Key Models of Religious Institutions’ Interaction in the Context of the State-Church Relations in Russia and Egypt

封面

如何引用文章

详细

The article reveals and comparatively analyses the peculiarities of the state-church relations in Russia and Egypt. Currently, the role of religion and religious institutions in world politics is actively increasing, as well as the process of secularization of public life is being redefined. Religion still often becomes the cause of discrimination, persecution of certain groups of society; the level of Islamophobia in Western countries and Religiophobia in the whole world is not decreasing. In these conditions, the importance of state-church relations within key international actors is also growing. The purpose of the study is to provide comparative analysis of the specifics of the state religion policy of Russia and Egypt in order to develop recommendations for the use of Russian religious institutions to strengthen Russia’s position in the Middle East. Russia and Egypt were chosen as research objects, since these countries have a rich history of interaction in the religious sphere, which could become a basis for the future cooperation between religious institutions of the two countries. In addition, Egypt is one of the key states in the Middle East, where Russian influence has never been dominant, but where exactly religious organizations such as the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) most actively and successfully pursued Russia’s interests. Methodologically, the article is based on historical and empirical institutionalism, as well as comparative analysis and historical-genetic method. The study is quite novel, as it identifies four models of interaction between religious communities, which are based on two criteria: a) presence of religious institutions representing the interests of a particular community; b) status of religion in the state (dominant / minority religion). The practical significance of the study lies in its attempt to make recommendations for improving the use of religious organizations in Russia to promote state interests in Egypt on the basis of the highlighted features of state-church relations in Egypt.

作者简介

Galina Lukyanova

Рeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: lukianova-go@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4033-4852

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Head, Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

Moscow, Russian Federation

Olga Chikrizova

Рeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: chikrizova-os@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1678-0967

PhD in History, Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of International Relations

Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Aceto, C. (2017). Shi’a in Egypt. One in a hundred: Analysis of sectarianism — confronting a controversial and fragmented community. Aahrus University. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/32601963/Shi_a_in_Egypt_One_in_a_Hundred_Analysis_of_Sectarianism_Confronting_a_Controversial_and_Fragmented_Community
  2. Adjban, I. I. (2015). Relations between the two Churches — Coptic and Russian — in the 19th — 21st centuries. Cairo: Rossijskie novosti publ. (In Russian).
  3. Belyakov, V. V. (2007). The role of humanitarian ties in intercultural interaction between Russia and Egypt (late 19th — mid 20th centuries) [thesis]. Moscow. (In Russian).
  4. Belyakov, V. V. (2010). Russia and Egypt: Intercultural interaction before Khrushchev and Nasser. In V. V. Belyakov & V. V. Naumkin (Eds.), Vitaleus: a collection of articles dedicated to the 70th anniversary of V. I. Sheremet (pp. 52—64). Moscow: Institut vostokovedeniya RAN publ. (In Russian).
  5. Chikrizova, O. S. (2018). “Ecumenism” in Islam: Historical stages of overcoming the Sunni-Shiʻite antagonism. Economic, Socio-Political, Ethno-Confessional Problems of Afro-Asian Countries. Yearbook, 166—172. (In Russian).
  6. Chikrizova, O. S., & Morozova, N. N. (2020). Shiʻism in Morocco: Historical heritage and modernity. Asia and Africa Today, (5), 28—35. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750009547-3
  7. Dannenberg, A. N., & Kasatkin, P. I. (2018). The Holy See in the Holy land: History and the present. MGIMO Review of International Relations, (2), 185—200. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2018-2-59-185-200
  8. Egorin, A. Z. (1998). Egypt of our times. Moscow: IV RAN publ. (In Russian).
  9. Egorin, A. Z. (2016). Egypt — Russia: 500 years of cooperation. Kazan: Izd-vo Kazanskogo universiteta publ. (In Russian).
  10. El Masri, I. H. (1978). The story of the Copts: The true story of Christianity in Egypt. Book I: From the foundation of the Church by Saint Mark to the Arab conquest. Cairo: Middle East Council of Churches.
  11. Fahmi, G. (2019). The Rapprochement between Al-Azhar and the Vatican: Opportunities and Limits. In P. Sasnal (Ed.), Cooperation with religious institutions as a European policy tool (pp. 98—116). European Institute of the Mediterranean.
  12. Fox, J. (2015). Political secularism, religion, and the state: A time series analysis of worldwide data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Fox, J. (2019). A world survey of secular-religious competition: state religious policy from 1990 to 2014. Religion, State & Society, 47(1), 10—29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2018.1532750
  14. Grim, B. J., & Finke, R. (2006). International religion indexes: Government regulation, government favoritism, and social regulation of religion. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 2, 1—40.
  15. Gibadullin, I. R. (2013). Shiʻism in Russia: The search of appropriate model of self-constitution within Russian Muslim community. In D. V. Brilev (Ed.), Islam in a multicultural world: Muslim movements and mechanisms of the reproduction of the ideology of Islam in the modern information space: a collection of articles of the international conference (pp. 67—88). Kazan, November 14—17, 2013. Kazan: Kazanskii (Privolzhskii) federal’nyi universitet publ. (In Russian).
  16. Goryachkin, G. V. (2014). Russian presence in Palestine as a factor in the relationship between the ruling dynasties of Russia and Egypt (late 19th — early 20th centuries). Orthodox Palestinian Collection, (110), 72—78. (In Russian).
  17. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936—957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
  18. Hurd, E. S. (2017). Beyond religious freedom: The new global politics of religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  19. Kasatkin, P. I. (2011). Governance of church diaspora as a key problem of inter-Orthodox relations. Journal of Law and Administration, (4), 72—79. (In Russian).
  20. Kerimov, G. М. (1983). Problems of war and peace in Islam. Questions of Scientific Atheism, (31), 148—162. Moscow: Mysl’ publ. (In Russian).
  21. Khalil, M. A. M. (2019). Intercultural communication between Russia and Egypt in the 20th — 21st centuries: Political and religious aspects. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet publ. (In Russian).
  22. Kirillina, S. A. (2000). Russian travellers and missionary figures in Egypt in the 19th — early 20th centuries and their views on the cultural upsurge in the Arab East. In Russia and the East: a view from Siberia at the end of the century: materials and abstracts of reports for the international scientific-practical conference. Irkutsk, May 24—27, 2000: in 2 volumes. Vol. 1 (pp. 250—255). Irkutsk: Ottisk publ.
  23. Kyrlezhev, A. (2016). Orthodox commonwealth: A typology of autocephalous churches. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide, 34(1), 74—101. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2016-34-1-74-101
  24. Leustean, L. N. (Ed.) (2014). Eastern Christianity and politics in the twenty-first century. London — New York: Routledge.
  25. Martino, M. G. (2014). The State as an actor in religion policy: Policy cycle and governance perspectives on institutionalized religion. Wiesbaden: Springer.
  26. Oreshkova, S. F. (2018). The Ottoman Empire: Essays on history. Moscow: Rubezhi XXI publ. (In Russian).
  27. Peters, B. G. (2000). Institutional theory: Problems and prospects. Reihe Politikwissenschaft, 69, 1—28. Retrieved from https://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_69.pdf
  28. Petrunina, O. E., Gerd, L. A., & Vakh, K. A. (2020). The Alexandrian Patriarchate and Russia in the 19th century: Research and documents. Moscow: Indrik publ. (In Russian).
  29. Pratt, D. (2010). The Vatican in dialogue with Islam: Inclusion and engagement. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 21(3), 245—262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2010.496656
  30. Pratt, D. (2015). Theology after dialogue: Christian-Muslim engagement today and tomorrow. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 26(1), 89—101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2014.965882
  31. Shakhov, M. O. (2013). Legal basis for the activities of religious associations in the Russian Federation. 2nd edition. Moscow: Izd-vo Sretenskogo monastyrya publ. (In Russian).

版权所有 © Lukyanova G.O., Chikrizova O.S., 2021

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##