‘Following the Straight Path’: Egypt Political Regime’s Quest for Political Legitimacy

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the sources of the Egyptian regime’s legitimacy after the removal of Mohammed Morsi from office in 2013. The ruling elite, in particular President alSisi, has recently shown a growing inclination towards adopting Islam in the political discourse. As a result, there is a need to examine the factors that have contributed to this trend. The central hypothesis of the research is that the government, lacking institutional legitimacy, is compelled to reinforce the Islamic values in political communication to overcome internal political divisions and establish a sense of social connection between the authorities and citizens. To test this hypothesis, the study employs a qualitative content analysis of speeches made by President alSisi to the nation between 2014 and 2023. The analysis identifies four techniques for legitimation (mobilization, national identity consolidation, construction of a common past, and construction of a common future) and examines the functional role of Islam in each of them. The findings of the study suggest that Islamic norms and values are most actively appealed to in segments of texts devoted to national identity consolidation and constructing a common future. Both approaches involve a similar strategy of invoking Islam by associating and transferring attributes within pairs of words (religious context - secular context): nation - the Ummah; state - Islamic world; citizen - a Muslim. By using this rhetorical strategy, the government is shaping a narrative that places the contemporary Egyptian state within a religious and historical framework, as depicted in the Qur’an. This approach is aimed at establishing a set of values that can unite the nation and foster loyalty among citizens towards the government’s vision for Egypt’s future. However, there are almost no semantic sections dedicated to mobilizing citizens in the texts. This can be attributed to a pragmatic effort to steer clear of politicizing the electorate.

About the authors

Alexander S. Kozintsev

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: kozintsev.a.s@my.mgimo.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8037-1466
SPIN-code: 4133-4085

PhD Candidate, Comparative Politics Department

Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Alikberov, A.K. (2019). Changing values of the category “Other” in religious spheres. A phenomenon of communication as seen from historical prospective. Minbar. Islamic Studies, 12(2), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2019-12-2-364-372
  2. Berger, P.L. (2011). The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Open Road Media. Retrieved from https://books.google.ru/books?id=WcC-AYOq6Q4C
  3. Dijk, T.A. van. (1989). Language. Cognition. Communication. Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).
  4. Givon, T. (1986). Prototype: Between Plato and Wittgenstein. In C. Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 381–400). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
  5. Hanieh, A. (2016). Beyond authoritarianism: Rethinking Egypt’s ‘Long Revolution’. Development and Change, 47(5), 1171–1179.
  6. Heydemann, S., & Leenders, R. (2011). Authoritarian Learning and Authoritarian Resilience: Regime Responses to the ‘Arab Awakening’. Globalizations, 8(5), 647–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2011.621274
  7. Joya, A. (2020). The military and the state in Egypt: Class formation in the post-Arab uprisings. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 47(5), 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2018.1509692
  8. Joffé, G. (2021). Authoritarian resilience and the absence of democratic transition: The implications of 2011. Journal of Islamic Studies, 33(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etab051
  9. Kharitonova, O.G. (2022). Typologies of political regimes in the struggle for meanings within Arab regime dynamics. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 23(3), 48–66. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-23-3-48-66
  10. Kozintsev, A.S. (2020). Institutionalization of Islamist parties in the process of nation-building: The case of the Moroccan party of justice and development. Political science (RU), 1, 258–280. (In Russian). http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2020.01.10.
  11. Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  12. Kudryashova, I.V. (2015). Arab nation-state begore and after ‘Arab Spring’. Perspektivy. Elektronnyj zhurnal, 3, 38–62. (In Russian).
  13. Kudryashova, I.V., & Kozintsev, A.S. (2023). Revisiting cleavage structures: Islamic parties and nation-state formation in the Arab world. Polis. Political Studies, 3, 50–69. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.03.05
  14. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2011). Metaphors we live by: With a new afterword. University of Chicago Press.
  15. Luhmann, N. (1986). The theory of social systems and its epistemology: Reply to Danilo Zolo’s critical comments. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 16(1), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839318601600110
  16. Mako, S., & Moghadam, V.M. (2021). After the Arab uprisings: Progress and stagnation in the Middle East and North Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Semenenko, I. (Ed.). (2012). Political Identity and Identity Politics, Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russian).
  18. Omelicheva, M.Y. (2016). Islam and power legitimation: Instrumentalization of religion in Central Asian States. Contemporary Politics, 22(2), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1153287
  19. Pace, E. (2011). Religion as communication: God’s Talk (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
  20. Reyes, A. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society, 22(6), 781–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927
  21. Sedgwick, M. (2010). Measuring Egyptian regime legitimacy. Middle East Critique, 19(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2010.514474
  22. Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813070719864
  23. Yefet, B., & Lavie, L. (2021). Legitimation in post-revolutionary Egypt: Al-Sisi and the renewal of authoritarianism. Digest of Middle East Studies, 30(3), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/dome.12244

Copyright (c) 2024 Kozintsev A.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies