Liberal Way of Life as a Political Philosophical Problem: Review of the Book: Lefebvre, A. (2024). Liberalism as a Way of Life. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 285 p.
- Authors: Gutorov V.A.1,2, Shirinyants A.A.2,3
-
Affiliations:
- St Petersburg University
- Institute of Sociology, Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Issue: Vol 26, No 4 (2024): Political Meanings, Identity Theory and the History of Ideas
- Pages: 871-883
- Section: BOOK REVIEWS
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/view/42669
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2024-26-4-871-883
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FVGKDA
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
It is no coincidence that the book by Alexandr Lefebvre, professor of political science and philosophy at the University of Sydney, has caused a rather complex range of impressions in the Western academic world and political journalism immediately after its publication by Princeton University Press. Scientists were undoubtedly attracted and at the same time somewhat puzzled by the author’s rather unconventional interpretation of the phenomenon of liberalism. Judging by the context of A. Lefebvre’s earlier works, his turn to the problems of liberalism seems quite unexpected. The reason for the scientist’s sudden turn to the topic of liberalism is caused by a number of theoretical considerations of a political and philosophical nature. The central role in A. Lefebvre’s “strategy” is played by the concept and image of the “Christian kingdom” (Christendom), borrowed from biblical political rhetoric. The “liberal kingdom” (Liberaldom) is, according to A. Lefebvre, a mixture of liberalism and other ideologies and systems, including capitalism (with its individualism, materialism and instrumentalism), democracy (with its latent populism), nationalism and internationalism (with their patriotism and often chauvinism), meritocracy (with its calculations of value and reward), as well as overtly illiberal forces. This character of Lefebvre’s argumentation can hardly be perceived positively by many real and potential allies of liberalism. In general, A. Lefebvre’s book differs from many apologetic works, first of all, in that the apology for the liberal way of life presented in it spontaneously acquires an overtly conservative shade.
About the authors
Vladimir A. Gutorov
St Petersburg University; Institute of Sociology, Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: gut-50@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8063-2558
Dr.Sc. (Philosophy) Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and Philosophy of Politics, Faculty of Political Science, St Petersburg University; Leading Researcher of the Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation; Moscow, Russian FederationAleksandr A. Shirinyants
Institute of Sociology, Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Lomonosov Moscow State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: jants@jandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6949-2256
Dr.Sc. (Political Science) Professor, Head of the Department of History of Socio-Political Doctrines, Faculty of Political Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Leading Researcher of the Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Moscow, Russian FederationReferences
- Boldin V.A., Karipov B.N., & Shirinyants, A.A. (2022). “The Significant Other”: reflections on the book “Culture of the Spirit” vs “Culture of reason”: intellectuals and power in Britain and Russia in the XVII–XVIII centuries: a collective monograph. Moscow: Aquilon. Ural Historical Journal, 4(77), 188–191. (In Russian).
- Gutorov, V.A., & Shirinyants, A.A. (2024). The idea of competition in international political theory: Some current aspects of the discussion. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations, 29(2), 133–144. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.2.12
- Gutorov, V.A., & Shirinyants, A.A. (2020). On some features of theoretical discussions about communism in the XXI century (reflections on the book Communism. Anti-communism. Russophobia / P.P. Apryshko et al. Moscow: The world of philosophy, Algorithm, 2019. 495 p.). Voprosy Filosofii, (9), 64–74. (In Russian).
- Гуторов В.А., Ширинянц А.А. Свобода личности против «свободного государства»: иллюзорная дилемма или реальность? (Размышления над книгой Aguila Marchena L. del. Communism Political Power and Personal Freedom in Marx: Beyond the Dualism of Realms. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. 282 p.). Диалог со временем. Альманах интеллектуальной истории. 2022, Вып. 79. С. 374–380.
- Gutorov, V.A., & Shirinyants, A.A. (2022). Personal freedom versus “free state”: An illusory dilemma or reality? (Reflections on the book by Aguila Marchena L. del. Communism, Political Power and Personal Freedom in Mars: Beyond the Dualism of Realms. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. 282 p.). Dialogue with Time. The Almanac of Intellectual History, 79, 374–380.
- Alexandre Lefebvre interviews Paul Patton. (2013). Contemporary Political Theory, 12(3), 206–214.
- Bernstein, R.J. (2013). New constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Briggs, L. (2015). Imperialism as a way of life: Thinking sex and gender in American Empire. Radical History Review, 123, 9–31.
- Brunet, M., & Lоwer, A.R.M. (1955). This most famous stream: The liberal democratic way of life. Toronto: The Ryerson Press, 1954. 193 p. Revue d’histoire de l’Amérique Française, 8(4), 570–580.
- Deneen, P.J. (2023). Regime change: Toward a postliberal future. New York: Sentinel.
- Deneen, P.J. (2018). Why liberalism failed. New Haven. London: Yale University Press.
- Dillon, M. (1996). Politics of security: Towards a political philosophy of continental thought. London; New York: Routledge.
- Dillon, M. (2015). Biopolitics of security: A political analytic of finitude. London. New York: Routledge.
- Dillon, M., & Reid, J. (2009). The liberal way of war: Killing to make life live. London; New York: Routledge.
- Duffield, M. (2010). The Liberal way of development and the development—security impasse: Exploring the global life-chance divide. Security Dialogue, 41(1), 53–76.
- Ehrman, B.D. (Ed.). (2003). The Apostolic Fathers. Volume II: Epistle of Barnabas, Papias and Quadratus. Epistle to Diognetus. The Shepherd of Hermas. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: Harvard University Press.
- Freeden, M. (2009). Liberal languages: Ideological imaginations and twentieth century progressive thought. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- Guess, R. (2005). Liberalism and its discontents. In Geuss R. Outside ethics (pp. 11–28). Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
- Guess, R. (2022). Not thinking like a liberal. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Ikenberry, J.G. (2024). Liberalism as a Way of Life. By Alexandre Lefebvre Princeton University Press. Foreign Affairs, May/June 2024, 190–191.
- Ikenberry, G.J. (2009). Liberal internationalism 3.0: America and the dilemmas of liberal world order. Perspective on Politics, 7(1), 71–87.
- Jacob Jacob N. (Ed.). (2024). The Epistle to Diognetus: The greek text with introduction, translation, and notes by Henry G. Meecham. Cerone. Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.
- Jahn, B. (2013). Liberal internationalism: Theory, history, practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Lefebvre, A. (2017). The end of a line: Care of the self in modern political thought. Genealogy, 1(2), 2–14.
- Lefebvre, A. (2018). Human rights and the care of the self. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
- Lefebvre, A. (2024a). Liberalism as a way of life. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
- Lefebvre, A. (2013). Human rights as a way of life: On Bergson’s political philosophy. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
- Lefebvre, A. (2024b). Everyday life in the modern world. London; New York: Routledge.
- Lefebvre, A., & White, M. (Eds.). (2012). Bergson, politics, and religion. Durham; London: Duke University Press Books.
- Lefebvre, A., & Schott, N.F., (Eds.). (2020). Interpreting Bergson: Critical essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Nisbet, R. (1986). Conservatism: Dream and reality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Oakeshott, M. (1962). Rationalism in politics and other essays. London: Methuen.
- Pridham, G. (1983). Not so much a programme-more a way of life: European perspectives on the British SDP/Liberal alliance. Parliamentary Affairs, 36(2), 183–200.
- Putnam, R.A. (2017a). Weaving Seamless Webs. In H. Putnam, R.A. Putnam & D. MacArthur (Eds.), Pragmatism as a way of life: the lasting legacy of William James and John Dewey (pp. 71–86). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Putnam, R.A. (2017b). Rorty’s vision: Philosophical courage and social hope. In H. Putnam, R.A. Putnam & D. MacArthur (Eds.), Pragmatism as a way of life: the lasting legacy of William James and John Dewey (pp. 87–107). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism. Expanded Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Rosenblatt, H. (2018). The lost history of liberalism. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
- Young, T. (2014). Liberal world orders/liberal internationalism: theory, history, practice. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27(4), 766–769.
