Latinization of the Language Under the Leadership of Turkey as a Tool for the Formation of a New Identity for the Turkic Post-Soviet States

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The study examines the issue of creating a common Turkic alphabet through the prism of Turkey’s interests in its attempts to form a new identity for the Turkic states. It is noted that the collapse of the Soviet Union and the formation of five new Turkic states were positively received in Turkey and gave impetus to the activation of pan-Turkic ideas. Thus, one of the aspects of Ankara’s humanitarian interaction with the newly formed countries was cooperation within the framework of linguistic reforms, where Turkey actively advocated for the Latinization of the alphabet of the Turkic states. The authors analyze the phenomenon of language in constructing the identity of states. Turkey, which has experience in radical linguistic reforms, recognizes the potential of such transformations in the Turkic space. Ankara seeks to lead this process in order to promote its own logics and narratives, which should ultimately lead to the adoption of the Turkish language as a single language for the Turks. It is noted that with the reformatting of the Organization of Turkic States (OTS), there has been a tendency to return to the agenda of discussions of a single alphabet for the Turkic peoples. Ankara promotes this topic at expert seminars, CTG meetings, etc. It is concluded that Turkey’s strategy is aimed at the long term and the lack of quick results in this area does not indicate its failure. Ankara systematically takes up the entire spectrum of interaction with Turkic partners, creating the foundation for future integration.

About the authors

Yuriy M. Pochta

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: pochta_yum@pfur.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9600-2665
SPIN-code: 5600-3410

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Department of Comparative Politics, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

Moscow, Russian Federation

Razil I. Guzaerov

Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the RAS

Author for correspondence.
Email: guzaerov99@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0006-9975
SPIN-code: 1316-0272

Junior Researcher, Department of Middle and Post-Soviet East

Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Adler, E. (2013). Constructivism in international relations: sources, contributions and debates. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse & B.A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations. (pp. 112–144). SAGE publications: London.
  2. Amirbekova, A.B. (2019). Strengthening the Turkic identity of the Kazakh people — transition to Latin script. European journal of literature and linguistics, 2, 15–21. (In Russian).
  3. Avatkov, V.A., & Guzaerov, R.I. (2023). The construction of social reality in the Turkic space. The ethnolinguistic aspect. The Free thought, 4, 69–76. (In Russian).
  4. Brubaker, R. (2013). Language, religion, and the politics of difference. Nations and Nationalism, 19(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2012.00562.x
  5. Ercilasun, A.B. (1999). The acceptance of the Latin alphabet in the Turkish World. Studia Orientalia, 87, 63–69.
  6. Guboglo, M.N. (1998). Languages of ethnic mobilization. Moscow: Shkola «Yazyki russkoj kul’tury». (In Russian).
  7. Güler, H. (2019). Türk Dünyası’nda ortak yazı dili ve alfabe meselesi. Türk Etkini, (2), 14–20.
  8. Guzaerov, R.I. (2023). Social and cultural interaction of member countries of the Organization of Turkic States (Review). Social innovations and social sciences, (3), 143–151. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31249/snsn/2023.03.09
  9. Hekimoğlu, V.S.F. (2017). Türkiye’de türkçülük hareketinin ortaya çikmasi ve türk ocaklari. Akademik İzdüşüm Dergisi, 2(1), 41–50.
  10. Hobsbawm, E.J. (1998). Nations and Nationalism since 1780. St. Petersburg: Publishing house
  11. “Alethea”. (In Russian). [Hobsbawm, E.J. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780: programme, myth, reality. New York: Cambridge University Press].
  12. Kosmarsky, A.A. (2003). Meanings of Latinization in Uzbekistan (late 20th — early 21st centuries). Bulletin of Eurasia, 3, 62–85. (In Russian).
  13. Landau, J., & Kellner-Heinkele, В. (2001). Politics of language in the ex-Soviet Muslim states: Azerbayjan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  14. Malakhov, V.S., & Letnyakov, D.E. (2023). Colonial analogy: On the benefits and harms of the language of postcolonial studies in the post-Soviet context. Polis. Political studies, (6), 113–127. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.06.09
  15. Nadein-Raevsky, V.A. (2022). History of Pan-Turkism and its modern supporters. Part 2. New stage of pan-Turkic hopes. Perspectives. Electronic journal, (2), 94–108. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32726/2411-3417-2022-2-94-108
  16. Oskolkov, P.V. (2021). Essays on ethnopolitical science. Moscow: Aspect Press P se. (In Russian).
  17. Pochta, Y.M. (2020). Educational migration in Russia in the context of the transition of Turkicspeaking post-Soviet countries to the Latin alphabet. In M.M. Mchedlova (Ed.), Educational migration in the modern world: subjects, strategies, values (pp. 146–170). Moscow: RUDN. (In Russian).
  18. Salehi, S. (2020). Building a nation: The significance of Turkish language reforms of early republican Turkey in the creation of the modern Turkish nation-state. University of Toronto libraries. Retrieved January 31, 2024, from https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/nmcjournal/article/view/33602/26522
  19. Siefkes, M. (2010). Power in society, economy, and mentality: Towards a semiotic theory of power. Semiotica. (181), 225–261.
  20. Tsibenko, V.V. (2023). A century of the formation of the paradigm of historical consciousness in the Turkish Republic: main actors and basic plots. Middle and Post-Soviet East, 4(4), 42–63. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31249/j.2949-2408.2023.04.03
  21. Yapıcı, U. (2015). Türkiye’nin Güney Kafkasya politikası (1989–1993). Alternatif politika, (3), 425–456.

Copyright (c) 2024 Pochta Y.M., Guzaerov R.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies