ЗАДАТКИ, ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ И СПОСОБНОСТИ: ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ ПОДХОДОВ К ИССЛЕДОВАНИЮ ТВОРЧЕСКИХ ПРОЦЕССОВ У ЧЕЛОВЕКА И ЖИВОТНЫХ

Обложка

Цитировать

Полный текст

Аннотация

При всех различиях в изучении творческих и инновационных процессов у животных и человека существует и определенное сходство, которое можно лучше понять при интеграции обоих подходов. Оба подхода направлены на изучение творческих способностей, но исследователи животных предпочитают концепцию творческих задатков, а исследователи человека - творческого потенциала. В статье рассмотрены следствия, вытекающие из различий в исследовательских подходах, а также то, чем данные подходы могут обогатить друг друга.На основании обзора литературы по проблеме исследования творческих процессов у человека и животных выявлены основные положения, которые позволяют исследователям человека показать путь от возможностей (потенциала) к способностям, а исследователям животных - от задатков к способностям. Исследователи животных уже рассматривают индивидуальные различия между ними и, как результат, показывают, как возможности могут опосредовать связь между задатками и способностями. Если работа в этом направлении будет продолжена, то может быть выявлено то, каким образом индивидуальные различия связаны с высокими творческими и инновационными проявлениями.

Об авторах

Джеймс К Кауфман

Коннектикутский университет

Автор, ответственный за переписку.
Email: psyj@rudn.university
2131 Hillside Road, Storrs, CT 06269-3007, USA

Эллисон Б Кауфман

Коннектикутский университет

Email: psyj@rudn.university
1084 Shennecossett Rd., Groton, CT 06340, USA

Список литературы

  1. Amabile T.M., Goldfarb P. & Brackfield S.C. Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal, 1990, vol. 3, pp. 6-21.
  2. Amabile T.M., Schatzel E.A., Moneta G.B. & Kramer S.J. Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 2004, vol. 15, pp. 5-32.
  3. Baer J. & Kaufman J.C. Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of creativity. Roeper Review, 2005, vol. 27, pp. 158-163.
  4. Beghetto R.A. & Kaufman J.C. Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2007, vol. 1, pp. 13-79.
  5. Beghetto R.A., Kaufman J.C. & Baer J. Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. New York: Teachers College Press, 2014.
  6. Benson-Amram S. & Holekamp K.E. Innovative problem solving by wild spotted hyenas.Proceedings. Biological Sciences / The Royal Society, 2012. vol. 279, pp. 4087-95.
  7. Bókony V., Lendvai Á.Z., Vágási C.I., Pǎtraş L., Pap P.L., Németh J., … Liker A. Necessity or capacity? Physiological state predicts problem-solving performance in house sparrows. Behavioral Ecology, (2014), vol. 25, pp. 124-135.
  8. Burghardt G. A brief glimpse at the long evolutionary history of play. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 90-98.
  9. Chamove A.S., Eysenck H.J. & Harlow H.F. Personality in monkeys: Factor analyses of Rhesus social behavior. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, vol. 24, pp. 496-504.
  10. Cussen V.A. & Mench J.A. Personality predicts cognitive bias in captive psittacines, Amazona amazonica. Animal Behaviour, 2014, vol. 89, pp. 123-130.
  11. Dingemanse N.J. & R ale D. Natural selection and animal personality. Behaviour, 2005, vol. 142, pp. 1159-1184.
  12. Eskelinen H.C., Winship K.A, & Borger-turner J.L. Sex, age, and individual differences in Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in response to environmental enrichment, Animal Behavior and Cognition, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 241-253.
  13. Feist G.J. A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1998, vol. 2, pp. 290-309.
  14. Feist G.J. The function of personality in creativity: The nature and nurture of the creative personality. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 113-130.
  15. Forgeard M.J.C. & Kaufman J.C. Who cares about imagination, creativity, and innovation, and why? A review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2016, vol. 10, pp. 250-269.
  16. Forgeard M.J.C. & Mecklenburg A.C. The two dimensions of motivation and a reciprocal model of the creative process. Review of General Psychology, 2013, vol. 17, pp. 255-266.
  17. Garamszegi L.Z., Eens M., Török J. & Tregenza T. Birds reveal their personality when singing.PLoS ONE, 2008, vol. 3, e2647.
  18. Gosling S.D. From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research?Psychological Bulletin, 2001, vol. 127, pp. 45-86.
  19. Gardner H. Creating minds. New York: Basic Books, 1993.
  20. Grinsted L., Pruitt J.N., Settepani V. & Bilde T. Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider. Proceedings. Biological Sciences / The Royal Society, 2013, vol. 280, pp. 2013-1407.
  21. Gruber H.E. & Wallace D.B. Creative work: The case of Charles Darwin. American Psychologist, 2001, vol. 56, pp. 346-349.
  22. Haldane J.B.S. The cost of natural selection. Journal of Genetics, 1957, vol. 55, pp. 511-524.
  23. Hegarty C.B. & Plucker J.A. Self-expression in creative leisure. International Journal of Creativityand Problem Solving, 2012, vol. 22, pp. 63-78.
  24. Hennessey B.A. If I were Secretary of Education: A focus on intrinsic motivation and creativity in the classroom. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2015, vol. 9, pp. 187-192.
  25. Hennessey B.A. & Amabile T.M. Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 2010, vol. 61, pp. 569-598.
  26. Hergovich A., Mauerer I. & Riemer V. Exotic animal companions and the personality of their owners. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, 2011, vol. 24, pp. 317-327.
  27. Herrmann E. & Call J. Are there geniuses among the apes? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 2012, vol. 367, pp. 2753-61.
  28. Highfill L.E. & Kuczaj S.A. Do bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) have distinct and stable personalities? Aquatic Mammals, 2007, vol. 33, pp. 380-389.
  29. Highfill L.E. & Kuczaj S.A. How studies of wild and aptive dolphins contribute to our understanding of individual differences and personality. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2010, vol. 23, pp. 269-277.
  30. Holbrook C.T., Wright C.M. & Pruitt J.N. Individual differences in personality and behavioural plasticity facilitate division of labour in social spider colonies. Animal Behaviour, 2014, vol. 97, pp. 177-183.
  31. Jauk E., Benedek M., Dunst B. & Neubauer A.C. The relationship between intelligence and creativity: new support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 2013, vol. 41, pp. 212-221.
  32. Karwowski M. & Lebuda I. The big five, the huge two, and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and The Arts, 2016, vol. 10, pp. 214-232.
  33. Kaufman A.B., Butt A.B., Colbert-White E.N. & Kaufman J.C. Towards a neurobiological model of creativity in nonhuman animals. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2011, vol. 125, pp. 255-272.
  34. Kaufman J.C. Creativity 101 (2nd Edition). New York: Springer, 2016.
  35. Kaufman J.C. & Baer J. The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of creativity. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 2004, vol. 14, pp. 15-25.
  36. Kaufman J.C. & Beghetto R.A. Beyond big and little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 2009, vol. 13, pp. 1-12.
  37. Kaufman J.C. & Kaufman A.B. Applying a creativity framework to animal cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 2004, vol. 22, pp. 143-155.
  38. Kawai M. Newly-acquired pre-cultural behavior of the natural troop of Japanese monkeys on Koshima islet. Primates, 1965, vol. 6, pp. 1-30.
  39. Kralj-Fi er S. & Schneider J.M. Individual behavioural consistency and plasticity in an urban spider. Animal Behaviour, 2012, vol. 84, pp. 197-204.
  40. Kuczaj S.A., Highfill L. & Byerly H. The importance of considering context in the assessment of personality characteristics: Evidence from ratings of dolphin personality. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2012, vol. 25, pp. 309-329.
  41. Kummer H. & Goodall J. Conditions of Innovative Behaviour in Primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 1985, vol. 308, pp. 203-214.
  42. Lloyd E. Kanzi, evolution, and language. Biology & Philosophy, 2004, vol. 19, pp. 577-588.
  43. Maslow A. Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper, 1954.
  44. Pepperberg I.M. The Alex studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
  45. Pepperberg I.M. Cognitive and communicative abilities of Grey parrots. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2006, vol. 100, pp. 77-86.
  46. Pepperberg I.M. Grey parrots do not always “parrot”: the roles of imitation and phonological awareness in the creation of new labels from existing vocalizations. Language Sciences, 2007, vol. 29, pp. 1-13.
  47. Pepperberg I.M. Further evidence for addition and numerical competence by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Animal Cognition, 2012, 711-717.
  48. Ramsey G., Bastian M.L. & van Schaik C. Animal innovation defined and operationalized. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2007, vol. 30, pp. 393-407.
  49. Reader S.M. & Laland K.N. Animal innovation: An introduction. In S.M. Reader & K.N. Laland (Eds.), Animal Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 3-38.
  50. Russ S.W. & Fiorelli J.A. Developmental approaches to creativity. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 233-249.
  51. Russ S.W. & Wallace C.E. Pretend play and creative processes. American Journal of Play, 2013, vol. 6, pp. 136-148.
  52. Sanderson J.L., Stott I., Young A.J., Vitikainen E.I.K., Hodge S.J. & Cant M.A. The origins of consistent individual differences in cooperation in wild banded mongooses, Mungos mungo. Animal Behaviour, 2015, vol. 107, pp. 193-200.
  53. Savage-Rumbaugh E.S. & Lewin R. Kanzi: The ape at the brink of the human mind. New York: Wiley and Sons, 1994.
  54. Simonton D.K. Genius 101. New York: Springer, 2009.
  55. Torrance E.P. Education and the creative potential. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1963.
  56. Triana E. & Pasnak R. Object permanence in cats and dogs. Learning & Behavior, 1981, vol. 9, pp. 135-139.
  57. Vonk J. & Povinelli D. Individual differences in long-term cognitive testing in a group of captive chimpanzees. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2011, vol. 24, pp. 137-167.
  58. Webb C.E., Franks B., Romero T., Higgins E.T. & de Waal F.B.M. Individual differences in chimpanzee reconciliation relate to social switching behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 2014, vol. 90, pp. 57-63.
  59. Weiss A., Staes N., Pereboom J.J.M., Inoue-Murayama M., Stevens J.M.G. & Eens M. Personality in bonobos. Psychological Science, 2015, vol. 26, pp. 1430-1439.

© Кауфман Д.К., Кауфман Э.Б., 2016

Creative Commons License
Эта статья доступна по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Данный сайт использует cookie-файлы

Продолжая использовать наш сайт, вы даете согласие на обработку файлов cookie, которые обеспечивают правильную работу сайта.

О куки-файлах