The Birth of Christianity from the Spirit of the Roman Empire. A Paradoxical View of the Religious Development of Europe in the Works of F.F. Zelinski

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The article analyzes the original concept of the development of ancient religions and the emergence of Christianity set out in the six-volume work of F.F. Zelinski History of Ancient Religions. Zelnski refutes the well-established idea of the origin of Christianity from Judaism and proves that it was based on the Hellenistic-Roman religion of the early Roman Empire. In this religion, a idea of monotheistic and pantheistic God was formed, which is the basis of all world processes and human actions, at the same time the idea arose of the possibility of a "particle" of God entering a separate human personality (the personality of the emperor). According to Zelinski, it was these ideas that became the basis of Christianity, which radically rethought them, but nevertheless left them close to the beliefs of the majority of the citizens of the Roman Empire; that is why early Christianity quickly spread throughout the empire. The article suggests that Zelinski's flight from Bolshevik Russia in the 1920s and his life in the Polish Catholic environment led to the fact that he refused to develop his ideas to their natural outcome, which could conflict with Catholic teaching. The article reconstructs the result that Zelnski should have come to with the consistent implementation of his ideas: he would have to admit that the teachings of Jesus Christ and early Christianity which arose from the Roman religion and not from Judaism coincides with that religious tradition which the Catholic Church has persecuted in a story called the Gnostic heresy.

About the authors

Igor I. Evlampiev

Saint Petersburg State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: yevlampiev@mail.ru
D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor, Institute of Philosophy 7/9 Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

References

  1. Zelinsky FF. History of ancient religion. Volume 1—3. St. Petersburg: Quadrium; Aletheia; 2014. (In Russian).
  2. Zelinsky FF. History of ancient religions. Volume 4. St. Petersburg: Quadrium; 2016. (In Russian).
  3. Zelinsky FF. History of ancient religions. Volume 5. In 2 books. Book 1. St. Petersburg: Quadrium; 2018. (In Russian).
  4. Zelinsky FF. History of ancient religions. Volume 5. In 2 books. Book 2. St. Petersburg: Quadrium; 2018. (In Russian).
  5. Zelinsky FF. History of ancient religions. Volume 6. In 2 books. Book 1. St. Petersburg: Quadrium; 2019. (In Russian).
  6. Zelinsky FF. History of ancient religions. Volume 6. In 2 books. Book 2. St. Petersburg: Quadrium; 2019. (In Russian).
  7. Drozdova SYu. F.F. Zelinsky about the role of the Roman religion in the genesis of European Christianity. Philosophical Sciences. 2008;(10):138—151. (In Russian).
  8. Novikova MV, Perfilova TB. Ancient religiosity as interpreted by F.F. Zelinsky. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2010;(2):7—22. (In Russian).
  9. Perfilova TB. Emanation of the “collective soul” of a man of antiquity in the scientific reflections of F.F. Zelinsky. Yaroslavl: YaGPU Publ.; 2009. (In Russian).
  10. Zelinsky F.F. Rome and its religion. In Zelinsky FF. From the history of ideas. In 4 volumes. Volumes 3—4. Moscow: Ladomir; 1995. P. 1—87. (In Russian).
  11. Tantlevsky I.R., Evlampiev I.I. A living person against the laws of the Cosmos: Hebrew and Ancient Greek components of the European worldview. ΣΧΟΛΗ. Philosophical studies of antiquity and classical tradition. 2021;15(1):108—125. https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2021-15-1-86-107 (In Russian).
  12. Klinghardt M. Marcion's Gospel and the New Testament: Catalyst or Consequence? New Testament Studies. 2017;63(2):318—323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688516000461
  13. Evlampiev I.I., Smirnov V.N. Dostoevsky's Christianity. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2021;25(1):44—58. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2021-25-1-44-58
  14. Lvov A.A. The specificity of historical-philosophical research in the Humanities. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies. 2021;37(3):449—463. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.307 (In Russian).

Copyright (c) 2022 Evlampiev I.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies