Russia, NATO and the Arctic: Rivalry, Security, Possible Scenarios of Geopolitical Competition
- Authors: Arzhanov I.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow State University
- Issue: Vol 21, No 4 (2021): The Greater Mediterranean: Still Constructing the Macro-region
- Pages: 758-771
- Section: PEACE AND SECURITY
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/29819
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2021-21-4-758-771
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of key aspects of the geopolitical struggle for the Arctic region. The relevance of the research stems from the fact that due to climate change and the reduction of ice cover in the Northern Hemisphere, the Arctic is of increasing interest to world powers, which are competing for control over new deposits of natural resources and strategic dominance in the region. It is emphasized that the Arctic has become a region where leading states are trying to implement various geopolitical strategies. On the one hand, the four members of the Arctic Five under the auspices of NATO are trying to implement a scenario in which the polar zone is divided into stable “zones of influence.” On the other hand, there are the interests and position of Russia, which is concerned about the increased military activity of the United States and NATO in the region. The purpose of the article is to study the problems of the Arctic militarization, which will make it possible to identify challenges and threats in this region for Russia’s national strategy. The research methodology is based on theoretical analysis and dialectical method. In addition, the study used formal logical methods and various approaches to information processing (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction). The forecasting method helped to determine the range of possible military and political trends in the region. The article identifies the potential interests of Russia, the United States and NATO in the context of increased attention to the Arctic region in recent years. The study reflects a comparative analysis of the policies and interests of the member states of the Arctic Five and NATO, namely Denmark, Canada, Norway and the USA, their practical steps in the High North. The author describes possible prospects for interaction and dialogue on countering the main threats to international security within the framework of a comprehensive strategy. Considering the role and rivalry between Russia and NATO in the Arctic, the article highlights the author’s forecasts of further military and political presence of NATO in the Arctic and the necessary actions for Russia to defend its northern territories.
Keywords
About the authors
Igor A. Arzhanov
Moscow State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: yatsu@flaut.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5738-3941
Postgraduate Student, Faculty of Political Science, Department of International relations and integration processes
Moscow, Russian FederationReferences
- Bekyashev, K. A. (2015). The legal status of the Arctic Council and its role in the protection of the marine environment. Eurasian Law Journal, (5), 13—17. (In Russian).
- Bouffard, T., & Rodman, L. (2021). U.S. Arctic security strategies: Balancing strategic and operational dimensions. The Polar Journal, 11(1), 160—187. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2021.1911045
- Chabros, M. (2020). The Arctic icebreaker: Russia’s security policy in the Far North. Warsaw Institute Report. Retrieved from https://warsawinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/The-Arctic-Icebreaker-Russias-Security-Policy-in-the-Far-North.pdf
- Cross, T. (2019). The NATO alliance’s role in Arctic security. Center for International Maritime Security. Retrieved from https://cimsec.org/strategy-on-top-of-the-world-pt-2-regional-arctic-perspectives/
- Ediseeva, T. (2020). Features of sustainable development of the Arctic regions. Economy and Business: Theory and Practice, (5), 173—176. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/2411-0450-2020-10401
- Goldin, V. V. (2015). Geopolitics and foreign relations in the Arctic region, modern times and prospects. Problems and challenges for Russia. Clio, (1), 153—160. (In Russian).
- Gurganus, J., & Rumer, E. (2019). Russia’s global ambitions in perspective. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/files/RumerGurganus_Perspective_final.pdf
- Hodges, B., Bugajski, J., Wojcik, R., & Schmiedl, C. (2020). A strategy for NATO’s Eastern flank. Center for European Policy Analysis. Retrieved from https://cepa.org/cepa_files/2020-CEPA-report-one_flank_one_threat_one_presence.pdf
- Khlopov, O. A. (2020). The problems of security and a nuclear free zone in the Arctic. The Newman in Foreign Policy, 4(55), 6—11. (In Russian).
- Khlopov, O. A. (2021). Arctic strategy of Russia and NATO: Possible scenarios. Sociology, (2), 136—145. (In Russian).
- Konyshev, V. N., & Sergunin, A. A. (2018). U.S. — Russia relations in the Arctic: Cooperation or competition? Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, 62(9), 103—111. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-103-111
- Krutikov, A. V., Smirnova, O. O., & Bocharova, L. K. (2020). Strategy for the development of the Russian Arctic. Results and prospects. Arctic and North, (40), 254—269. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.40.254
- MacDonald, A. (2015). The militarization of the Arctic: Emerging reality, exaggeration, and distraction. Canadian Military Journal, 15(3), 18—28.
- Nikulin, M. A. (2019). Great powers’ competition in the Arctic: Geopolitical rivalry in the new political space. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 19(3), 392—403. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-3-392-403
- Nilsson, A. E., & Larsen, J. N. (2020). Making regional sense of global sustainable development indicators for the Arctic. Sustainability, 12(3), 10—27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031027
- Østhagen, A. (2021). Norway’s Arctic policy: still High North, low tension? The Polar Journal, 11(1), 75—94. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2021.1911043
- Pincus, R. (2020). Three way power dynamics in the Arctic. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 14(1), 40—63.
- Polovinkin, V. N., & Fomichev, A. B. (2013). Importance of the Northern and Arctic regions in new geopolitical and geo-economic conditions. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, (3), 58—63. (In Russian).
- Savoyskiy, A. G. (2012). Joint exploration of the Arctic in the improving of economic relations between Russia and the USA. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, (2), 51—59. (In Russian).
- Shuldeshov, L. S., & Fedorov, B. V. (2016). Analysis of the geopolitical situation in the Arctic region. Rossiya v Global’nom Mire, (9), 105—116. (In Russian).
- Smirnov, A. I. (2016). The Arctic: Network diplomacy 2.0 in the global security discourse. Arkhangelsk: SAFU im. M.V. Lomonosova publ. (In Russian).
- Stavridis, J. (2017). Sea power. The history and geopolitics of the world’s oceans. New York: Penguin Press.
- Szymański, P. (2021). High North, high priority — Norway and the defence of NATO’s northern flank. OSW Commentary, (393), 1—8.
- Zagorski, A. V. (2018). The Arctic defense postures in the context of the Russia — West confrontation. Arctic and North, (31), 80—97. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.31.80
- Zhuravel, V. (2016). The intensification of the activities of NATO countries in the Arctic. Zarubezhnoe Voennoe Obozrenie, (12), 14—21. (In Russian).