Perception by Russian Social Media Users of Mass Protests During the Attempted Coup in Kazakhstan

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The article presents the results of an applied political research on the representation of the 2022 Kazakh events in the Russian segment of social media. The context of the study stems from the significant intersection of the Russian and Kazakh segments of social media and the mutual influence of political processes. Under the political mobilization of the mass protests in Kazakhstan, which turned into an attempted coup, the activities of Russian counterelites intensified in various regions of Russia. Using a hybrid research strategy combined with cognitive mapping and social media analysis the authors managed to identify dynamic, structural and substantive characteristics of the information representation of the Kazakh events in the Russian segment of the Internet. The authors concluded that the scale of the Kazakh protests allowed to draw the short-term interest of the Russian audience, mainly from the regions bordering Kazakhstan. The use of economic triggers (rising prices, inefficient social policy, etc.) led to the involvement of the adult audience in the discussions around the Kazakh events, while a significant part of youth and young adults was excluded from information flows around the events. The study revealed that the Russian opposition attempted to use manipulative “contamination” technology in order to extrapolate the political and economic discontent in Kazakhstan to the situation in Russia. At the same time, the greatest resonance in the Russian segment of users was caused directly by the participation of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) in the settlement, and not by the social and economic triggers that led to the events.

About the authors

Elena V. Brodovskaya

Financial University under the government of the Russian Federation

Email: brodovskaya@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5549-8107

Doctor of Political Sciences, Senior Research Fellow in the Center for Political Studies of the Department of Political Science of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications

Moscow, Russian Federation

Roman V. Parma

Financial University under the government of the Russian Federation

Email: rvparma@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3413-4264

PhD in Political Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications

Moscow, Russian Federation

Konstantiv A. Podrezov

Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University

Email: podrezov@tsput.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1309-1784

PhD in Political Sciences, Rector

Tula, Russian Federation

Maria A. Davydova

Financial University under the government of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: marchikdavydova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3377-7679

Research Assistant at the Center for Political Studies of the Department of Political Science of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications

Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Akhremenko, A.S., Stukal, D.K., & Petrov, A.P. (2020). Network or text? Factors of protest dissemination in social media: theory and data analysis. Polis. Political studies, 2, 73–91. (In Russian).
  2. Andres, M.-H. (2017). Social Media, Civic Engagement, and Slacktivism. Colombia Journal of International Affairs, 230–246.
  3. Boulliane, S. (2017). Revolution in the making? Social media effects across the globe Inf. Information Communication and Society, 22, 1–16.
  4. Brodovskaya, E.V., Davydova, M.A., & Eremin, E.A. (2021). Prolonged political protests in Russia and in the Republic of Belarus in summer-autumn 2020: the reference of the Russian audience of social media. Humanities. Bulletin of the Financial University, 1, 6–13. (In Russian).
  5. Brodovskaya, E.V., & Dombrovskaya, A.Yu. (2018) Big data in political research. Moscow: Moscow Pedagogical State University. (In Russian).
  6. Castells, M. (2015). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity.
  7. Dalton, R.J. (1984) Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies. The Journal of Politics, (1), 264–284.
  8. Dijk Van, T. (2013). Discourse and Power: Representation of Dominance in Language and Communication. Moscow: Librocom. (In Russian). [Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan]
  9. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
  10. Harre, R. (1986) An outline of the social constructionist viewpoint. In D. Scruton & R. Harré, The social construction of emotions. 1986. P. 2–14. http://doi.org/10.2307/3341379
  11. Howard, P.N. (2010) The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Information Technology and Political Islam. London: Oxford University Press.
  12. Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2018). The Political Significance of Social Media Activity and Social Networks. Political Communication, 35, 1–24.
  13. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, Ch. (2001). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards Radical Democratic Politics. London, New York: Verso. Second Edition.
  14. Lukushin, V.A., & Davydova, M.A. The practice of using TikTok as a tool of political mobilization. Internet and Modern Society: Proceedings of the XXIV International Joint Scientific Conference. ITMO University, 2021. (In Russian).
  15. Sloam, J. (2016). Diversity and voice: The political participation of young people in the European Union. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations,18, 521–537.
  16. Theocharis, Y. (2015). The Conceptualization of Digitally Networked Participation. Social Media + Society, (2), 75–92.

Copyright (c) 2022 Brodovskaya E.V., Parma R.V., Podrezov K.A., Davydova M.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies