Projecting ‘Hybrid Warfare’: Western Discursive Representation of Chinese Foreign Policy

封面

如何引用文章

详细

China is the single largest state-based international actor that is a major threat to the continued hegemony of the United States’ unipolar order. As such, a campaign of obstructive foreign policy is being waged against China through the obstructive marketing of China as a sinister threat and unreliable actor against the ‘rules-based order.’ By attempting to undermine China’s soft power potential, it is hoped that China’s global rise can be constrained and contained. Drawing on an integrative type of literature review, this article examines attempts at ‘knowledge production’ through geopolitically subjective interpretations and representations by the U.S. and its allies of the modern type of geopolitically-influenced international conflicts - hybrid warfare. In the English language imagination, hybrid warfare is a politically charged and loaded term that assumes ill intent by the user upon the intended victim. According to the research estimates by foreign experts, the current foreign policy of international activities by China displays a hybrid character. The country is publicly accused of carrying out operations in the economic, cybernetic, geographical, geopolitical, psychological, information and ideological spaces. Currently, the notion of “Chinese hybrid warfare” is starting to become an increasingly popular mass communicated trope. However, the aggravation of Sino-American relations against the backdrop of the South China Sea, the Taiwan issue and the Russian special military operation gives us an opportunity to predict that China will increasingly be projected as an increasingly dangerous source of hybrid threat in the Western-centric discourse to contain its global rise and by default to try to preserve US global hegemony through a negative information campaign.

作者简介

Greg Simons

Daffodil International University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: gregmons@yahoo.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6111-5325
SPIN 代码: 2833-6515

Adjunct Researcher, Department of Journalism, Media and Communication

Dhaka, Bangladesh

Andrei Manoilo

MGIMO University

Email: cyberhurricane@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8142-9110
SPIN 代码: 9867-9958

Dr. of Sc. (Political Science), Professor, Department of International Relations and Foreign Policy

Moscow, Russian Federation

Anna Goncharenko

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: annagoncharenko3@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-5310-0505
SPIN 代码: 4244-3486

Postgraduate Student, Faculty of Political Science

Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Caliskan, M. (2019). Hybrid warfare through the lens of strategic theory. Defence & Security Analysis, 35(1), 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2019.1565364
  2. Chakravorty, P. K. (2019). Hybrid warfare in the Sino-Indian context. CLAWS Journal, 12(2), 80-95. Retrieved from https://www.claws.in/static/PK-Chakravorty.pdf
  3. Conz, E., & Magnami, G. (2020). A dynamic perspective on the resilience of firms: A systematic literature review and a framework for future research. European Management Journal, 38(3), 400-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.004
  4. Cooper, Z., & Shearer, A. (2017). Thinking clearly about China’s layered Indo-Pacific strategy. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 73(5), 305-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2017.1364005
  5. Doshi, R. (2021). The long game: China’s grand strategy to displace American order. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197527917.001.0001
  6. Flint, C. (2016). Introduction to geopolitics. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315640044
  7. Fridman, O. (2017). Hybrid warfare or gibridnaya voyna? Similar, but different. The RUSI Journal, 162(1), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2016.1253370
  8. Heath, T. R. (2016). An overview of China’s national military strategy. In J. McReynolds (Ed.), China’s evolving military strategy (pp. 1-39). Washington, DC: The Jamestown Foundation.
  9. Hoffman, F. G. (2009). Hybrid warfare and challenges. Joint Force Quarterly, (52), 34-48.
  10. Jash, A. (2019). Fight and win without waging a war: How China fights hybrid warfare. CLAWS Journal, 12(2), 96-109. Retrieved from https://www.claws.in/static/Amrita-Jash.pdf
  11. Johnson, R. (2018). Hybrid war and its countermeasures: A critique of the literature. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 29(1), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2018.1404770
  12. Kania, E. B. (2019). Minds at war: China’s pursuit of military advantage through cognitive science and biotechnology. Prism, 8(3), 82-101. Retrieved from https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/prism/prism_8-3/prism_8-3_Kania_82-101.pdf
  13. Lanoszka, A. (2016). Russian hybrid warfare and extended deterrence in Eastern Europe. International Affairs, 92(1), 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12509
  14. Qiao, Liang, & Wang, Xiangsui. (1999). Unrestricted warfare. Beijing: PLA Literature and Arts Publishing House.
  15. Nandan, D., & Chauhan, B. (2021). Chinese hybrid warfare strategy: A threat to India’s national security. The Journal of Indian Art History Congress, 27(1), 129-137. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351660031_CHINESE_HYBRID_WARFARE_STRATEGY_A_THREAT_TO_INDIA'S_NATIONAL_SECURITY
  16. Pati, D., & Lorusso, L. N. (2018). How to write a systematic review of the literature. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 11(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586717747384
  17. Qureshi, W. A. (2020). The rise of hybrid warfare. Notre Dame Journal of International Comparative Law, 10(2), 173-208. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1124&context=ndjicl
  18. Silverman, D. (2020). Interpreting qualitative data. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  19. Simons, G. (2014). The International Crisis Group and the manufacturing and communicating of crises. Third World Quarterly, 35(4), 581-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.924062
  20. Simons, G. (2022). “Inevitable” and “imminent” invasions: The logic behind Western media war stories. Journal of International Analytics, 13(2), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-2-43-58; EDN: DWJBFK
  21. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

版权所有 © Simons G., Manoilo A., Goncharenko A., 2024

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##