Regional Economic Integration in the Southern African Development Community (SADC): Analysing the Dynamics and Performance
- Authors: Muntschick J.1
-
Affiliations:
- Johannes Gutenberg-University
- Issue: Vol 20, No 2 (2020): Contemporary Area Studies: Overcoming Level-of-Analysis Eclecticism
- Pages: 333-346
- Section: THEMATIC DOSSIER
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/23974
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-2-333-346
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article analyses the dynamics and performance of regional economic integration in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). It proposes an innovative theoretical approach to the analysis of regionalism that refers to cooperation theory and takes the impact of external actors explicitly into account. The motivation for this research stems from the observation of a new wave of regionalism in the Global South. Many of these new or reformed regional integration organisations (RIOs) comprise of developing countries, particularly in Africa. In contrast to expectations of most mainstream integration theories, new regionalisms in the Southern Hemisphere have come into existence and show considerable degrees of dynamics and institutional performance. However, there is evidence that regionalisms in the Global South are less stable than in the North and not always entirely under control of regional actors only. This puzzling observation, of which the SADC gives an example, has motivated research for this article. Its central aim is to explain the recent integration dynamics and performance of the organisation in its key policy area, namely the economy. By applying a situation-structural approach to analyse and explain the development of institutionalised regional integration, the author argues that patterns of strong and asymmetric interdependence between regional and extra-regional actors may have an ambivalent impact on the genuine structure of regional cooperation problems, institution-building and institutional performance. The article illustrates and explains this on the example of SADC’s key economic integration projects: the SADC Free Trade Area and the scheduled SADC Customs Union.
About the authors
Johannes Muntschick
Johannes Gutenberg-University
Email: muntschick@uni-mainz.de
PhD (Political Science), Postdoc Research Fellow and Lecturer, Department of Political Science (International Relations Unit) Mainz, Germany
References
- Amos, S. (2010). The Role of South Africa in SADC Regional Integration: the Making or Breaking of the Organization. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 5 (03),124-131.
- Axelrod, R. & Keohane, R.O. (1985). Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics, 38 (1), 226-254. doi: 10.2307/2010357
- Axline, W.A. (1994). The Political Economy of Regional Cooperation. Comparative Case Studies. London: Pinter Publishers and Associated University Press.
- Bach, D. (2003). New Regionalism as an Alias: Regionalisation through Trans-State Networks. In: Grant, J.A. & Söderbaum, F. (Eds.). New Regionalism in Africa. Aldershot: Ashgate. P. 21-30.
- Bergmann, J. & Niemann, A. (2015). Mediating International Conflicts: The European Union as an Effective Peacemaker? Journal of Common Market Studies, 53 (05), 957-975. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12254
- Bilal, S. & Stevens, C. (2009). The Interim Economic Partnership Agreements between the EU and African States. Contents, Challenges and Prospects. Maastricht: European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM).
- Börzel, T.A. & Risse, T. (2009). Diffusing (Inter-)Regionalism. The EU as a Model of Regional Integration. KFG Working Paper. Berlin: KFG “The Transformative Power of Europe”.
- Cleary, S. (1999). Regional Integration and the Southern African Development Community. Journal of Public and International Affairs, 10 (01), 1-15.
- Doidge, M. (2011). The European Union and Interregionalism. Farnham: Ashgate.
- Draper, P. & Khumalo, N. (2009). The Future of the Southern African Customs Union. Trade Negotiations Insights, 8 (06), 4-5.
- Flatters, F. (2004). SADC Rules of Origin in Textiles and Garments: Barriers to Regional Trade and Global Integration. In: Commonwealth Secretariat. The Impact of Preferential Rules of Origin in the Textile and Clothing Sector in Africa. London: Commonwealth Secretariat. P. 41-66. DOI: 10.14217/ 9781848598454-3-en
- Gehring, T. (1994). Der Beitrag von Institutionen zur Förderung der internationalen Zusammenarbeit. Lehren aus der institutionellen Struktur der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 1 (02), 211-242
- Grobbelaar, N. (2004). Can South African Business Drive Regional Integration on the Continent? South African Journal of International Affairs, 11 (02), 91-106. doi: 10.1080/10220460409545469
- Haas, E.B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces 1950-1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Hettne, B. & Söderbaum, F. (1998). The New Regionalism Approach. Politeia: Journal for Political Science and Public Administration, 17 (03), 5-19.
- Keck, A. & Piermartini, R. (2008). The Impact of Economic Partnership Agreements in Countries of the Southern African Development Community. Journal of African Economies, 17 (01), 85-130. doi: 10.1093/jae/ejm006
- Keohane, R.O. & Nye, J.S. (2001). Power and Interdependence. New York, London: Longman.
- Keohane, R.O. (1984). After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Mair, S. & Peters-Berries, C. (2001). Regionale Integration und Kooperation in Afrika südlich der Sahara. EAC, ECOWAS und SADC im Vergleich. Bonn, München: Weltforum Verlag.
- Mattli, W. (1999). The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Moravcsik, A. (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Muntschick, J. (2012). Theorising Regionalism and External Influence: A Situation-structural Approach. Mainz Papers on International and European Politics, 02, 1-29.
- Muntschick, J. (2013). Regionalismus und Externer Einfluss: Stört die Europäische Union die Regionale Marktintegration im südlichen Afrika? Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 54 (04), 686-713.
- Muntschick, J. (2017). SADC. Extra-regional Trade Relations Contrain Deeper Market Integration. In: Krapohl, S. (Eds.). Regional Integration in the Global South. External Influence on Economic Cooperation in ASEAN, MERCOSUR and SADC. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 179-207. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-38895-3
- Muntschick, J. (2018). Regionalism and External Influence: The Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the ambivalent Impact of the EU on Regional Integration. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45330-9
- Nye, J.S. (1968). International Regionalism. Boston: Brown and Company
- Oye, K.A. (1985). Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies. World Politics, 38 (01), 1-24. doi: 10.2307/2010349
- Plank, F. (2017). The Effectiveness of Interregional Security Cooperation: Evaluating the Joint Engagement of the EU and the AU in Response to the 2013 Crisis in the Central African Republic. European Security, 26 (04), 485-506. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2017.1327849
- Qualmann, R. (2003). South Africa’s Reintegration Into World and Regional Markets. Trade Liberalisation and Emerging Patterns of Specialisation in the Post-Apartheid Era. Leipzig: Universität Leipzig
- Sebenius, J.K. (1983). Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties. International Organization, 37 (02), 281-316. doi: 10.1017/S002081830003438X
- Söderbaum, F. (2004). Modes of Regional Governance in Africa: Neoliberalism, Sovereignty Boosting, and Shadow Networks. Global Governance, 10 (04), 419-436. doi: 10.1163/19426720-01004004
- Stapel, S. & Söderbaum, F. (2019). Mapping and Problematizing External Funding to the AU and the RECs. In: Engel, U. & Mattheis, F. (Eds.). The Finances of Regional Organisations in the Global South. London: Routledge
- Tjønneland, E.N. (2006). SADC and Donors - Ideals and Practices. From Gaborone to Paris and Back. Gaborone: Botswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis.
- Underdal, A. (1992). The Concept of Regime “Effectiveness”. Cooperation and Conflict, 27 (03), 227-240. doi: 10.1177/0010836792027003001
- Valentine, N. (1998). The SADC’s Revealed Comparative Advantage in Regional and International Trade. Cape Town: Development Policy Research Unit.
- Weiland, H. (2006). The European Union and Southern Africa. Interregionalism between vision and reality. Interregionalism and International Relations. London, New York: Routledge.
- Young, O.R. (1969). Interdependencies in World Politics. International Journal, 24 (04), 726-750. doi: 10.1177/002070206902400407
- Young, O.R. (1992). The Effectiveness of International Institutions: Hard Cases and Critical Variables. In: Rosenau, J.N., Czempiel, E.-O. & Smith, S. (Eds.). Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. P. 160-194
- Yurtaev, V.I. (2016). BRICS: Challenges of Cooperation on the African Continent. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 16 (02), 191-202
- Zürn, M. (1987). Gerechte internationale Regime. Bedingungen und Restriktionen der Entstehung nicht-hegemonialer internationaler Regime untersucht am Beispiel der Weltkommunikationsordnung. Frankurt am Main: Haag Herchen
- Zürn, M. (1993). Problematic Social Situations and International Institutions: On the Use of Game Theory in International Politics. In: Pfetsch, F.R. (Eds.). International Relations and Pan-Europe: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Findings. Münster: Lit-Verlag. P. 63-84