Institutional Formation and Development of SCO Activities: Experience of Retrospective Analysis

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

This article examines the institutional development and evolution of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) from 2001 to the present day. The authors identify and characterize the stages and milestones of the organization’s development, while also examining the SCO’s regulatory framework and organizational structure. It is shown that the modern organizational structure of the SCO, formed through a process of long and contradictory evolution, includes a number of subsystems that, along with its fundamental principles of activity, ensure the SCO’s viability and development in the future. Indirect thematic content analysis of 120 official SCO documents shows the main trends of the SCO’s activities, the nature of the organization’s evolution and, ultimately, the stages of its institutional development. The first stage (2001-2004) is associated with the organization’s institutional formation, while the second stage (2004-2008) is characterized by intensive promotion and the minimal complexity of trade, economic, humanitarian and cultural initiatives. The third stage (2008-2014) shows a slight weakening of the impetus for the SCO’s development, while the fourth stage (since 2015) is associated with an attempt to bring the SCO to a qualitatively new level, demonstrating an increase in the efficiency of cooperation in all spheres. A quantitative content analysis of the frequency and dynamics of the use of representative keywords in one of the types of official documents of the SCO (declarations adopted following the summits of the heads of the member states) has made it possible to substantiate a thesis about the gradual complication, detailing, and specialization of the SCO’s activities, as well as to identify and characterize its priorities. In general, the content analysis shows that the SCO has gone through several stages in its development, characterized by qualitative specifics, while maintaining a clear priority on security issues, reflecting the significance of traditional and new threats. A conclusion is reached about the functioning of multilevel interaction on the SCO platform to ensure regional security and cooperation while simultaneously developing both multilateral (including with external actors) and bilateral formats: this indicates the formation of a new model of regionalism in an emerging multipolar world.

About the authors

Olga S. Porshneva

Ural Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: o.s.porshneva@urfu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3265-7010
SPIN-code: 1890-6840

Dr. of Sc. (History), Professor, Head, the Department of Theory and History of International Relations

Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

Sergey L. Razinkov

Ural Federal University

Email: s.l.razinkov@urfu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0018-7931
SPIN-code: 4251-2344

PhD (History), Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of International Relations

Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

References

  1. Alimov, R. K. (2018). The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and Greater Eurasia. International Organisations Research Journal, 13(3), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2018-03-01; EDN: REGQXV
  2. Aris, S. (2009). The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: ‘Tackling the three evils’. A regional response to non-traditional security challenges or an anti-Western bloc? Europe — Asia Studies, 61(3), 457–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130902753309
  3. Aris, S. (2011). Eurasian regionalism: The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307643
  4. Bin, Yu. (2013). The SCO ten years after: In search of its own identity. In M. Fredholm (Ed.), The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Eurasian geopolitics: New directions, perspectives, and challenges (pp. 29–61). Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
  5. Frolova, I. Yu. (2020). Interactions under the umbrella of the four-party mechanism of cooperation and coordination including China, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Tajikistan. National Strategy Issues, (1), 37–48. (In Russian). EDN: VJMTJH
  6. He, Baogang. (2020). Regionalism as an instrument for global power contestation: The case of China. Asian Studies Review, 44(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1691503
  7. Honrada, G. J. P., & Bokeriya, S. A. (2023). The Shanghai spirit and the ASEAN way as the foundations of a new regionalism. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 23(2), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-2-253-264; EDN: JKVFZS
  8. Koldunova, E. V. (2013). The role of Shanghai Cooperation Organization in Central Asia: Comparative analysis of research discourses. Comparative Politics Russia, 4(2), 60–69. (In Russian). EDN: RTKGHZ
  9. Kulintsev, Yu. V. (2020). The Greater Eurasian partnership: Problems of conjunction with international integration projects (on the example of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the “Silk Road Economic Belt” Initiative) [dissertation]. Moscow: Institute of African Studies of RAS. (In Russian). EDN: DNRMXJ
  10. Li, Xin, & Wang, Yu Xin. (2021). The results of the 20-year economic cooperation of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and its development prospects. Finance: Theory and Practice, 25(3), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-3-159-174; EDN: RRDJZE
  11. Lukin, A. V. (2007). The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: What next? Russia in Global Affairs, 5(3), 78–93. (In Russian). EDN: TZIZYN
  12. Luzyanin, S. G. (2017). Russia and China in the SCO 2017: Global and regional dimensions of security. In S. G. Luzyanin (Ed.), The issues in ensuring security in the territory of the SCO (pp. 19–26). Moscow: Ves’ mir publ. (In Russian).
  13. Luzyanin, S. G. (2019). SCO’s role in the global dimension of the 21st century. In Yu. V. Morozov (Ed.), Prospects for multilateral cooperation between the SCO and international structures in the interests of the organization’s strategy development (pp. 7–16). Moscow: IDV RAN publ. (In Russian). EDN: ETSAEZ
  14. Marochkin, S., & Bezborodov, Y. (Eds.). (2022). The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Exploring new horizons. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003170617
  15. Muratshina, K. G. (2017). Central Asian state’s priorities in SCO in the context of their relations with China. Herald of Omsk University. Series Historical Studies, (3), 445–456. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25513/2312-1300.2017.3.445-456; EDN: ZSUEKH
  16. Muratshina, K. G. (2018). Central Asian states and SCO enlargement. Izvestiya of Altai State University, (5), 114–118. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2018)5-20; EDN: YVNZUD
  17. Qiu, Xiaofen. (2020). Cooperation between the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation within the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Moscow: Etnosotsium publ. (In Russian).
  18. Rakhimov, K. H. (2023). Activities of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization to ensure security in Eurasia. Moscow: Ru-Science publ. (In Russian).
  19. Rakhimov, K. H., & Kurylev, K. P. (2018). The role of the SCO in ensuring the security of Central Asia. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel’skie reshenija publ. (In Russian).
  20. Rakhimov, M. (2020). Contemporary multilateral relations in Central Asia. Tashkent: Fan publ. (In Russian).
  21. Song, Weiqing. (2014). Interests, power and China’s difficult game in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Journal of Contemporary China, 23(85), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2013.809981
  22. Zeleneva, I. V., & Vlasov, A. V. (2012). The future of Energy Club the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in the context of the Eurasian integration. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, (12), 150–157. (In Russian). EDN: QAKCOR

Copyright (c) 2024 Porshneva O.S., Razinkov S.L.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies