TERRITORIAL AUTONOMY AND NATIONAL MINORITIES’ RIGHTS: THE KURDISH QUESTION

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

In the article, the author analyzes the Kurdish question and national minorities’ rights. The aim of the article “Territorial Autonomy and National Minorities’ Rights: the Kurdish Question” is to analyze national minorities’ legal problems and the effect of religion on their solution. Territorial autonomy as an element of the territorial structure of a state is traditionally regarded as part of the state’s jurisdiction regulated by the national constitution. The research is based on a set of scientific methods, historical and comparative-legal approaches being the key ones. The historical method, used in the study, allows us to trace the evolution of approaches to territorial autonomy standards. The comparative-legal method, in its turn, permits us to compare different law enforcement norms. The article looks at the current problems related to the Kurdish question and its resolution.

About the authors

Olga M Mescheryakova

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: om23375@gmail.com

PhD, Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Full Professor of the Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6, Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198

References

  1. Kava D. Regional and International Aspects of the Kurdish Question. Belorusskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij. 1998; 4. Available from: http://evolutio.info/content/view/204/49/. Accessed: 14.10.2018 (In Russ.).
  2. Sevres Peace Agreement and Acts Concluded in Lausanne. Translated from French. Eds. Y.V. Kluchnikov and A.V. Sabanin; preface by Y.V. Kluchnikov. Moscow: Litizdat NKID; 1927. 303 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Sokolovskij S.V. Minorities’ Rights. Anthropological, Sociological and International-Legal Aspects. Moscow: MONF; 1997. 124 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Aslan S. Incoherent State: The Controversy over Kurdish Naming in Turkey. European Journal of Turkish Studies. 2009; 10: 17—42. Available from: http://ejts.revues.org/4142. Accessed: 14.10.2018.
  5. Benedikter T. The World’s Modern Autonomy Systems. Concepts and Experiences of Regional Territorial Autonomy. Bozen/Bolzano; 2009. 305 p.
  6. Czernicka M. Realism and Liberalism in the Research Concerning Security and Security Policy of State Przegląd Europejski. 2018; 1: 39—54 (In Pol.).
  7. Gunes C. The Kurdish National Movement in Turkey: From Protest to Resistance. London and New York: Routledge; 2011. 256 p.
  8. Hannum H. Autonomy, Sovereignty and Self-Determination. The Accommodation of Conflicting Rights. Philadelphia; 1996. 552 p.
  9. Venice Commission Opinion on the Interpretation of Article 11 of the Draft Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights Appended to Recommendation 1201 of the Parliamentary Assembly (CDL-MIN(1996)4). Available from: http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/ default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-MIN(1996)00. Accessed: 14.10.2018.

Copyright (c) 2019 Mescheryakova O.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies