The Belt and Road Initiative: A Model of China’s Investment Cooperation with Australia and New Zealand

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The large-scale Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has undergone significant expansion in recent years. In 2017, China proposed a new route including South Pacific Region (SPR) states, intended to become a “hub” for ships heading to Latin America and back. Australia and New Zealand were chosen as key partners due to their leading positions among the region’s countries and their significant influence over political processes in the SPR. The relevance of the research topic is determined by China’s growing interest in the South Pacific Region and the consequently intensifying Sino-American competition, which significantly impacts the foreign policy decisions made in Canberra and Wellington. The aim of the present study is to identify differences in the approaches in Australia’s and New Zealand’s approaches to the BRI, and the factors influencing their policies regarding the Chinese initiative. Methodologically, the research relies on a comparative analysis of investment volumes from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) into the two countries’ infrastructure projects, as well as general scientific and specific scientific methods of historical and political research, including the narrative method and case studies. The conceptual framework of the study is the theory of hegemonic stability, which allows for examining the Belt and Road Initiative as a new economic regime of an emerging hegemon - China, which seeks to attract close US partners, namely Australia and New Zealand, to its side. The author concludes that political relations do, to a certain extent, influence the volume of Chinese investments. However, despite China’s consistently stable relations with New Zealand throughout under the review period. Chinese investment volumes in Australia were significantly higher. Furthermore, no critical infrastructure project involving China was approved in New Zealand. Meanwhile, despite the significant deterioration in Sino-Australian relations and Australia’s refusal to participate in the BRI, Chinese investors made several substantial investments in the Australian economy between 2013 and 2018.

About the authors

Evgeniya Yu. Katkova

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: katkova_eyu@pfur.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2855-3163
SPIN-code: 6742-4740

PhD (History), Associate Professor, Department of Oriental and African Studies

10, bldg 2, Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

References

  1. Askari, M. U., & Tahir, M. (2020). Sino-US rivalry in the South China sea: A hegemonic stability theory perspective. Journal of Politics and International Studies, 6(2), 115–127.
  2. Baker, M. (2020). New Zealand’s strategic challenge: Responding to China’s new interventionist foreign policies. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, 3(1), 11–39. Retrieved from https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/JIPA/journals/Volume-03_Issue-1/Baker.pdf
  3. Cheng, T., & Li, A. (2023). Xinxilan huaqiao huaren zai zhong xin “yidai yilu” hezuo zhong de zuoyong tanxi [An analysis of the role of overseas Chinese in New Zealand in the China — New Zealand “Belt and Road” cooperation]. Huaqiao huaren zhengzhi·jingji [Overseas Chinese Journal of Bagui], 3, 42–49. (In Chinese).
  4. Clough, G. (2023). The Australia’s foreign relations act and Australia’s relationship with international law. Federal Law Review, 51(2), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205X231166158; EDN: VYBOFI
  5. Danner, L. K., & Martín, F. E. (2019). China’s hegemonic intentions and trajectory: Will it opt for benevolent, coercive, or Dutch-style hegemony? Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 6(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.273
  6. Gilpin, R. (2001). Global political economy: Understanding the international economic order. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831272
  7. He, B., Stokes, G., & Hundt, D. (2024). The politics of Australian responses to the “Belt and Road” initiative. East Asian Policy, 16(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793930524000072; EDN: WKPTMM
  8. Ju, Zh. (2020). Te’enbu’er zhengfu shiqi aodaliya dui “yidai yilu” changyi de renzhi: taidu, kunjing yu duice [Australia’s perception of the “Belt and Road” initiative during the Turnbull government: Attitudes, dilemmas and countermeasures]. Huaqiao huaren yanjiu [Chinese Overseas Studies], (1), 156–169. (In Chinese).
  9. Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820269
  10. Kindleberger, C. P. (1973). The world in depression, 1929–1939. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  11. Ning, T. (2023a). Aodaliya dui “yidai yilu” juece de zhengdang zhengzhi luoji [The party-political logic behind Australia’s decision on the “Belt and Road” Initiative]. Yinduyang jingji ti yanjiu [Indian Ocean Economic and Political Review], (6), 42–61. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.16717/j.cnki.53-1227/f.2023.06.003
  12. Ning, T. (2023b). Xinxilan guojia anquan zhanlüe: Yanjin, tiaozheng yu Shijian [New Zealand’s national security strategy: Evolution, adjustment and practice]. Guojia anquan yanjiu [National Security Study], (6), 66–84. (In Chinese).
  13. Pan, R., & Ni, Y. (2024). Longitudinal change in the attitude of Australian government towards the “Belt and Road” initiative: Stages, causes and countermeasures. Heliyon, 10(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24882; EDN: UCCGYG
  14. Simons, G., & Glaser (Kukartseva), M. A. (2024). New Zealand’s foreign policy balancing of China and the United States in the Indo-Pacific region: Narratives from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs annual reports. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 24(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2024-24-4-545-562 ; EDN: LUOURN
  15. Smith, N. S., & Holster, B. (2023). New Zealand’s ‘Maori foreign policy’ and China: A case of instrumental relationality? International Affairs, 99(4), 1575–1593. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad123; EDN: TTEBAQ
  16. Steff, R. (2024). ‘Our region is now a strategic theatre’: New Zealand’s balancing response to China. The Pacific Review, 37(6), 1120–1151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2024.2314764
  17. Wallis, J., Xie, G., Waqavakatoga, W., Habru, P., & Koro, M. (2023). Ordering the Islands? Pacific responses to China’s strategic narratives. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 16(4), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poad015; EDN: OFWZYO
  18. Yi, S. (2024). Zhong mei zhanlüe jingzheng beijing xia aodaliya duiwai zhanlüe bianhua de duochong guojia shenfen ren zhi yinsu [Multiple national identity cognition factors in Australia’s foreign strategy changes under the background of Sino-US strategic competition]. Yinduyang jingji ti yanjiu [Indian Ocean Economic and Political Review], (5), 56–83. (In Chinese).
  19. Yu, H. (2024). Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9633-9
  20. Yue, Sh. (2021). Ao xin liang guo dui “yidai yilu” changyi de renzhi bijiao yu jizhi hua jianshe [Comparative study on the cognition and mechanism construction of the Belt and Road Initiative between Australia and New Zealand]. Liaoning daxue xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban) [Journal of Liaoning University (Philosophy and Social Sciences)], 49(4), 142–154. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.16197/j.cnki.lnupse.2021.04.015
  21. Zhang, T. (2024). Zhongguo — xinxilan jingmao hezuo xin jinzhan: Shenru fenxi yu qianzhan yanjiu [Study on the economic effects of China — New Zealand: Free trade zone]. Guoji shangmao [Economic Forum], 33(13), 62–65. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.19699/j.cnki.issn2096-0298.2024.13.062
  22. Zhang, Y. (2019). Shi lun “Yidai yilu” changyi zai nan taipingyang daoguo de shishi lujing [On the implementation path of the Belt and Road initiative in South Pacific Island countries]. Taipingyang xuebao [Pacific Journal], 27(1), 93–104. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.14015/j.cnki.1004-8049.2019.01.009

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 Katkova E.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.