Migration and Recent Aspects of Right-Wing Populist Discourse in Europe

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Intensifying migration processes in the West are reflected in certain changes in the discourse of European right-wing populist and nationalist parties. Along with anti-mass migration sentiments, rhetoric of these political forces demonstrates new elements related to the topics of “the clash of civilizations” (Huntington), as well as civilizational solidarity - the ideas of “civilizationism” (Brubaker). In the context of global transformations and changes in the ethno-cultural landscape of the continent, European nationalists became less prone to tradition for their ideology thesis of intra-European animosity. On the other hand, it tend to rhetorically transform, and usually extend, the boundaries of imagined community of “the European fortress”, which needs to be defended. Principal dichotomy of today’s European right-wing populist rhetoric is represented by the secular post-Christian community (“us”) and seemingly archaic and fundamentalist migrant community from Muslim countries (“the others”).

About the authors

Stanislav O. Byshok

Lomonosov Moscow State University; Autonomous non-profit organization “International election monitoring organization CIS-EMO”

Author for correspondence.
Email: sbyshok@gmail.com

PhD Candidate in Political Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University, CEO at the Autonomous non-profit organization “International election monitoring organization CIS-EMO”

1 Leninskie gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation; 11 Tekstilshchikov 8th St, Moscow, 109129, Russian Federation

References

  1. Byshok S.O. Prospects of right-wing populists in the European Parliament (2019–2024). Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast'. 2019; 1 (11): 140–153 (In Russ.).
  2. Dennison J., Geddes A. A Rising Tide? The Salience of Immigration and the Rise of Anti‐Immigration Political Parties in Western Europe. The Political Quarterly. 2019; 90 (1): 107–116. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12620. Accessed: 05.03.2020.
  3. Lehne S., Grabbe H. 2019 European Parliament elections will change the EU’s political dynamics // Carnegie-Europe. 11.12.2018. Available from: https://carnegieeurope.eu/2018/12/11/2019-european-parliament-elections-will-change-eu-s-political-dynamics-pub-77922. Accessed: 05.03.2020.
  4. Wodak R. The politics of fear: what right-wing populist discourses mean. Los Angeles: Sage; 2015. 238 p.
  5. Mudde C. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition. 2004; 39 (4): 541–563.
  6. Taguieff P.-A. Political science confronts populism: from a conceptual mirage to a real problem. Telos. 1995; 103: 9–43.
  7. Keskinen S., Norocel O.C., Jørgensen M.B. The politics and policies of welfare chauvinism under the economic crisis. Critical Social Policy. 2016; 36 (3): 321–329. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018315624168. Accessed: 05.03.2020
  8. Vajnshtejn G.I. Contemporary populism as an object of political science analysis. Polis. Political Studies. 2017; 4: 69–89 (In Russ.).
  9. Krastev I. After Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2017. 120 p.
  10. Brubaker R. Between nationalism and civilizationism: the European populist moment in comparative perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2017; 40 (8): 1191–1226. Available from: URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1294700. Accessed: 06.03.2020.
  11. Byshok S.O. “Clash of civilizations” concept in the EU right-wing populists’ discourse. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Politologija. 2019; 21 (4): 745–754. doi: 10.22363/2313-1438-2019-21-4-745-754 (In Russ.).
  12. Huntington S. The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs. 1993; 72: 22–49.
  13. Kumar K. The return of civilization – and of Arnold Toynbee? Comparative Studies in Society and History. 2014; 56 (4): 815–843.
  14. Spengler O. Der Untergang Des Abendlandes. Köln: Anaconda; 2017.
  15. Danilevskij N.Ja. Russia and Europe. Мoscow: Institut russkoj civilizacii, Blagoslovenie; 2011. 816 p. (In Russ.).
  16. Fukuyama F. The end of history? The National Interest. 1989; 16: 3–18.
  17. Fukuyama F. Identity: the demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2018. 240 p.
  18. Pipes D. Europe’s civilizationist parties. Middle East Forum. 31.10.2018. URL: https://www.meforum.org/7602/europe-civilizationist-parties. Accessed: 05.03.2020.
  19. Mouritsen P. The particular universalism of a Nordic civic nation: Common values, state religion and Islam in Danish political culture. In: Modood T., Triandafyllidou A., Zapata-Barrero R. (eds.). Multiculturalism, Muslims and сitizenship: A European approach. London: Routledge; 2006. P. 70–93.
  20. Kharkevich M., Muzalevskij V., Oskolkov P. Archaicism and contemporary right-wing populism in Europe. Sovremennaja Evropa. 2018; 1: 59–68 (In Russ.).
  21. Lunkin R. Religion and European populism: a Christian factor in political debates. Sovremennaja Evropa. 2018; 1: 102–113 (In Russ.).
  22. Said E. Orientalism. London: Penguin; 2003. 396 p.
  23. Bavyrin D. Why Hungary became the main crusader of Europe. Vzgljad. 12.02.2019. URL: https://vz.ru/world/2019/2/12/963726.html. Accessed: 05.03.2020 (In Russ.).
  24. Sten’kin D.S. On the 2011 Hungarian Constitution. Rossijskoe pravo: Obrazovanie, praktika, nauka. 2016; 1 (91): 47–49 (In Russ.).
  25. Andreeva L., Smirnov M., Shherbakov V. De-Christianization process in the EU. Sovremennaja Evropa. 2018; 5: 120–130 (In Russ.).
  26. Shroufi O. The Gates of Jerusalem: European revisionism and the populist radical Right. Race & Class. 2015; 57 (2): 24–42. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396815595799. Accessed: 05.03.2020.
  27. Kartsev D. The right column. Why Merkel has to yield to her own ministers. Moskovskij centr Karnegi. 04.07.2018. URL: https://carnegie.ru/commentary/76736. Accessed: 05.03.2020 (In Russ.).
  28. Baunov А. Trump in the context. Why the new right win. Moskovskij centr Karnegi. 20.01.2017. URL: https://carnegie.ru/commentary/67741. Accessed: 05.03.2020 (In Russ.).
  29. Alonzi R. Political identity of the EU: new paradigms and old challenges. Sovremennaja Evropa. 2018; 6: 142–151 (In Russ.).
  30. Lunkin R., Filatov S. Inter-confessional differences in Europe and the new ideological confrontations. Sovremennaja Evropa. 2018; 3: 102–114 (In Russ.).
  31. De Orleana P., Michelsen N. Reactionary internationalism: the philosophy of the New Right. Review of International Studies. 2019; 45 (5): 748–767. URL: https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0260210519000159. Accessed: 05.03.2020.
  32. Byshok S.O. Radical Ukrainian nationalism and the right turn in Europe. Voprosy nacionalizma. 2018; 1 (31): 79–85 (In Russ.).
  33. Byshok S.O. The Russians in the rhetoric of right-wing populist parties in Europe. Vestnik rossijskoj nacii. 2018; 2: 210–223 (In Russ.).
  34. Byshok S.O. Russia’s civilizational identity: the view of EU right-wing Eurosceptics. Vestnik rossijskoj nacii. 2018; 4: 227–240 (In Russ.).
  35. Anderson B. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London; New York: Verso; 1991. 224 p.
  36. Barth F. (ed.). Ethnic groups and boundaries. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, USA; 1969. 153 p.
  37. Gellner E. Nations and nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983; 150 p.

Copyright (c) 2020 Byshok S.O.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies