Corporate culture of organization: Social capital management under challenges and risks

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The criteria for the analysis of the emotional-psychological state of the organization’s personnel imply the study of the capitalization of cultural values and the presentations of results in the form of mathematical indicators of the projective situation. In the article, corporate culture is considered through the capitalization of its team’s cultural values and its business reputation. The study is based on the metric data (parameters) of the capitalization of cultural values in the context of their application to assess the behavior and cultural ethos of the organization’s team. The object of the applied research was the collective of the private enterprise providing services in the fuel-energy sector; the authors examined the social factors in the formation of its corporate culture (the survey focused on the personnel and managers’ assessment of the social-psychological climate and was based on the quota sample consisting of 16 managers and 100 staff members). The results of the study allow to develop a technology for the effective management of corporate culture under new challenges and risks. Traditions of cooperation, trust and reciprocity were considered on the basis of the works of the classics of sociology. The authors suggested the criteria (parameters) for assessing social capital and social norms which reveal the personnel’s abilities and are developed by the organization in a certain period. The study showed discrepancies in the assessment of the parameters of corporate culture by managers and staff. Thus, managers attach great importance to such a parameter as the emotional-psychological state of the team, while the staff does not appreciate the mutual understanding of micro-groups and shows less emotional involvement. Such results confirm the problems in the management of corporate culture as social capital.

About the authors

F. I. Sharkov

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University); Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Author for correspondence.
Email: sharkov_felix@mail.ru
Prosp. Vernadskogo, 76, Moscow, 119454, Russia; Prosp. Vernadskogo, 84, Moscow, 119454, Russia

V. I. Gostenina

Ivan Petrovsky Bryansk State University

Email: v.gostenina@yandex.ru
Bezhitskaya St., 14-2, Bryansk, 241036, Russia

I. M. Loskutova

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Moscow State Pedagogical University

Email: im.loskutova@mpgu.su
Malaya Pirogovskaya St., 1-1, Moscow, 117997, Russia; Ostrovityanova St., 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia

E. Yu. Sycheva

Ivan Petrovsky Bryansk State University

Email: lupenkova@yandex.ru
Bezhitskaya St., 14-2, Bryansk, 241036, Russia

References

  1. Bazhin A.S., Ovchinnikov A.S., Svetaylo R.V. Vzaimosvyaz sotsialnogo kapitala i korporativnoy kultury predprinimatelskih organizatsiy [Relationship between social capital and corporate culture in entrepreneurial organizations]. Gumanitarnye i Sotsialnye Nauki. 2015; 3. (In Russ.).
  2. Belousova L.A. Korporativnaya solidarnost v kachestve sotsialnogo kapitala soobshchestva [Corporate solidarity as the community’s social capital]. Problemy Sovremennoy Nauki i Obrazovaniya. 2015; 10. (In Russ.).
  3. Bourdieu P. Formy kapitala [Forms of Capital]. Economic Sociology. 2002; 3 (5). (In Russ.).
  4. Vorontsov P.G. Sovremennye problemy korporativnogo upravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Contemporary issues of corporate governance in the Russian Federation]. Ekonomichesky Analiz: Teoriya i Praktika. 2015; 47. (In Russ.).
  5. Gostenina V.I. Sotsiolingvisticheskie kody sub`ekta vlasti v politicheskih kontentakh i v mass-media [Sociolinguistic codes of the subject of power in political contents and mass media]. Communicology. 2013; 2 (2). (In Russ.).
  6. Gostenina V.I., Kachalkov A.Yu., Shilina S.A. Upravlenchesky diskurs kak tekhnologiya sotsialnogo vzaimodeystviya sub`ekta vlasti i sotsiuma [Management discourse as a technology of social interaction between the subject of power and society]. Vlast. 2015; 8. (In Russ.).
  7. Gosudarstvenny kontrakt No. 1 ot 05.11.2020 “Monitoring i modelirovanie potrebnostey personala predpriyatiy Bryanskoy oblasti v professionalnom obuchenii kak instrumenty regulirovaniya lokalnogo rynka truda” [State Contract No. 1 of November 5, 2020 “Monitoring and modeling the needs of enterprises’ personnel in the Bryansk Region in the vocational training as tools for regulating the local labor market”]. (In Russ.).
  8. Gosudarstvenny kontrakt No. 34/21 ot 20.10.2021 “Korporativnaya kultura kak instrument motivatsii personala predpriyatiy na rynke truda Bryanskoy oblasti” [State contract No. 34/21 of October 20, 2021 “Corporate culture as a tool for motivating enterprises’ personnel in the labor market of the Bryansk Region”]. (In Russ.).
  9. Durkheim E. O razdelenii obshchestvennogo truda [The Division of Labor in Society]. Moscow; 1996. (In Russ.).
  10. Zemlyanukhina N.S., Pavlova I.D. Sotsialnoe partnerstvo kak element korporativnogo upravleniya [Social partnership as an element of corporate management]. Chelovechesky i proizvodstvenny potentsial rossiyskoy ekonomiki pered globalnymi i lokalnymi vyzovami. Saratov; 2017. (In Russ.).
  11. Zotov V.V., Prelikova E.A. Kapitalizatsiya kak protsess obobshchestvleniya sotsialnyh resursov individa [Capitalization as socialization of the individual social resources]. Communicology. 2019; 7 (4). (In Russ.).
  12. Igumnov O.A. Korporativnaya kultura kak faktor formirovaniya sotsialnogo kapitala organizatsii [Corporate culture as a factor in the formation of the organization’s social capital]. Sotsiologiya. 2019; 2. (In Russ.).
  13. Informatsionno-analiticheskoe rezyume po itogam obshchenatsionalnogo issledovaniya “Rossiyskaya povsednevnost v usloviyah krizisa: Kak zhivem i chto chuvstvuyem?”. IS RAN. Proekt No. 14-28-00218 [Information-analytical summary based on the results of the AllRussian study “Russian everyday life under the crisis: How do we live and what do we feel?”. IS RAS. Project No. 14-28-00218]. (In Russ.).
  14. Kolmykova M.A. Doverie kak element kultury organizatsii i sotsialnogo kapitala [Trust as an element of organizational culture and social capital]. Vestnik Samarskogo Munitsipalnogo Instituta Upravleniya. 2020; 2. (In Russ.).
  15. Kravchenko S.A. Sosushchestvovanie riskofobii i riskofilii — proyavlenie “normalnoy anomii” [The coexistence of risk-phobia and risk-philia is a manifestation of “normal anomie”]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2017; 2. (In Russ.).
  16. Lishchuk E.N., Kapelyuk S.D. Transformatsiya trebovaniy k chelovecheskomu kapitalu v usloviyah pandemii [Transformation of requirements for human capital under the pandemic]. Ekonomika truda. 2021; 8 (2). (In Russ.).
  17. Malinowski B. Izbrannoe: Dinamika kultury [The Dynamics of Culture]. Moscow–Saint Petersburg; 2015. (In Russ.).
  18. Paleeva O.L. Sotsiokulturnye osnovaniya obmena [Social-cultural foundations of exchange]. Vestnik Tambovskogo Universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye Nauki. 2010; 9. (In Russ.).
  19. Putnam R. Chtoby demokratiya srabotala: Grazhdanskie traditsii v sovremennoy Italii [Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy]. Moscow; 1996. (In Russ.).
  20. Popov V.D., Fedorov E.S. Kommunikativnye kody imidzha vlasti [Communicative Codes in the Image of Power]. Moscow; 2004. (In Russ.).
  21. Rezultaty issledovaniya vovlechennosti personala v rabotu kompanii “Rostelekom” [Results of the study of personnel engagement in “Rostelecom”. 2018. URL: https://ar2018.rostelecom. ru/ru/20/90/90. (In Russ.).
  22. Serebryakova G.V. Kapitalizatsiya otnosheniy v usloviyah tsennostnogo upravleniya [Capitalization of relations under the value management]. Vestnik Universiteta. 2016; 9. (In Russ.).
  23. Upravlenie — eto nauka i iskusstvo [Management is a Science and Art]. Sost. G.L. Podvoysky. Moscow; 1992. (In Russ.).
  24. Tezaurus sotsiologii. Tematichesky slovar-spravochnik [Thesaurus of Sociology. Thematic Dictionary–Reference Book]. Pod red. Zh.T. Toshchenko. Moscow; 2009. (In Russ.).
  25. Trotsuk I.V., Sukhoverova D.V. Korporativnaya kultura kak instrument povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti vuza [Corporate culture as a tool for improving university’s competitiveness]. Higher Education in Russia. 2018; 11. (In Russ.).
  26. Sharkov F.I. Konvergentsiya elementov politicheskogo mediaprostranstva [Convergence of elements of the political media space]. Political Studies. 2017; 3. (In Russ.).
  27. Sharkov F.I., Ponedelkov A.V., Vorontsov S.A. O problemah sovremennoy rossiyskoy politicheskoy elity i vozmozhnyh napravleniyah ih razresheniya [Challenges for today’s Russian political elite, and ways to address them]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2017; 17 (4). (In Russ.).
  28. Shevchenko S.Yu., Davydik O.I., Ilyushenko N.S., Petrov K.A. Rassinkhronizatsiya publichnogo i chastnogo: transformatsii biokapitalizma v kontekste pandemii [Desynchronization of public and private: Transformations of biocapitalism under the pandemic]. Chelovek. 2020; 31 (6). (In Russ.).
  29. Putnam R. The prosperous community. Social capital and public life. American Prospect. 1993; 4 (1).
  30. Kravchenko S.A. Increasing complex techno-digital realities in the dynamics of scientific discourse. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. 2019; 15 (4).
  31. Tyazhlov Ya., Kozhemyakin E. Teun van Dijk: About trends in discursive oppression. European nationalism and humanitarian nuclear bomb. Contemporary Discourse Analysis. 2013; 2.
  32. Wegren S., Nikulin A., Trotsuk I. Russian agriculture during Putin’s fourth term: A SWOT analysis. Post-Communist Economies. 2019; 31 (4).

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.


Copyright (c) 2023 Sharkov F.I., Gostenina V.I., Loskutova I.M., Sycheva E.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies