Феминистская внешняя политика и гендерная справедливость в международной повестке

Обложка

Цитировать

Полный текст

Аннотация

В статье раскрывается понимание содержания и значение феминистской внешней политики в контексте официального международного контента. Оценивается влияние содержания Резолюции 1325 СБ ООН на развитие феминистской внешней политики и гендерной справедливости. В результате был сделан вывод об определенных фундаментальных ограничениях документа, которые препятствуют достижению реальных целей, лоббируемых международными организациями и учеными-феминистками, а также деконструкции учета гендерной проблематики. Отмечается прагматичный подход глобальной политической элиты к решению проблем гендерной справедливости, основой которого является рациональность и патриархальность, что препятствует международной деятельности женщин. Возникает необходимость в разработке и внедрении с учетом имеющегося опыта наиболее эффективных, инклюзивных и эмансипирующих практик.

Об авторах

Гусейн Аббас оглы Аббасов

Российский университет дружбы народов

Автор, ответственный за переписку.
Email: 1042208146@rudn.university
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7858-9263

аспирант политологии кафедры политического анализа и управления

Москва, Российская Федерация

Список литературы

  1. Abels, G. (2012). Research by, for and about women: Gendering science and research policy. In G. Abels & J.M. Mushaben (Eds.), Gendering the European Union: New Approaches to Old Democratic Deficits (pp. 187-207). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230353299_10
  2. Acker, J. (1999). Rewriting class, race and gender: Problems in feminist thinking. In M.M. Ferree, J. Lorber & B.B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender. Vol. The gender lens (pp. 44-69). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
  3. Aggestam, K., & Rosamond, A. (2019a). Re-politicising the gender-security nexus: Sweden’s Feminist foreign policy. European Review of International Studies, 5, 30-48.
  4. Aggestam, K., & Rosamond, A.B. (2019b). Feminist foreign policy 3.0: Advancing ethics and gender equality in global politics. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 39(1), 37-48.
  5. Aggestam, K., & Towns, A. (2019). The gender turn in diplomacy: A new research agenda. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 21(1), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2018.1483206
  6. Aggestam, K., Bergman Rosamond, A., & Kronsell, A. (2019). Theorising Feminist foreign policy. International Relations, 33(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117818811892
  7. Al-Ali, N., Pratt, N., & Enloe, C. (2009). What Kind of Liberation?: Women and the Occupation of Iraq. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
  8. Basu, S. (2016). The global south writes 1325 (Too). International Political Science Review, 37(3), 362-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116642616
  9. Brzezinski, Z. (1997). Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books.
  10. Calkin, S. (2015). Post-feminist spectatorship and the girl effect: “Go ahead, really imagine her”. Third World Quarterly, 36(4), 654-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1022525
  11. Chandler, D. (2003). Rhetoric without responsibility: The attraction of ‘ethical’ foreign policy. British Journal of Politics & International Relations - BR J POLIT INT RELAT, 5, 295-316.
  12. Chandler, D. (2006). Empire in Denial: The Politics of State-Building. London ; Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.
  13. Cohn, C. (2008). Mainstreaming gender in UN security policy: A path to political transformation? In S.M. Rai & G. Waylen (Eds.), Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives (pp. 185-206). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583931_9
  14. Collins, P.H., & Chepp, V. (2013). Intersectionality. In The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford University Press. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199751457.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199751457-e-2
  15. Collins, P.H. (2000). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
  16. Connell, R.W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  17. Connell, R.W. (2009). Gender. Cambridge: Polity.
  18. Debusscher, P. (2014). Gender Mainstreaming on the Ground? The Case of EU Development Aid Towards Rwanda. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2523368. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved April 30, 2020, from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2523368
  19. Eschle, C. (2020). Feminism and peace movements: Engendering anti-nuclear activism. In T. Väyrynen, É. Féron, S. Parashar & C. Confortini (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Feminist Peace Research (pp. 250-259). New York.
  20. Fanon, F. (1961). Les Damnes de la Terre. Paris: La Decouverte Editions. (In French).
  21. Hudson, N.F. (2009). Securitizing women’s rights and gender equality. Journal of Human Rights, 8(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754830802686526.
  22. Khanna, P. (2004). The metrosexual superpower. Foreign Policy. Retrieved April 30, 2020, from https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/27/the-metrosexual-superpower/
  23. Kronsell, A. (2015). The power of EU masculinities: A feminist contribution to European integration theory. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(1), 104-120.
  24. Kronsell, A. (2016). Sexed bodies and military masculinities: Gender path dependence in EU’s common security and defense policy. Men and Masculinities, 19(3), 311-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X15583906
  25. Kronsell, A. (2019). The contribution of feminist perspectives to climate governance. In S. Buckingham & V. Le Masson (Eds.), Understanding Climate Change through Gender Relations Abingdon (pp. 104-120). Oxon; New York, NY : Routledge
  26. Manners, I. (2010). Global Europa: Mythology of the European Union in world politics. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(1), 67-87
  27. Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396. Retrieved April 30, 2020, from http://ezproxy.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/ login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1943-03751-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site
  28. McLeod, L., & O’Reilly, M. (2019). Critical peace and conflict studies: Feminist interventions. Peacebuilding, 7(2), 127-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2019.1588457
  29. Morgan, K.P. (2018). Describing the emperor’s new clothes: Three myths of educational (in-) equity. In A. Diller, B. Houston, K.P. Morgan & M. Ayim (Eds.), The Gender Question in Education (pp. 105-122). Routledge
  30. Mushaben, J.M. (2012). Women on the move: EU migration and citizenship policy. In G. Abels & J.M. Mushaben (Eds.), Gendering the European Union: New Approaches to Old Democratic Deficits (pp. 208-227). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230353299_11
  31. O’Reilly, M. (2012). Muscular interventionism. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 14(4), 529-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.726096
  32. Orwell, G. (1948). 1984 Nineteen Eighty-Four. New York, NY: Penguin.
  33. Pratt, N., & Richter-Devroe, S. (2011). Critically examining UNSCR 1325 on women, peace and security. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 13(4), 489-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2011.611658
  34. Schlag, G. (2012). Into the ‘heart of darkness’ - EU’s civilising mission in the DR Congo. Journal of International Relations and Development, 15, 321-344.
  35. Sen, A. (2001). Development as Freedom. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
  36. Shepherd, L.J. (2011). Sex, security and superhero(in)es: From 1325 to 1820 and beyond. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 13(4), 504-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2011.611659
  37. Shepherd, L.J. (2014). Marysia Zalewski. Feminist international relations: Exquisite corpse. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 16(1), 161-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2013.876299
  38. Sotirovič, V. P., & Kontvaine, V. (2021). Gendering discourses and process of policymaking in local governance: ‘there has been no vital need so far’. Public Policy and Administration, 20(1), 58-69.
  39. Sperling, V. (2015). Sex, Politics, and Putin: Political Legitimacy in Russia. Oxford University Press.
  40. Stern, M. (2011). Gender and race in the European security strategy: Europe as a ‘force for good’? Journal of International Relations and Development, 14, 7-12.
  41. Tafakori, S. (2021). Digital feminism beyond nativism and empire: Affective territories of recognition and competing claims to suffering in Iranian women’s campaigns winner of the 2021 Catharine Stimpson prize for outstanding feminist scholarship. Signs, 47(1), 47-80
  42. Thomson, J. (2020). The growth of Feminist (?) foreign policy. E-International Relations [Online blog]. Retrieved April 30, 2020, from https://www.e-ir.info/2020/02/10/the-growth-of-feminist-foreign-policy/
  43. Tickner, J. (1993). Gender in international relations: Feminist perspectives on achieving global security. Political Science Quarterly, 108(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2080425
  44. Zalewski, M. (2013). Feminist international relations: Exquisite corpse. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge

© Аббасов Г.А., 2022

Creative Commons License
Эта статья доступна по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Данный сайт использует cookie-файлы

Продолжая использовать наш сайт, вы даете согласие на обработку файлов cookie, которые обеспечивают правильную работу сайта.

О куки-файлах