‘New’ Russian North: The Historical Province Amidst оf Social and Political Problems

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

This article analyzes the nature of colonization processes in the European north of Russia in different eras. Special consideration is given to the problematic nature of modern demographic and social processes and their ethno-cultural component. Significant attention is paid to the analysis of the nature of the social and cultural development in the European North in previous eras and to the rethinking of existing interpretations of the process of the socialist industrialization in this area. It is demonstrated that from the standpoint of the general sociological approach, this industrialization cannot be viewed as a process of modernization, and therefore it would be more correct to speak of the next stage of colonization, the penal one. In the late Soviet period, a transition to a new model of the regional development took place. However, this new model presupposed neither the civil integration nor the formation of rooted societies. Strong rooted territorial communities with a clearly defined identity have not formed in the northern republics and oblasts. It is shown that there is an urgent need to form a new model for the development of the European north, using both the resource of cultural heritage and modern approaches to the formation of the industrial and social environment. In addition, the need for a large-scale renewal of the regional political elites as well as the very principles of their formation is becoming more and more obvious. The work uses comparative historical and ethnographic methods, the provisions of migration theory, the statistical and sociological methods (mass polls), as well as political and sociological approaches to understanding social conflict. As for the political science approaches, the article is based on the provisions of rational choice theory.

About the authors

Yury P. Shabaev

Federal Research Center Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: yupshabaev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0867-4662

Doctor of Historical Sciences, Head of the Sector of Ethnography of the Institute of Language, Literature and History

Syktyvkar, Russian Federation

References

  1. Belyaev, D.P. (2010). The initial stage of colonization of Murmansk and the Novaya Zemlya archipelago in the second half of the XIX — early XX centuries: from plans to the embodiment of the idea. Living in the North Almanac (pp. 30–34). Issue 1. Murmansk: MSPU. (In Russian)
  2. Brettell, C.B., & Hollifiel, J.F. (Eds.) (2000). Migration Theory: Talking across disciplines. New York and London: Routledge.
  3. Kangaspuro, M. (1997). The rise and fall of the “Red Finns”. North, (11–12), 112–118. (In Russian)
  4. Kauppala, P. (2006). Comparative analysis of models of national-state construction of Komi and Karelian autonomy in the conditions of the NEP (in the context of the experience of the Grand Duchy of Finland). In History and modern development of the Komi Republic as part of the Russian Federation. (pp. 14–22). Syktyvkar: ILLH KarRC RAS. (In Russian)
  5. Korotaev, V.I. (1998). The Russian North in the late XIX — early XX century: Problems of modernization and social ecology. Arkhangelsk: Publishing House of the Pomorsky University.
  6. Kustyshev, A.N. (2011). Refusals to work in GULAG camps in the European north of Russia. In History and prospects of development of the northern regions of Russia: the role of the Gulag, memorial activities (pp. 24–28). Syktyvkar: ILLH KarRC RAS. (In Russian)
  7. Sarv, H. (1994). Finno-Ugric Peoples of Russia in the course of centuries. In Finno-Ugric peoples and Russia (pp. 26–41). Tallinn: Institute of Jaan Tynisson. (In Russian)
  8. Shabaev, Yu. P., Birin, V. N., Mironova, N.P. et al. (2021). Youth in the political and cultural space of the republic with the Finno-Ugric population: positions, moods, risks. Moscow: RSUH. (In Russian)
  9. Shabaev, Yu., Zherebtsov, I., & Lobanova, O. (2020). Anthropology of the Polar city: identity, mental map and changing images of Vorkuta. In Anthropology of the city. Vol. 2. The Northern City: Cultural space and identity in Arctic and subarctic cities (pp. 12–50). Moscow-Syktyvkar: RSUH. (In Russian).
  10. Shabaev, Yu.P. (1998). Time of crisis and ethno-political views of youth. In Identification of identity. Vol. 2, (pp. 91–112). Moscow: IEA RAS. (In Russian).
  11. Shabaev, Yu.P. (2011). Cultural space of the “Russian North”. In Anthropology of Social change (pp. 481–496). Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russian).
  12. Shabaev, Yu.P. (2013). Cultural apocalypse or civil consolidation? Sociological studies [Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia], (3), 28–36. (In Russian).
  13. Shabaev, Yu.P. (2018). Ural peoples in the ethnopolitical landscape of Russia: regional nationalism and ethnopolitics. In Ethnic and linguistic problems in modern Russia: Regional aspects. (pp. 219–265). Moscow: RSUH. (In Russian).
  14. Shabaev, Yu.P., & Loginova, N.N. (2017). Ural peoples of Russia and Foreign Europe. Saransk: Publishing house of Mordovians University. (In Russian).
  15. Shabaev, Yu.P., & Omarov, M.A. (2021). Regionalism and Ethnicity in Russia: Historical evolution and Modern Political practices. Moscow: RSUH. (In Russian).
  16. Shabaev, Yu.P., & Podoplekin, A.O. (2017). The European North of Russia: ethnopolitics and the crisis of local communities. Political expertise: POLITEX, (1), 22–31. (In Russian).
  17. Slezkin, Yu. (2008). Arctic mirrors. Russia and the Small Peoples of the North. Moscow: New Literary Review. (In Russian)
  18. Survo, V., & Survo, A. (2009). “Centers” and “peripheries” of Finnish semiosis. In Geocultural space of the European North. Pomor readings on the semiotics of culture (Issue 4, pp. 174–190). Arkhangelsk. (In Russian).
  19. Tishkov, V.A. (1993). Strategy and mechanisms of national policy. In National Policy in the Russian Federation (pp. 8–40). Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian),
  20. Vitukhnovskaia-Kauppala, M. (2010) “Karelia for Karel!”: civil war as a catalyst of national consciousness. Ab Imperio, (4), 245–282. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2010.0110
  21. Zaloznaya, M., & Gerber, T.P. (2012). Migration as Social Movement: Voluntary Group Migration and the Crimean Tatar Repatriation. Population and Development Review, 38(2), 259–328.

Copyright (c) 2022 Shabaev Y.P.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies