The Problem of Demarcation of Information Conflicts: Philosophical-Methodological Analysis

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The phenomenon of information conflict at the moment is an actual research object of many social and humanitarian disciplines. On the other hand, there is a lack of fundamental theoretical, primarily philosophical and methodological, research on this issue. This is expressed, inter alia, in the absence of philosophical and methodological grounds for isolating an information conflict from the totality of all objectively observed communications, i.e. demarcation of the phenomenon. The problem of finding criteria for an information conflict is of key importance in the formation of the methodological foundations and categorical apparatus for studying this phenomenon. In this regard, the need to develop theoretical foundations for the demarcation of information conflict is an urgent research task. The object of this work is the phenomenon of information conflict as part of the communicative process. The subject of the research is the problem of demarcation of information conflicts from all aggregate communications. The purpose of the study is to describe and substantiate the existing object-oriented methodologies that allow for the demarcation procedure. The following tasks are adequately formulated for the purpose of the study: 1) describe the problem of demarcation; 2) identify the communicative grounds of the information conflict; 3) analyze and highlight the main approaches to the problem of demarcation of information conflict. The novelty of the work lies in the systematic description and structuring of methodological approaches to the problem of demarcation of information conflicts, as well as analysis of the boundaries of methodologies and approaches. In the course of the work, it was determined and proved that, relying solely on the theory of communication, it is impossible to adequately carry out the demarcation procedure; it is necessary to use additional, non-communicative demarcation criteria, which is due to the variety of demarcation approaches in various studies. In conclusion, conclusions are formulated about the limitations of object-oriented approaches for solving the problem of demarcation of information conflicts.

About the authors

Nicolay A. Zubkov

MIREA - Russian Technological University

Author for correspondence.
Email: zubkov.official@gmail.com

graduate student, Assistant of the Department of Humanitarian and Social science, Institute of Management Technology

78, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation

Elena A. Nikitina

MIREA - Russian Technological University

Email: nikitina@mirea.ru

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Humanitarian and Social science, Institute of Management Technology

78, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation

References

  1. Pocheptsov GG. Informatsionnye voiny [Information war]. Moscow: Refl book; Kiev: Wackler; 2000. (In Russian).
  2. Griffin E. Kommunikatsiya: teorii i praktiki [Communication: theory and practice]. Kharkiv: Humanitarian Center; 2015. (In Russian).
  3. Rossius YG. O teorii interpretatsii EH. Betti [On the theory of interpretation of E. Betty]. History of Philosophy. 2012;(17):83—89 (In Russian).
  4. Guseyeva SS, Tulchinsky GL. Problema ponimaniya v filosofii: filosofsko-gnoseologicheskii analiz [The problem of understanding in philosophy: philosophical and epistemological analysis]. Moscow: Publishing house of political literature; 1985. (In Russian).
  5. Gulevich OA. Psikhologiya kommunikatsii [Psychology of Communications]. Moscow: Psychological and Social Institute; 2007. (In Russian).
  6. Nicitina EA. Poznanie. Soznanie. Bessoznatel'noe. [Cognition. Consciousness. The unconscious]. Moscow: Librocom; 2018. (In Russian).
  7. Zimbardo F, Leippe M. Sotsial'noe vliyanie [Social Influence]. St-Petersburg: Peter; 2001. (In Russian).
  8. Doktrina informatsionnoi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Doctrine of Information Security of the Russian Federation]. URL: https://rg.ru/2016/12/06/doktrina-infobezobasnost-site-dok.html (accessed: 12.04.2019).
  9. National Cyber Strategy of the United States of America. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/National-Cyber-Strategy.pdf (accessed: 01.03.2019).
  10. Declaration on Fundamental Principles Concerning the Contribution of the Mass Media to Strengthening Peace and International Understanding, to the Promotion of Human Rights, and to Countering Racialism, Apartheid and Incitement to War. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/st_hr1_141.shtml (accessed: 21.07.2019).
  11. Lasswell G. Tekhnika propagandy v mirovoi voine [Technique of propaganda in the World War]. Available from: https://cardkit.ru/sites/default/files/page/files/ tehnika_propagandi_v_mirovoy_voyne_file.pdf (accessed: 12.04.2019).
  12. Nikolaychuk IA. Politicheskaya mediametriya. Zarubezhnye SMI i bezopasnost' Rossii [Political mediametry. Foreign Media and the Security of Russia] Moscow: RISI Publ.; 2015. (In Russian).
  13. Dilami F, Poplavskaya NV. Ispol'zovanie metoda kontent-analiza dlya informatsionnoi politiki amerikanskikh SMI v otnoshenie Irana [Using the method of content analysis for the information policy of the American media in relation to Iran]. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism. 2012;(4):115—123 (In Russian).
  14. Reznichenko DV, Kashtalyanova YV. Priemy informatsionnoi voiny v sovremennykh SMI (na primere politicheskogo konflikta Rossii i Ukrainy v 2014-2015 gg.) [Techniques of the information war in modern media (for example, the political conflict between Russia and Ukraine in 2014-2015)]. Discourse-P. 2016;22:18—26. (In Russian).
  15. Romashkina NP, Peresypkina OV. Information-psychological impact during the crisis in Ukraine: Lessons for Russia. Information war. 2016; 1 (37): 42—54 (In Russian).
  16. Manoylo AV. Informatsionno-psikhologicheskoe vozdeistvie v period krizisa na Ukraine: Uroki dlya Rossii [Information warfare and psychological operations. Guide to action]. Moscow. Hotline-Telecom; 2018. (In Russian).
  17. Tsyganov VV, Bukharin SN. Informatsionnye voiny v biznese i politike: teoriya i metodologiya [Information wars in business and politics: theory and methodology]. Moscow. Academic Project, 2007. (In Russian).
  18. Sharikov AP. Problemy informatsionnoi bezopasnosti v politsentrichnom mire [Problems of Information Security in the Polycentric World]. Moscow. Publishing house “All World”; 2015. (In Russian).
  19. Sundiev IY, Smirnov AA. Teoriya i tekhnologii sotsial'noi destruktsii (na primere ‘tsvetnykh revolyutsii’) [Theory and technology of social destruction (for example, «color revolutions»)]. Moscow. Russian Biographical Institute, Institute of Economic Strategies; 2016. (In Russian).
  20. Suleymanova SS, Nazarova EA. Informatsionnye voiny: istoriya i sovremennost' [Information warfare: history and modernity]. Moscow. International Publishing Center «Ethnosocium»; 2017. (In Russian).
  21. Tailor PM. Munitions of the Mind. A history of propaganda from the ancient world to the present era. URL: https://cryptome.org/2013/01/aaron-swartz/Mind-Munitions.pdf (accessed: 20.08.2018).

Copyright (c) 2021 Zubkov N.A., Nikitina E.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies