Protest and Trust in the Volgograd Region: Peculiarities of the Regional System of Political Communication

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The institutionalization of public space in the subjects of the Russian Federation is characterized by the alignment of regional systems of political communication, which have both common basic structural elements and specific parameters determined by several factors and conditions. The article analyzes the emergence and development of the system of political communication between the institutions of regional power (primarily the executive power) and citizens in the Volgograd Region amidst the growing influence of global problems (such as the spread of COVID-19), the conduct of the special military operation in Ukraine, international sanctions against Russia, etc. At the same time, the novelty of the authors’ approach lies not so much in the study of the information and communication openness in the regional politics, but in identifying the nature of civil and political trust between the leading actors of communication in the Volgograd Region. Combining the action and political-communicative approaches allowed the authors to build a methodological strategy for the analysis of institutional and non-institutional actors of regional public policy that have different resources affecting the level and dynamics of mutual trust in the communication process. The paper argues that at present both the political activity, including the protest of the population, and the ability to reproduce sustainable and stable development are largely depending on the level of mutual trust between the regional authorities and the citizens. The authors attempt to identify the dominant factors that determine the vectors of trust and confrontation in the regional system of political communications.

About the authors

Sergey A. Pankratov

Volgograd State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: pankratov@volsu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1733-730X

Doctor of Political Science, Professor of the Department of Sociology and Political Science

Volgograd, Russian Federation

Kirill M. Makarenko

Volgograd State University

Email: makarenko_km@volsu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1161-5719

Senior Lecturer, Department of Sociology and Political Science

Volgograd, Russian Federation

References

  1. Baykov, N.M. (2018). Trust as a fundamental basis of civil society. Power and Administration in the East of Russia, 1 (82), 55–64. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.22394/1818-4049-2018-82-1-55-64
  2. Gavrilov, S.D., & Makarenko, K.M. (2020). Character of Protest Political Mobilization in the Regional Public Space of Volgograd Region. Science Journal of VolSU. History. Area Studies. International Relations, 25(3), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2020.3.17 (In Russian).
  3. Kozyreva, P.M., & Smirnov, A.I. (2014). On the limits of political trust. Vlast’, (5), 5–10. (In Russian).
  4. Latov, Yu.V. (2021). Institutional Trust as a Social Capital in Modern Russia (on the Results of Monitoring). Polis. Political Studies, (5), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.05.11 (In Russian).
  5. Maksimov, A.M. (2011). Regional political communications under the Russian political system’s transformation. Belgorod State University. Scientific Bulletin. Series: History. Political science, 1(96), 204–211. (In Russian).
  6. Neville, L. (2012). Do economic equality and generalized trust inhibit academic dishonesty? Evidence from state-level search-engine queries. Psychological Science, 23(4), 339–345.
  7. Pankratov, S.A., Morozov, S.I. (2021). “Distant” communication: the transformation of the interaction of Russian society and government in the era of a global pandemic. Science Journal of VolSU. History. Area Studies. International Relations, 26(3), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2021.3.15 (In Russian).
  8. Rozanova, N.N. (2014). Information openness as the most important meaningful characteristic of the reputation of regional authorities. Age of Quality, (3), 10–14. (In Russian).
  9. Semenov, A.V. (2018). Protest activity of Russians in 2012–2013. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], (11), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250002785-6 (In Russian).
  10. Sønderskov, K.M., & Dinesen, P.T. (2016). Trusting the State, Trusting Each Other? The Effect of Institutional Trust on Social Trust. Polit Behavavior, 38, 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9322-8.
  11. Tamitsky, A.M. (2006) Regional authorities as an actor of information policy. Vestnik of Pomor University. Series “Humanitarian and Social Sciences”, (8), 256–261. (In Russian).
  12. Thöni, C., Tyran, J. R., & Wengström, E. (2012). Microfoundations of social capital. Journal of Public Economics, 96(7), 635–643.

Copyright (c) 2022 Pankratov S.A., Makarenko K.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies