Motives, factors and consequences of the new type of village-city migration for the development of Russian settlement environment
- Authors: Vinogradskaya OY.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
- Issue: Vol 5, No 2 (2018)
- Pages: 178-189
- Section: Management of development of territories
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/public-administration/article/view/20574
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2018-5-2-178-189
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is devoted to the consideration of the phenomenon of moving to a remote rural area for the permanent residence of townspeople and constructing their own practices of life. Today there was an urgent need to study the deep bases of this phenomenon. It does not fit into the traditional explanatory schemes developed to date in the scientific literature, because such bases are usually located in some hidden, inner-being spheres, which are difficult to break into which is not easy both for external observers and for the bearers of the corresponding structures of consciousness. This double paradox complicates the distinct sociological interpretation of the motivational and ontological grounds that motivate townspeople to move to the village and settle firmly in it. It is assumed that the behavioral models of this social group are determined by the system of norms and expectations that appear in the course of updating the structures of mass consciousness, when, in particular, the future of the urban structure of society is actively rethinking. Of such kind research focus has not yet appeared in the composition of sociological actions. Comprehension of this phenomenon can help to answer the question: why all the efforts to artificially force the Russian peasantry to a happy life during the last century had catastrophic consequences for him, and how, taking into account this understanding, the prospects of the urban evolution of society can be built? A new look at this kind of problems should focus more on ontological foundations of processes that determine the life practices of «new villagers», which, unlike traditional practices, already lead to a socio-cultural transformation of rural communities.
About the authors
O Yakovlevna Vinogradskaya
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Author for correspondence.
Email: vgrape58@yandex.ru
-
82 Vernadsky pr., Moscow, 119571, RussiaReferences
- Akopyan N. (2005). Marginal’nost’ kak odna iz osnovnyh harakteristik transformiruyushchegosya obshchestva // 21-j vek. № 1. S. 150–165.
- Byhovskaya P. (2016). Daunshifting po-derevenski: Kak dachniki spasayut vymirayushchie derevni. URL: https://www.gazeta.ru/social/2016/05/29/8270759.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 22.06.2016).
- Velikij P.P. (2013). Neoothodnichestvo, ili Lishnie lyudi sovremennoj derevni, [v:] Toshchenko Zh.T. (otv. red.), Novye idei v sociologii. M.: YUNITI-DANA. S. 441–449.
- Vojnilov Yu., Mal’ceva D., Shubina L. (2016). Otkryvaya selo zanovo: issledovaniya sel’skih territorij, [v:] Pugacheva M.G. (red.), Vektory razvitiya sovremennoj Rossii. M.: Izdatel’skij dom «Delo» RANHiGS. S. 53–66.
- Demograficheskij ezhegodnik Rossii. 2017: Stat.sb. (2017) / Rosstat. M.
- Zhadnova E.V. (2013). Perspektivy issledovaniya rossijskoj derevni // Ehkonomika, sociologiya, pravo. S. 99–103. URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_21145466_ 24855935.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 04.09.2017).
- Zadorin I., Mal’ceva D., Homyakova A., Shubina L. (2014). Al’ternativnye sel’skie poseleniya v Rossii: stihijnaya vnutrennyaya ehmigraciya ili osoznannyj transfer v budushchee // Labirint. Zhurnal social’no-gumanitarnyh issledovanij. № 2. S. 64–77. URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_21980042_44437692.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 04.09.2017).
- Zvyagincev V.I., Neuvazhaeva M.A. (2015). Pereselency iz goroda v sel’skuyu mestnost’: fenomen «obratnoj migracii» v sovremennoj Rossii // Mir Rossii. T. 24. № 1. S. 101–135. URL: https://mirros.hse.ru/article/view/4945 (data obrashcheniya: 04.09.2017).
- Zdravoohranenie v Rossii. 2017: Stat.sb. (2017) / Rosstat. M.
- Zimmel’ G. (1994). CHelovek kak vrag // Sociologicheskij zhurnal. № 2. S. 114–119; Zimmel’ G. (2008). Ehkskurs o chuzhake / Per. A.F. Filippova // Sociologicheskaya teoriya: istoriya, sovremennost’, perspektivy. Al’manah zhurnala «Sociologicheskoe obozrenie». SPb.: Vladimir Dal’. S. 713.
- Merzlyakova V. (2008). Al’ternativnye modeli uspeshnosti v sovremennoj kul’ture: daunshifting // Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya. № 4 (96). S. 33–42.
- Obrazovanie v cifrah: 2017: kratkij statisticheskij sbornik (2017) / D.R. Borodina, L.M. Gohberg, O.B. Zhihareva i dr.; Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ehkonomiki». M.: NIU VSHEH.
- Park R.Eh. (1998). Kul’turnyj konflikt i marginal’nyj chelovek // Social’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Ser. 11. Sociologiya. № 2. S. 172–175.
- Pokrovskij N.E., Nefyodova T.G. (2013). «Kletochnaya globalizaciya» i novye tendencii v sel’skih soobshchestvah Blizhnego Severa Rossii, [v:] Toshchenko Zh.T. (otv. red.), Novye idei v sociologii. M.: YUNITI-DANA. S. 314338.
- Popova I.P. (1999). Novye marginal’nye gruppy v Rossijskom obshchestve (teoreticheskie aspekty issledovaniya) // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. № 7. S. 62–71.
- Steshin D., Gusejnov V. (2016). Pskovskie robinzony: Gorozhane pobezhali iz betonnyh trushchob, zaselyaya zemlyu russkuyu zanovo. URL: http://www.msk.kp.ru/daily/ 26543/3560275/ (data obrashcheniya: 22.06.2016).
- Filosofiya: Ehnciklopedicheskij slovar’. (2004). M.: Gardariki. Pod redakciej A.A. Ivina. URL: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/968/%D0%9F%D0%A0%D0%9 0%D0%9A%D0%A2%D0%98%D0%9A%D0%90 (data obrashcheniya: 03.06.2018).
- Shyuc A. (2004). Chuzhak: Social’no-psihologicheskij ocherk / Izbrannoe: Mir, svetyashchijsya smyslom / Per. s nem. i angl. M.: «Rossijskaya politicheskaya ehnciklopediya» (ROSSPEHN), 2004. S. 533–549.
- Chapuis R., Brossard T. (1989). The Demographic Evolution of Rural France (1968– 1982) // Journal of Rural Studies. V. 5 (4).
- Kayser B. (1990). La Renaissance Rurale: Sociologie des Campagnes du Monde Occidental. Paris: Armand Colin; Mahajan S. Rurbanization.
- Stonequist E. V. (1961). The marginal man. A study in Personality and Culture Conflict, N.Y.