GENOMIC RESEARCH LEGAL REGULATION SYSTEM: EXPERIENCE OF RUSSIA AND THE USA

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

This article is devoted to the analysis of the genomic research legal regulation in the Russian Federation and the USA. In the United States, in addition to the legislation great importance is attached to medical and scientific institutions self-regulation, and such information is usually open. It is concluded that in Russia, despite the presence of both state and non-state scientific institutions engaged in genomic research, the mechanism of self-regulation as a whole is fragmented. It is also noted that Russia and the United States have specific legal regulation of these relations, which is reflected in the text of the article. For example, in the United States, unlike Russia, most organizations conducting genomic research, including genomic testing, are non-governmental. Currently, the general trend in the legal regulation of genomic research in Russia and the USA is the active development of normative legal regulation. Moreover, a significant difference in the approaches of these countries is the active role of the US states in the development of regional legal regulation on these issues. Despite the fact that Russia is a federal state, the subjects of the Russian Federation are significantly limited in the genomic research legal regulation possibilities. This is largely due to both legal and political reasons that were given in this article. In the United States, a number of statutes have been adopted at the state level that regulate genomic research in such aspects as health insurance, confidential of personal information, the prohibition of discrimination, screening of newborns, and certain types of clinical and scientific research. It should be noted that the genomic research regulation in the United States is not integrated into a single national consolidated act, which is a feature of this legal system. A comparative legal study of the fundamentals of legal regulation and self-regulation of genomic research in Russia and the USA made it possible to understand the specifics of regulation of these issues in different legal systems. The positive regulatory experience in conducting genomic research in the United States can be used to improve the regulatory framework of the Russian Federation in this area.

About the authors

Emil V. Alimov

The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: emil.alimov@gmail.com

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Researcher of Department of Constitutional Law

34, B. Cheremushkinskaya str., 117218, Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Baruch, S., Hudson, K. (2008) Civilian and Military Genetics: Nondiscrimination Policy in a PostGINA World. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 83 (4), 435–444.
  2. Branum, R., Wolf, M. S. (2015) International Policies on Sharing Genomic Research Results with Relatives: Approaches to Balancing Privacy with Access. The Journal of Law, Medicine, Ethics, 43 (3), 576–593.
  3. Collins, F. S., Jegalian K. G. (1999) Deciphering the Code of Life. Scientific American, 86–91.doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1299-86.
  4. Dubov, A. B., Dyakov, V. G. (2019) Genomic Information Security: Legal Aspects of International and National Regulation. Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). (4), 127–137. doi: 10.17803/2311-5998.2019.56.4.127-137. (in Russian).
  5. Baltimore, D. (2001) Our genome unveiled. Nature, (409), 814–816.
  6. Knoppers, B. M., Dam, A. (2011) Return of Results: Towards a Lexicon? Journal of Law, Medicine, Ethics, 39 (4), 577–582.
  7. Lefebvre, K. (2015) Genetic Discrimination Law in the United States: A Socioethical, Legal Analysis of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). University of Massachusetts Amherst, School of Public Policy.
  8. Lévesque, E., Joly, Y., Simard, J. (2011) Return of Research Results: General Principles and International Perspectives. Journal of Law, Medicine, Ethics, 39 (4), 583–592.
  9. Lin, Z., Owen, A. B., Altman, R. B. (2004) Genomic Research and Human Subject Privacy. Science, 305 (5681). doi: 10.1126/science.1095019.
  10. Mokhov, A. A. (2019) Cases on Prevention of Harm in the Future (on the Example of Genomic Researches and Implementation of their Results in Practice). Herald of Civil Procedure, (2), 105–120. (in Russian).
  11. Montgomery, J. (2018) Modification of the Human Genome: Human Rights Challenges Raised by Scientific and Technical Developments. European Court of Human Rights Precedents, (3), 42–56. (in Russian).
  12. Otlowski, M., Taylor, S., Bombard, Y. (2012). Genetic Discrimination: International Perspectives. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, (13), 433-454.
  13. Romanovskaya, O. V., Romanovsky, G. B. (2013) Legal regulation of genomic registration in the Russian Federation. Russian Justitia, (8), 43–46. (in Russian).
  14. Sakhipgareeva, A. R. (2019) Genomic Law Regulation in the United States of America. Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). (4), 146–151. (in Russian).
  15. Snel, В., Bork, P., Huynen, М. (2000) Genome evolution: gene fusion versus gene fission. Trends in Genetics. (6), 9–11.
  16. Tavani, H. T. (2004) Genomic Research and Data-Mining Technology: Implications for Personal Privacy and Informed Consent. Ethics and Information Technology. 6 (1), 15–28.
  17. Vasilev, S. A., Osavelyuk, A. M., Burtsev, A. K., Suvorov, G. N., Sarmanaev, S. Kh., Shirokov, A. Yu. (2019) Problems of the Legal Regulation of Diagnostics and Editing of Human Genome in the Russian Federation. Lex Russica. (6), 71–79. (in Russian).
  18. Vasiliev, G. V. (2014) Genomics. Vavilovsky Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 18 (1), 158–165. (in Russian).
  19. Venter, I. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, Pr. I., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Jandell, M., Rvans, C. A., Holt, Pr. A. (2001) The sequence of the human genome. Science, No 291, 1304–1351.
  20. Wolfsberg, T. G., Mcintyre, I., Schuler, G. D. (2001) Guide to the draft human genome. Nature, No 409, 824–826.
  21. Zawati, M. H., Knoppers, B. M. (2012) International Normative Perspectives on the Return of Individual Research Results and Incidental Findings in Genomic Biobanks. Genetics in Medicine, 14 (4), 484–489.
  22. Zawati, M. H., Van Ness, B., Knoppers, B. M. (2012) Incidental Findings in Genomic Research: A Review of International Norms. GenEdit, 9 (1), 1–8.

Copyright (c) 2019 Alimov E.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies