The Fourth Wave of Feminism: Political Discourse and Opinion Leaders in Twitter

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the 21st century, the feminist movement continues to be one of the largest socio-political movements, which acquired a new consolidation platform via the Internet and new ways for mobilization via social media. The conceptualization of fourth-wave feminism is an exceptionally relevant topic for research, taking into account the results of the Women’s March and #MeToo movements, the actualization of feminist and gender equality issues in the digital social and political agenda, as well as the discourse around the situation with women’s rights and freedoms in Afghanistan. Social media democratized feminism and created precedents of converting feminist political capital from online to offline activities (examples are discussed in the article). To assess the extent, content and potential of fourth-wave feminism, the article presents the results of a Big Data study: network data upload from the social network Twitter for the keyword “women” (including more than 1,000,000 tweets and retweets). Using the methods of network, relational and discourse analysis the author analyzed the datasets obtained (at 5 control points), visualized social graphs, identified and described the opinion leaders (and the content that they formed) in the political discourse of the fourth-wave feminism on the Internet and described the dynamics of key discursive topics. As a result of the study, the author concluded how the issue of Afghan women’s rights entered the political discourse of fourth-wave feminism and how and why it was replaced by the issue of the Texas abortion law. The article ends in a conclusion about the prospects for the development of the discourse of fourth-wave feminism.

About the authors

Anna A. Gnedash

Kuban State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: anna_gnedash@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3516-107X

PhD of Political Science, Associate Professor

Krasnodar, Russia

References

  1. De Beauvoir, S. (1949). Le Deuxième Sexe. Paris: Gallimard [Beauvoir, de S. (2015). Second sex. Moscow. (In Russian)].
  2. Bonfiglioli, C. (2020). Women’s activism, the Cold War, and the UN Decade for Women (1975–1985). Aspasia, 14(1), 144–147. https://doi.org/10.3167/asp.2020.140110
  3. Bryson, V. (1992). Feminist political theory: An introduction. UK: MacMillan [Bryson, V. (2001). The political theory of feminism. Moscow. (In Russian)].
  4. Burgess, S.K. (2018). Between the desire for law and the law of desire: #MeToo and the cost of telling the truth today. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 51(4), 342–367. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.51.4.0342
  5. Käppeli, A.-M. (2015). Feminist Scenes. In G. Fraisse & M. Perrot (Eds.), A history of women in the West, Vol. 4. Emerging feminism from revolution to World War. Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press [Käppeli, A.-M. (2015). Images of feminism. In History of women in the West. Volume IV: The Rise of Feminism: From the French Revolution to the World War. St. Petersburg. (In Russian)].
  6. Crawford, E. (2002). The Women’s Suffrage Movement: A Reference Guide 1866–1928. London.
  7. Diamond, D. (2009). The fourth wave of feminism: psychoanalytic perspectives. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 10(4), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240650903228187
  8. Felmlee, D.H., Blanford, J.I., Matthews, S.A., & MacEachren, A.M. (2020). The geography of sentiment towards the Women’s March of 2017. PLOS ONE, 15(6), e0233994. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233994
  9. French Feminist Thought: A Reader. (1987). New York.
  10. Gnedash, A.A. (2016). Conceptualization of the phenomenon of the fourth wave of feminism in the new political reality. In O.V. Gaman-Golutvina, L.V. Smorgunova & L.N. Timofeeva (Eds.), Russia in the New Political Reality: Strategies and Methods of Development (pp. 75–76). Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference of the RAPS. Moscow: RANEPA. (In Russian).
  11. Hall, S. (2010). American Patriotism, American Protest: Social Movements Since the Sixties. Philadelphia.
  12. Thébaud, F., Duby, G., & Perrot, M. (Eds.) (2000). Toward a cultural identity in the twentieth century (Volume V) (History of women in the West). Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press [History of Women in the West. Volume V: The Formation of Cultural Identity in the 20th Century (2015). St. Petersburg. (In Russian)].
  13. Just, S.N., & Muhr, S.L. (2019). “Together We Rise”: Collaboration and contestation as narrative drivers of the Women’s March. Leadership, 15(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715018809497
  14. LeGates, M. (2001). In Their Time: A History of Feminism in Western Society. NY.
  15. Looft, R. (2017). #girlgaze: photography, fourth wave feminism, and social media advocacy. Continuum, 31(6), 892–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2017.1370539
  16. Maclaran, P. (2015). Feminism’s fourth wave: a research agenda for marketing and consumer research. Journal of Marketing Management, 31, 1732–1738. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1076497
  17. Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2018). #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(2), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506818765318
  18. Moni, S. (2020). Intersectionality in the contemporary women’s marches: Possibilities for social change. Journal of Feminist Scholarship, 16, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.23860/jfs.2019.16.01
  19. Orloff, A.S. (2009). Gendering the comparative analysis of welfare states: An unfinished agenda. Sociological Theory, 27(3), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01350.x
  20. Phillips, R., & Cree, V.E. (2014). What does the ‘fourth wave’ mean for teaching feminism in twenty-first century social work? Social Work Education, 33(7), 930–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2014.885007
  21. Prochaska, F.K. (1980). Women and Philanthropy in 19th Century England. London.
  22. Ryabchenko, N.A., Katermina, V.V., Gnedash, A.A., & Malysheva, O.P. (2018). Political content of social movements in the online space of modern states: methodology of the analysis and research practices. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 19(3), 139–162. (In Russian).
  23. Smith-Rosenberg, C. (1971). Religion and the Rise of American City. Ithaca.
  24. Vickery, A.E. (2018). After the march, what? Rethinking how we teach the feminist movement. Social Studies Research and Practice, 13(3), 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-05-2018-0020
  25. Wahyudiputra, A., Amrullah, A.T., & Adrian, D. (2021). The Weinstein Effects: forecasting the genesis of cancel culture in Hollywood industry. Journal of Language Literary and Cultural Studies, 4(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.30996/anaphora.v4i1.4710
  26. Women in German History: From Bourgeois Emansipation to Sexual Liberation. (1989). Oxford.
  27. Zarkov, D., & Davis, K. (2018). Ambiguities and dilemmas around #MeToo: #ForHow Long and #WhereTo? European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506817749436

Copyright (c) 2022 Gnedash A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies