Cinema and Identity: Criss-Cross Reflections

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper focuses on how cinema shapes national, civilizational, and political identity and how it fosters civic identity as a driver for social development. The analysis is based on approaches inherent to identity studies and uses comparative methods; the empirical base consists of films selected through the purposive sampling method. The focus is on feature films, which provide extensive material for studying the trends of modern political development and its perception by contemporaries. Referring to examples of film production from various countries representative in this sense, the authors identify the mechanisms used by patrons and producers of films to influence the identity of the audience and the political picture of the world people identify with. Cinema is regarded as an effective tool for creating and revising historical narratives, for promoting new images and meanings and for exposing prospects for future social development. Special attention is paid to the genre of biographical films (biopics) portraying political leaders and individuals who embody the national ideal. The authors conclude that as of today, the expectation of a hero is an unmet public demand in contemporary cinema.

About the authors

Irina S. Semenenko

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: semenenko@imemo.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2529-9283

Doctor of Political Sciences - Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Deputy Director for Research

Moscow, Russian Federation

Vladimir I. Pantin

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: v.pantin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4218-4579

Doctor of Philosophy - Head of the Department of Comparative Political Studies, Centre for Comparative Socio-EEconomic and Political Studies

Moscow, Russian Federation

Elena V. Morozova

Kuban State University

Email: morozova_e@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1369-7594

Doctor of Philosophy - Professor of the Department of State Policy and Public Administration

Krasnodar, Russian Federation

References

  1. Artamonova, U.Z. (2020). American cinema as an instrument of US public diplomacy. Analysis and Forecast. Journal of IMEMO RAS, 2, 110–122. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2020-2-110-122
  2. Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1995). Social construction of reality. Treatise on the sociology of knowledge. (Trans. by E.D. Rutkevich). Moscow: Medium, 323 p. (In Russian).
  3. Castells, M. (2000). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Moscow: HSE, 608 p. (In Russian).
  4. Castells, M. (2020). The power of communication. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 591 p. (In Russian).
  5. Dubois, R. (2007). Une histoire politique du cinéma: Etats-­Unis, Europe, URSS. Arles: Ed. Sulliver, 214 p.
  6. Edensor, T. (2002). National identity, popular culture and everyday life. Oxford, New York: Berg, 216 р. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003086178
  7. Fadeeva, L.A. (2023). Permanent crisis. In I.S. Semenenko (Ed.), Identity: Person, Society, Policy. New Contours of the Research Field (pp. 371–378). Moscow: Ves’ mir. (In Russian).
  8. Fattor, E.M. (2014). American empire and the arsenal of entertainment: Soft power and cultural weaponization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 241 p. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137382238
  9. Fedorov, A.V. (2013). Transformation of the image of Russia on the Western screen: From the era of ideological confrontation (1946–1991) to the modern stage (1992–2019). 2nd ed. Moscow: Publ. MOO “Information for All”. (In Russian).
  10. Greenburg Gilliom, K. (2016). Searching for truth: A collective memory of Aldo Moro in Italian cinema (dissertation). Chapel Hill, Department of Romance Studies: University of North Carolina.
  11. Huntington, S.P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster, 410 р.
  12. Khalilov, V.M. (2019). Contemporary American cinema and neoliberal ideology. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 2, 112–127. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S032120680003769-9
  13. Khanna, A. (2017). Why is India’s soft power still untapped? The Wire. Retrieved August 03, 2024, from https://thewire.in/175595/why-­is-indias-­soft-power-­still-untapped/
  14. Kulikova, D.N. (2023). Cinema as an instrument of soft power of the state on the example of cinematography of Spain and the USA. Ideas and Ideals, 15, 2 (2), 459–475. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2023-15.2.2-459-475
  15. Lerner, M. (1992). America as a civilization: Life and thought in the United States today. Moscow: Raduga, (In Russian).
  16. Lolo, M.M. (2013). International migration and cinematography. Observer, 3, 101–108. (In Russian).
  17. Lubsky, A.V. (2015). State-­civilization and national-­civilizational identity in Russia. Humanitarian of the South of Russia, 2, 30–45. (In Russian).
  18. Maini, T.S. (2016). Can soft power facilitate India’s foreign policy goals? The Hindu Centre for Politics. Retrieved July 18, 2024 from https://www.thehinducentre.com/the-­arena/current-­issues/can-­soft-power-­facilitate-indias-­foreign-policy-­goals/article64931507.ece
  19. Naumov, A.O. & Polozhevich, R.S. (2018). “Soft power” of India as a sovereign state: History and modernity (Part II). Public Administration. Electronic Bulletin, 70, 291–328. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/2070-1381-2018-00095
  20. Pells, R. (2012). Modernist America: Art, music, movies, and the globalization of American culture. New Haven: Yale University Press, 512 p.
  21. Resmini, M. (2023). Italian political cinema. Figures of the long ‘68. Minnesota: Minnesota UP, 294 р. https://doi.org/10.5749/9781452970158
  22. Romanova, A.P. & Chernichkin, D.A. (2024). Turkey and Pan-­Turkism influence on the development of new national identities in the Caspian region: The evidence from Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 26(1), 181–206. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2024-26-1-181-206
  23. Ryabov, O.V. (2011). “Soviet enemy” in American cinema: The gender. Woman in Russian Society, 2, 20–30. (In Russian).
  24. Semenenko, I.S. (Ed.) (2017). Identity: The Individual, society, and politics. Moscow: Ves’Mir, 992 p. (In Russian).
  25. Semenenko, I.S. (2022). National development policy in the face of global challenges: The Irish Pendulum. World Economy and International Relations, 66(7), 81–93. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-7-81-93
  26. Semenenko, I.S. (Ed.) (2023). Identity: The individual, society, and politics. New outlines of the research field. Moscow: Ves’ Mir, 512 p. (In Russian).
  27. Skilling, G.H, & Griffiths, F. (Eds.). (1971). Interest groups in Soviet politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  28. Shaw, T. (2007). Hollywood’s Cold war. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 352 р.
  29. Skorik, A.V. (2018). Visualization as a political technology. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 20(4), 609–615. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2018-20-4-609-615
  30. Tarkovsky, A. (2002). Captured time. In P. Volkova (Ed.), Andrei Tarkovsky. Archives. Documents. Memories (pp. 95–350). Moscow: Eksmo-­press. (In Russian).
  31. Thompson, K.M. (2003). New Zealand’s first indigenous blockbuster. In J. Stringer (Ed.), Movie Blockbusters (pp. 230–241). New York: Routledge.
  32. Yusev, A.B. (2017). Cinema politics: Hidden meanings of contemporary Hollywood Films. Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 300 p. (In Russian).
  33. Zorkaya, N.M. (2014). History of Russian cinema. 20th century. Moscow: OOO “Bely Gorod”, 1113 p. (In Russian).

Copyright (c) 2024 Semenenko I.S., Pantin V.I., Morozova E.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.