Influence of Great Britain on Turkish Policy in the Transcaucasia and the Middle East
- 作者: Gasanov K.N.1
-
隶属关系:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
- 期: 卷 23, 编号 1 (2023): International Security: Global and Regional Trends
- 页面: 168-190
- 栏目: 双方关系
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/34199
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-1-168-190
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TDIIDF
如何引用文章
详细
The study explores the Turkish-British partnership. The author verifies the thesis, which gained popularity after the beginning of the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war in the Russian expert and journalistic community, that the United Kingdom had a significant impact on Türkiye’s foreign policy in order to destabilize the South Caucasus and oust Russia from the region. Some experts hypothesize that London is trying to implement the “Great Turan” project in the post-Soviet space through the hands of Ankara to the detriment of Russian interests. One of the main arguments that Türkiye’s foreign policy is managed from London is the appointment of former ambassador R. Moore, who has close contacts with Turkish President R.T. Erdogan, to the post of head of British Foreign Intelligence, MI6. To test this hypothesis, the author of the article analyzes the trade, financial, political relations between Great Britain and Türkiye, as well as the degree of similarity in their positions regarding the conflicts in Syria, Libya and Nagorno-Karabakh. The author comes to the conclusion that Great Britain and Türkiye are indeed close allies. This is confirmed by the fact that the British government lobbied Türkiye to join the EU, refrained from interfering in internal affairs, supported R.T. Erdogan during the coup attempt in 2016, and did not criticize Ankara’s pro-Azerbaijani position during the Karabakh conflict. At the same time, the lack of a high level of financial and economic interdependence, Türkiye’s desire to play an independent role in the Middle East and Transcaucasia bypassing NATO, Ankara’s close cooperation with London’s geopolitical adversary Moscow, as well as differences in approaches to the Syrian conflict allow the author to refute the thesis that that Türkiye acts as a “conduit for the interests of Great Britain.”
作者简介
Kamran Gasanov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: gasanov-kn@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9338-5856
PhD (Political Science), Senior Lecturer, Department of Theory and History of Journalism, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University); Visiting Lecturer, Higher School of Economics; Visiting Lecturer, RANEPA; Expert, Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC)
Moscow, Russian Federation参考
- Ahmad, F. (1966). Great Britain’s relations with the young Turks 1908-1914. Middle Eastern Studies, 2(4), 302-329.
- Ancak, O. (2020). Yeni avrasyacılık bağlamında Güney Kafkasya’da Türkiye ve Rusya. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 63(2), 187-212.
- Aras, B., & Akpınar, P. (2011). The relations between Turkey and the Caucasus. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 16(3), 53-68.
- Avcı, A. (2021). Güney Kafkasya ve Türkiye sosyo-ekonomik ilişkisi. Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, (5), 195-205.
- Baharçiçek, A., & Ağır, O. (2020). Türkiye - Rusya ilişkilerinde Suriye krizi baglaminda degerlendirilmesi. Analytical Politics, 1(2), 1-19.
- Balım, Ç. (2020). Perspectives on Anglo-Turkish diplomatic relations: An interview with his excellency Mr. Ümit Yalçın, the ambassador of the Republic of Turkey to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Journal of Anglo-Turkish Relations, 1(2), 87-91.
- Bilgin, M., & Morewood, S. (2004). Turkey’s reliance on Britain: British political and diplomatic support for Turkey against Soviet demands, 1943-47. Middle Eastern Studies, 40(2), 24-57.
- Boldyrev, A. V. (2020). The Turkish factor in the politics of the Great Britain and France in the interwar period. Modern and Contemporary History, 2020, (2), 175-181. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S013038640008661-5
- Chmyreva, V. А. (2021). Ukraine, Turkey, Britain: Contours of interaction, challenges and opportunities for Russia. Postsovetskie Issledovaniya, 4(3), 226-233. (In Russian).
- Cianciara, A. K., & Szymański, A. (2019). Differentiation, Brexit and EU - Turkey relations. In S. Gänzle, B. Leruth & J. Trondal (Eds.), Differentiated integration and disintegration in a post-Brexit era (pp. 182-201). London: Routledge.
- Demirel, E. (2021). Türkiye ile Libya arasinda denizcilik alaninda isbirligi. Yildiz Social Science Review, 7(2), 137-146.
- Dilek, B., & Yilmaz, Ş. (2016). Managing the transition from Pax Britannica to Pax Americana: Turkey’s relations with Britain and the US in a turbulent era (1929-47). Turkish Studies, 17(3), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2016.1165616
- Ekşi, M. (2009). Türkiye - Azerbaycan ilişkileri: Söylemden reelpolitiğe. Avrasya Etüdleri, 36(2), 95-112.
- Erarslan, F., & Özdemir, F. N. (2021). Azerbaycan - Türkiye ilişkileri önemli bir kavşak: Ikinci karabağ savaşi. Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları, 129(255), 315-334.
- Gasimzade, I. (2018). Brexit: The impact on the United Kingdom and Turkey. Uluslararası Beşeri Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi, 4(7), 1-10.
- Godovanyuk, K. A. (2021). UK - Turkey relationship in light of Brexit. Scientific and Analytical Herald of IE RAS, (1), 24-31. (In Russian). https://dx.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran120212431
- Hakura, F. (2012). UK - Turkey relations and Turkey’s regional role. Chatham House. Twelfth Report of Session 2010-12, 1-92.
- Henze, P. (2002). Turkey and the Caucasus: Relations with the new republics. In M. S. Radu (Ed.), Dangerous neighborhood (pp. 77-91). New York: Routledge.
- Korgun, İ. (2020). Türkiye Suriye ilişkileri. Ahi Evran Akademi, 1(1), 53-66.
- Krasina, E. A. (2021). Brexit outcomes: Global Britain and opposition to Russia. Vlast’, 29(4), 259-263. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v29i4.8415
- MacArthur-Seal, D.-J. (2018). Turkey and Britain: From enemies to allies, 1914-1939. Middle Eastern Studies, 54(5), 737-743. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2018.1462166
- Muradyan, I. M. (2008). The regional policy of the USA and Great Britain: Turkey - Iran - South Caucasus - the Black Sea. Yerevan: Antares publ. (In Russian).
- Okyar, O. (2017). Iran ekseninde Türkiye - Ermenistan ilişkileri: Anlaşmazliktan kazanca. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10, 1181-1206.
- Örmeci, O. (2016). Turkey - United Kingdom relations in recent years: An era of ‘Golden Age’? International Multilingual Academic Journal, 3(2), 115-139.
- Oskanian, K. (2011). Turkey’s global strategy: Turkey and the Caucasus. LSE Ideas, SR007, 23-27. London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/43497/1/Turkey% 27s%20Global%20Strategy_Turkey%20and%20the%20Caucasus%28lsero%29.pdf
- Sağlam, Z. (2006). Türkiye - ABD ilişkilerinde Suriye boyutu. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 2, 121-133.
- Sarıahmetoğlu, N. (2016). Karabağ sorununun çözüm Sürecinde Türkiye ve Rusya. Marmara Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 93-119.
- Suyundikov, S. (2021). Dağlik Karabağ savaşi’nin çözümü bağlaminda Türkiye ve Rusya. Uluslararası Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 132-145. https://doi.org/10.47088/utad.932991
- Tellel, E. (2001). Türkiye Kafkasya ve Orta Asya politikasını değiştiriyor mu? Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 56(3), 177-180. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000001838
- Vlasova, K. V., & Timchenko, V. A. (2021). The escalation of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in 2020. Turkey’s position. In Society. Science. Innovations (NPK-2021): Collection of articles of the XXI All-Russian scientific-practical conference (Vol. 1, pp. 831-838). Kirov: Vyatskii gosudarstvennyi universitet publ. (In Russian).
- Zaguljaev, A. F. (2016). The United Kingdom support for Turkey’s accession to the European Union (1997-2004). Vestnik Moskovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Lingvisticheskogo Universiteta. Obshchestvennye Nauki, (764), 93-101. (In Russian).