THE LAW OF THE FUTURE: SEARCHING FOR NEW TRUTHS OR CONSERVING TRADITIONAL VALUES?

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The digitalization of the economy and society, the introduction of artificial intelligence in human activities actualize a number of new issues related to both the legal support of these processes, and areas of development of law as a regulatory system, and the relationship between law and technology. Understanding of law in conjunction with other social institutions determines its role not only as a normative regulator, but as a cultural and historical phenomenon. The aim of the article is to analyze the problem of changing the value (ethical and moral) element of law in the context of technology development. The investigation will be based on an interdisciplinary approach. The author concludes that the progress of law is defined by the values protected by it, which traditionally includes justice, equality, good faith, common sense, etc. The transformation of human-technology relations at the present stage raises the question of moving toward technological humanism or turning to traditional humanism. The author formulates the hypothesis that the law in its value component cannot be replaced by artificial intelligence. The research studies the forms of securing value ideas in international law. By the example of international acts and case law it is shown that international organizations are in search of a balance between the use of artificial intelligence and respect for human rights. It is concluded that the law is able to maintain its essential foundation without turning into technology, addressing universal principles of law, and searching for the balance between scientific and technological progress and human rights.

About the authors

Elena E. Rafalyuk

The Secretariat of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union

Author for correspondence.
Email: rafaliuk_e@mail.ru

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Counsel of the Expert-Analytical Department of the Secretariat

5 Kirova str., Minsk, 220006, Republic of Belarus

References

  1. Alekseev, S.S. (2019) Social'naya cennost' prava v sovetskom obshchestve [The social value of law in Soviet society]. S. S. Alekseev; Foreword by S. A. Stepanov; Introductory article by A.P. Semitko. Yekaterinburg: University of the Humanities. LXXX. (Series “Purpose and Power of Law”). (in Russian).
  2. Antonov, M.V., Polyakov, A.V., Chestnov, I.L. (2013) Kommunikativnyi podhod i rossiiskaya teoriya prava [The communicative approach and the Russian theory of law]. Jurisprudence. 6 (311), 78–95. (in Russian).
  3. García Cívico, J. (2018) Derecho y cultura: una dimensión cultural del derecho. Anuario Facultad de Derecho — Universidad de Alcalá XI. 3–43. (in Spanish).
  4. Häberle, P. (2002) Pluralismo y Constitución. España. Editorial: Tecnos. (in Spanish).
  5. Häberle, P. (2006) Verdad y Estado constitucional. México D.E., Instituto de investigaciones jurídicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. (in Spanish).
  6. Häberle, P., Kotzur, M. (2003) De la soberanía al derecho común: palabras clave para un diálogo europeo-latinoamericano. México: UNAM. (in Spanish).
  7. Efremov, I.A. (2017) Lezvie britvy [Razor blade]. Saint-Petersburg, “Alphabet-Atticus” Publ. (in Russian).
  8. Harris, DJ, O’Boyle, М, Warbrick, C. (1995) Law of the European Convention on human rights. Butterworths, London, Dublin, Edinburgh.
  9. Ivin, A.A. (ed.) (2004) Filosofiya: Enciklopedicheskii slovar' [Philosophy: Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, Gardariki Publ. (in Russian).
  10. Il'ichyov, L.F., Fedoseev, P.N., Kovalyov, S.M., Panov, V.G. (eds.) (1983) Filosofskii enciklopedicheskii slovar' [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia Publ. (in Russian).
  11. Karpov, V.E., Gotovcev, P.M., Rojzenzon, G.V. (2018) K voprosu ob etike i sistemah iskusstvennogo intellekta [To the question of ethics and artificial intelligence systems]. Philosophy and Society. (2), 84–105. (in Russian).
  12. Kasavina, N.A. (2018) Chelovek i tekhnika: ambivalentnost' elektronnoi kul'tury [Man and technology: the ambivalence of electronic culture]. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.(55) 4, 129–142. (in Russian).
  13. Khabrieva, T.Ya. (2018) Law Facing the Challenges of Digital Reality. Journal of Russian Law. (9), 5–16. doi: 10.12737/art_2018_9_1. (in Russian).
  14. Khalin, V.G., Chernova, G.V. (2018) Digitalization and its impact on the russian economy and society: advantages, challenges, threats and risks. Administrative Consulting. (10), 46–63. (in Russian).
  15. Krawietz, W. (1998) Sistemas jurídicos modernos en transición. Sobre la comunicación jurídica en las teorías contemporáneas de las normas y de la acción. Doxa. Universidad de Alicante. Área de Filosofía del Derecho. (21), 1. 123–143. (in Spanish).
  16. Minsky, M. (2006) The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  17. Neznamov, A.V., Naumov, V.B. (2017) Voprosy razvitiya zakonodatel'stva o robototekhnike v Rossii i v mire [Issues of the development of legislation on robotics in Russia and in the world]. Legal Studies. (8), 14–25. (in Russian).
  18. Ponkin, I.V., Redkina, A.I. (2018) Iskusstvennyi intellekt s tochki zreniya prava [Artifi-cial Intelligence from the Point of View of Law]. RUDN Journal of Law. 22 (1), 91–109. doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2018-22-1-91-109. (in Russian).
  19. Rasheva, N.Yu., Gomonov, N.D. (2006) Cennost' prava v kontekste sistemy cennostej sovremennogo rossijskogo obshchestva [The value of law in the context of the value system of modern Russian society]. Vestnik MSTU. (9) 1, 172–181. (in Russian).
  20. Reale, M. (1985) Situación actual de la teoría tridimensional del derecho. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez. (25), 203–224. (in Spanish).
  21. Reale, M. (1997) Teoría tridimensional del Derecho: una visión integral del Derecho. Madrid. Editorial: Tecnos. (in Spanish).
  22. Rostova, N.N. (2019) Opposition «Human and Technology» as a Problem of Modern Philosophy. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii. (6) 1, 50–59. (in Russian).
  23. Sanz Larruga, J. (1997) El derecho ante las nuevas tecnologías de la información. Anuario da Facultade de Dereito da Universidade da Coruña. (1), 499–516. (in Spanish).
  24. Serrano Villafañe, E. (1973–1974) Funciones del derecho en la sociedad cambiante de nuestros dias. Anuario de filosofía del derecho. (17), 461–472. (in Spanish).
  25. Sidorova, T.A. (2018) Neuroethics: between ethics and morality. Idei i idealy = Ideas and Ideals. 2 (1), 75–99. doi: 10.17212/2075-0862-2018-2.1-75-99. (in Russian).
  26. Sinica, A.S. (2015) Moral'no-eticheskie aspekty teorii iskusstvennogo intellekta [Moral and ethical aspects of the theory of artificial intelligence]. Young scientist. (18), 419–423. (in Russian).
  27. Sinyukov, V.N. (2019) Digital Law and Problems of Gradual Transformation of the Russian Legal System. Lex Russica. 1(9), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.154.9.009018. (in Russian).
  28. Tarasov, N.N. (2019) Istoriya i metodologiya yuridicheskoj nauki: metodologicheskie problemy yurisprudencii [History and methodology of legal science: methodological problems of jurisprudence]. Moscow, Yurait Publ. (in Russian).
  29. Tikhomirov, Yu.A. (2020) Law: A Moment of Stillness or Anticipatory Impact on Social Processes. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, (4), 5–16. DOI: 10.12737/ jrl.2020.038. (in Russian).
  30. Tolstyh, V.L. (2009) Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava [International Law Course]. Moscow, Wolters Kluwer Publ. (in Russian).
  31. Vlasenko, N.A. (2012) Razumnost', pravo, pravotvorchestvo [Reasonableness, law, law-making]. Legal Technique. (6), 121–125. (in Russian).
  32. Vlasova, E.M. (2015) Izmenenie otnosheniya chelovek — tekhnika v sovremennom obshchestve: problemy novogo gumanizma [Changing the relationship between man and technology in modern society: problems of the new humanism]. International Journal of Applied and Basic Research. (1-1), 170–173. (in Russian).
  33. Vojnikanis, E.A., Semenova, E.V., Tyulyaev, G.S. (2018) Iskusstvennyi intellekt i pravo: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti samoobuchayushchihsya algoritmov [Artificial Intelligence and Law: Challenges and Possibilities of Self-Learning Algorithms]. Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series Law. (4), 137–148. (in Russian).
  34. Yakovleva, E.L. (2014) Motion vector: humanism, posthumanism, transhumanismtehnogumanizm and humanism. Baltic Humanitarian Journal. No. 2. 40–42. (in Russian).
  35. Zhilkin, V.A. (2018) Iskusstvennyi intellekt i cifrovye tekhnologii v yuridicheskoi deyatel'nosti v cifrovoi real'nosti (na primere Finlyandii) [Artificial intelligence and digital technologies in legal activities in digital reality (on the example of Finland)]. Journal of Foreign Law and Comparative Law. (5), 16–21. (in Russian).

Copyright (c) 2020 Rafalyuk E.E.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies