V., Zavalishin E.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies