Comparative Analysis of Palingenesis Categories in Teachings of L.N. Tolstoy and Lao-zi
- Authors: Abramenko V.P.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of China and Contemporary Asia of Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 27, No 2 (2023): MUSLIM PHILOSOPHY: CHALLENGES OF TIME
- Pages: 361-371
- Section: HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/35003
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2023-27-2-361-371
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IVYUIC
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article deals with the issues of comparing the teachings of Tolstoy and Lao-zi according to the criterion of palingenesis, which is the basis for the construction of the entire ideological corpus of the most important treatise of Taoism “Tao de jing”. Lao-zi formulated the lapidary formula of palingenesis in the fortieth zhang of this treatise, recreating a picture of the harmonization of the Middle Kingdom, arguing that return is the movement of the Tao, and weakening is the action of the Tao. The principle of palingenesis is one of the fundamental principles for which Tolstoy uses Christological vocabulary, and Lao-zi uses embryological vocabulary. The choice of the palingenesis criterion for comparative analysis of the teachings is due to the fact that the latter works as an immutable law when setting the task of recreating harmony in social chaos. Based on the assessments of the content of the zhangs of the “Tao de jing” canon, a representative line of palingenesis elements is built: the category of knowledge/truth; the category of ignorance; the category of simplicity; the category of naturalness; the category of “baby”; the category of non-action; the category of nonviolence. The principles of Taoism are not expressed by Tolstoy with a research sequence in logical definitions, but appear as categories and trends, working in the worldview of the Yasnaya Polyana sage. In the works “What is my faith?”, “Sayings of the Chinese sage Lao-Tse”, “Non-doing”, Tolstoy's teaching is presented in its entirety and is therefore convenient for comparison with the Taoist classics. It is noted that Tolstoy's conceptual idea is based on the desire to convert people to the good - unity with all people. This orientation towards the good is nothing else than the return to man of his original nature, on the way to which the principle of palingenesis associated with the boycott of the civilization of violence is realized. The conducted research has shown that in the teachings of Lao-zi and Tolstoy, which record the experience of theoretical exploration of the world, the categories of palingenesis are common to the Russian and Chinese spirit.
About the authors
Vladimir P. Abramenko
Institute of China and Contemporary Asia of Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: ma-wlad@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6746-9028
Candidate of Sciences (Technical), Leading Research Associate, Center for the Study of Chinese Culture
32, Nakhimovsky Av., 117997, Moscow, Russian FederationReferences
- Lukyanov AE. Ancient Chinese philosophy. Part 2. Philosophy of Taoism. Moscow: IDV RAS; 2015. (In Russian).
- Lukyanov AE. Ancient Chinese philosophy. Part 3. Philosophy of Confucianism. Moscow: IDV RAS; 2017. (In Russian).
- Lukyanov AE. Tao de jing. Moscow: IDV RAS; 2008. (In Russian).
- Tolstoy LN. What is my faith? Moscow: Artistic literature; 1957. Available from: https://tolstoy.ru/online/90/23/ (accessed: 07.09.22). (In Russian).
- Lukyanov AE. Ancient Chinese philosophy. Part I. The formation of Chinese philosophy. Moscow: IDV RAS; 2012. (In Russian).
- Tolstoy LN. Non-doing. Moscow: Artistic literature; 1954. Available from: https://tolstoy.ru/online/90/29/ (accessed: 12.08.22). (In Russian).
- Rykov SJu. Ancient Chinese philosophy: a course of lectures. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy RAS; 2012. (In Russian).
- Jan Hin-shun. The ancient Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu and his teachings. Moscow, Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the USSR; 1950. (In Russian).
- Arkhangelsk AS. Paradoxes of the phenomenon of non- action. Scientific notes of the Tauride VI. Vernadsky National University. The series “Philosophy. Cultural studies. Political Science”. 2010;23(1):30—35. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ paradoksy-fenomena-nedeyaniya (accessed: 14.09.22). (In Russian).
- Tolstoy LN. Sayings of Lao-Tze. Moscow: Artistic literature; 1956. Available from: https://tolstoy.ru/online/90/40/ (accessed: 09.07.22) (In Russian).