Idea of justice as a social trap for Russia

Abstract

This article is a result of its authors’ participation in the round table “Justice and Lawmaking” of the subproject “Ethics and Law: Mechanisms of Mutual Influence” of the HSE project “Applied Ethics” in the State Duma on December 1, 2021. The article considers social issues associated with the justice institutions, which are conditionally named institutional traps (an economic term). The authors focus on how these ‘traps’ work in contemporary Russia and how it is possible to get out of them. The article presents the contemporary discourse on social justice, which is characterized by a variety of concepts and a wide thematic field, and provides a definition of the institutional trap modified for the article’s tasks - a combination of social institutions, which being implemented leads to the results radically different or even opposite to the expected when designing such institutions. The authors argue that a trap is a result of the institution or a combination of institutions created to ensure justice of a certain kind or in accordance with a certain idea, when such an institution or combination leads to both justice (or other comparable public good) and clear injustice. This is a trap for society, because its expectations are deceived, and for the state, because it gets new social problems to be solved. The authors believe that what makes institutions an institutional trap is not only the fact that they do not cope with their tasks, but also do not meet social expectations determined by the system of previous values or inherited from it. The authors conclude that institutional solutions (creation of new institutions, modernization of existing ones) do not guarantee the desired result; we need a single educational program for promoting justice and mercy (taking into account cultural differences), which would explain their fundamental importance for society and its every member.

About the authors

A. Z. Chernyak

RUDN University

Email: cherniak_az@rudn.ru

кандидат философских наук, доцент кафедры социальной философии

Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia

M. L. Ivleva

RUDN University

Email: ivleva-ml@rudn.ru

доктор философских наук, заведующая кафедрой социальной философии

Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia

A. M. Orekhov

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: orekhov_am@rudn.ru

доктор философских наук, профессор кафедры социальной философии

Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia

References

  1. Aristotle. Politika [Politics]. Works in 4 vols. Vol. 4. Moscow; 1983. (In Russ.).
  2. Balastsky E.V. Institutsionalnye i tekhnologicheskie lovushki: analiz idey [Institutional and technological traps: Analysis of ideas]. Zhurnal Ekonomicheskoy Teorii. 2012; 2. (In Russ.).
  3. Budovich Yu.I., Budovich M.S. Razvitie issledovanij iz oblasti teorii institutsionalnyh lovushek i klassifikatsija lovushek [Development of research in the field of theory of institutional traps and classification of traps]. Vestnik Finansovogo Universiteta. 2013; 5. (In Russ.).
  4. Vernikov A.V. Konseptsiya institutsionalnyh lovushek: popytka primeneniya k analizu novogo insitituta [Concept of institutional traps: Application to the analysis of new institutions]. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.).
  5. Gaponenko S.S. Politicheskaya spravedlivost: stanovlenie ponjatiya [Political justice: Development of the concept]. Srednerussky Vestnik Obshchestvennyh Nauk. 2015; 1. (In Russ.).
  6. Hobbes T. Leviafan [Leviathan]. Moscow; 2001. (In Russ.).
  7. Ivleva M.L., Kurmeleva E.M., Rudanovskaya S.V. Chelovek i obschestvo v epohu sovremennosti [Person and society in the era of modernity]. Voprosy Filosofii. 2018; 4. (In Russ.).
  8. Kanarsh G.Yu. Spavedlivost [Justice]. Filosofskaya Antropologiya. 2018; 4 (1). (In Russ.).
  9. Kant I. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 1. Traktaty i pisma (1784-1796). Moscow; 1993. (In Russ.).
  10. Kashnikov B.N. Liberalnaja teoriya prava: praktika Rossii [Liberal Theory of Law: Russian Practice]. Viliky Novgorod; 2004. (In Russ.).
  11. Locke J. Dva traktata o pravlenii [Two Treatises on Government]. Moscow; 2009. (In Russ.).
  12. Macintyre A. Posle dobrodeteli: issledovaniya po teorii morali [After Virtue: Studies in Moral Theory]. Moscow–Ekaterinburg; 2000. (In Russ.).
  13. Nozick R. Anarkhiya, gosudarstvo i utopija [Anarchy, State and Utopia]. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.).
  14. Orekhov A.M. Spravedlivost kak bazisnyi printsip ustroistva obschestva [Justice as a basic principle of social organization]. Voprosy Filosofii. 2010; 9. (In Russ.).
  15. Plato. Gosudarstvo [State]. Saint Petersburg; 2005. (In Russ.).
  16. Polterovich V.M. Institutsiolanalnye lovushki i ekonomicheskie reformy [Institutional traps and economic reforms]. Ekonomika i Matematicheskie Metody. 1999; 35 (2). (In Russ.).
  17. “Pravda”: diskursy spravedlivosti v russkoj intellectualnoj istorii [“Truth”: Discourses of Justice in the Russian Intellectual History]. Moscow; 2011. (In Russ.).
  18. Prokofiev A.V. Vozdadim kajdomy dolzhnoe. Vvedenie v teoriyu spravedlivosti [Meting out Justice: Introduction to the Theory of Justice]. Moscow; 2013. (In Russ.).
  19. Prokofiev A.V. Spravedlivost i otvestevennost: sotsialno-eticheskie problemy v filosofii morali [Justice and Responsibility: Philosophical-Ethical Issues in Moral Philosophy]. Tula; 2006. (In Russ.).
  20. Prokofiev A.V. Chelovecheskaya priroda i sotsialnaja spravedlivost v sovremennom eticheskom aritotelianstve [Human nature and social justice in contemporary ethical Aristotelianism. Eticheskaya Mysl. 2001; 2. (In Russ.).
  21. Rawls J. Teoriya spravedlivosti [Theory of Justice]. Novosibirsk; 1995. (In Russ.).
  22. Sen A. Ideya spravedlivosti [The Idea of Justice]. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.).
  23. Trotsuk I. Kak vozmozhna sotsiologiya emotsiy i chto ona daet dlya ponimaniya schastja i spravedlivosti [How sociology of emotions is possible, and how it helps to understand happiness and justice]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2021; 21 (3). (In Russ.).
  24. Trotsuk I.V. Spravedlivost v sotsiologicheskom diskurse: semanticheskie, empiricheskie, istoricheskie i kontseptualnye poiski [Justice in sociological discourse: Semantic, empirical, historical, and conceptual challenges]. Russian Sociological Review. 2019; 18 (1). (In Russ.).
  25. Sztompka P. Spravedlovost [Justice]. Monitoring Obshchestvennogo Mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i Sotsialnye Peremeny. 2017; 6. (In Russ.).
  26. Chernyak А. Egalitarian distributive justice and reasoning luck. Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities; 2016.
  27. Do Quy-Toan. Institutional Trap. Policy Research Working Paper WPS 3291. Washington; 2004.
  28. Gradstein M. Institutional traps and economic growth. International Economic Review. 2008; 49 (3).
  29. Hatzis A. Greece’s institutional trap. Managerial and Decision Economics. 2018; 39 (8).
  30. North D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York; 1990.
  31. Nussbaum M. Beyond the social contract: Capabilities and global justice. The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism. G. Brock, H. Brighouse (Eds.). Cambridge; 2005.
  32. Nussbaum M.C. Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory. 1992; 20.

Copyright (c) 2022 Chernyak A.Z., Ivleva M.L., Orekhov A.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies