New Nationalism of Turkish Republic

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Turkish foreign policy, largely characterized as political selfishness, reflects the set of ideological concepts known as the new Turkish nationalism, which makes the country a rather difficult partner to deal with. This article examines the problem of the new Turkish nationalism. It focuses particularly on the Turkish-centric integration under the “neo-Ottoman” foreign policy as a new form of Turkish nationalism, which is especially evident on the space of the so-called “Turkic world”. The authors analyze the main features of Turkish nationalism in the econom ic, political, cultural, and educational spheres. They note that in the humanitarian sphere Turkey continues to focus on the “common Turkic” institutions as well as the ideas of the pan-Turkism ideologists of the past amidst the urge for unification. Moreover, the article considers the concept of Turkey’s self-perception as a “hub”, which generally occurs in all the above-mentioned areas. At the same time, all cases under study are affected by the populist expressions of the Turkish political elite about the unity of the Turks of the world.

About the authors

Vladimir A. Avatkov

Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: v.avatkov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6345-3782

Doctor of Political Science, Head of the Department of Middle and PostSoviet East

Moscow, Russian Federation

Alina I. Sbitneva

Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: a_sbitneva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9196-9348

Research Fellow of the Department of Middle and Post-Soviet East

Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Avatkov, V. A. (2021). Post-Soviet space and Turkey: results of 30 years. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, 14(5), 162–176. (In Russian).
  2. Avatkov, V. A. (2021). Turkey and Azerbaijan: one nation — one state? World Economy and International Relations, 66(2), 90–100. (In Russian).
  3. Druzhilovsky, S. B. (2005). Turkey: the habit of governing. Russia in global politics, 3(6), 48–61. (In Russian).
  4. Flanagan, S. J., Stephen Larrabee, F., Binnendijk, A., Costello, K, Efron, S., Hoobler, J., Kirchner, M., Martini, J., Nader, A., & Wilson, P. A. (2020). Turkey’s Nationalist Course. RAND Corporation: Santa Monica.
  5. Kireev, N. G. (2016). Islam-Turkish synthesis in the state ideology of Turkey. Russia and Muslim World, 12(294), 69–83. (In Russian).
  6. Kireev, N. G. (2007). History of Turkey. Moscow: IV RAN: Kraft+. (In Russian).
  7. Nadein-Rayevsky, V. A. (2021). Ideological struggle and “new Turkey”. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2(47), 22–31. (In Russian).
  8. Saklı, A. R. (2011). The question of the appropriateness of the understanding of the nation-state and nationalism of the Republic of Turkey. Journal of the Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences of Gazi University, 13(1), 1–22. (In Turkısh).
  9. Yesevi, Ç. G. (2018). The Birth, Rise and Political Reflections of Turkish Nationalism. Crypto Press Publication. (In Turkısh).
  10. Zarevand. (2015). Turkey and Panturanism. Moscow: Klyuch-S. (In Russian).

Copyright (c) 2022 Avatkov V.A., Sbitneva A.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies