Regionalism in Global Era: Overview of Foreign and Russian Approaches

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article is devoted to a review of the formation of the theoretical foundations of the modern generation of regionalism. In the article, the authors tried to provide an overview of the publications of foreign and Russian researchers on modern theories of regionalism, examined the evolution of theoretical approaches to the study of regionalism, and also tried to identify the main trends and niches in the development of regional studies abroad and in Russia. The current practice of regional development requires the development of new theoretical and methodological approaches to their study. There is a wide variety of different integration forms in modern world. There is an overlapping membership of a large number of states in various regional structures, and a supplement of formal interstate interactions at the regional level with expanding stable informal and “private” ties. Besides the formation of regional cooperation in various fields take place, and, finally, the intensification of direct relations between interstate unions of different regions and the creation of transcontinental blocks of cooperation. All of the above is a complex “multi-level structure” that is gradually developed in the evolution process of regionalism. The purpose of this article is to determine the theoretical foundations of the modern generation of regionalism, its problem field and the difficulties in its study. As a result, the authors came to the conclusion that modern regionalism is a multidimensional, eclectic approach to the study of various forms of regional ties, taking into account not only regional but also global contexts, the formation of the theoretical and conceptual foundations of which has not yet been completed.

About the authors

Maria Lvovna Lagutina

Saint Petersburg State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: m.lagutina@spbu.ru

PhD, Dr. of Sc. (Political Science), Associate Professor, School of International Relations

Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

Ekaterina Borisovna Mikhaylenko

Ural Federal University

Email: earslanova@urfu.ru

PhD in History, Associate Professor, Department of International Relations

Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2003). Democratization and the Prospects for Participatory Regionalism in Southeast Asia. Third World Quarterly, 24 (2), 375—390.
  2. Acharya, A. (2006). Europe and Asia: Reflections on a Tale of Two Regionalisms. In: Fort, B. & Webber, D. (Eds.). Regional Integration in Europe and East Asia: Convergence or Divergence? London and New York: Routledge. P. 312—321.
  3. Acharya, A. (2008). Regional Worlds in a Post-Hegemonic Era: Keynote Speech. 3rd GARNET Annual Conference, Bordeaux. 17—20 September. URL: http://amitavacharyaacademic.blogspot.com/2008/10/regional-worlds-in-post-hegemonic-era.html (accessed: 07.10. 2019).
  4. Acharya, A. (2012). Comparative Regionalism: A Field Whose Time has Come? The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, 47 (1), 3—15.
  5. Acharya, A. (2014). The End of the American World Order. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
  6. Adler, E. & Greve, P. (2009). When Security Community Meets Balance of Power: Overlapping Regional Mechanisms of Security Governance. Review of International Studies, 35 (S1), 59—84. doi: 10.1017/S0260210509008432
  7. Aniche, E. (2018). Pan-Africanism and Regionalism in Africa: The Journey so Far. SSRN. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3098045 (accessed: 07.10. 2019).
  8. Baykov, A.A. (2012). Comparative Integration. Practice and Models of Integration in Foreign Europe and Pacific Asia. Moscow: Aspekt Press publ. (In Russian).
  9. Beeson, M. & Lee-Brown, T. (2016). The Future of Asian Regionalism: Not What It Used to Be. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 4 (2), 195—206. doi: 10.1002/app5.168
  10. Beeson, M. & Stubbs, R. (Eds.). (2011). Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203803608
  11. Biermannamd, R. & Koops, J.A. (Eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations in World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-36039-7
  12. Börzel, T.A. & Risse, T. (Eds.). (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford University Press.
  13. Börzel, T.A. & Van Hüllen, V. (Eds.). (2015). Governance Transfer by Regional Organizations. Patching Together a Global Script. Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Coe, B.N. (2019). Sovereignty in the South Intrusive Regionalism in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108654821
  15. Cusack, A.K. (2019). Venezuela, ALBA, and the Limits of Postneoliberal Regionalism in Latin America and the Caribbean. Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/978-1-349-95003-4
  16. De Lombaerde, P. & Schultz, M. (2009). The EU and World Regionalism. The Makability of Regions in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.
  17. De Lombaerde, P. (2010). How to ‘Connect’ Micro-regions with Macro-regions? A Note. Perspectives on Federalism, 2 (3), 1—9. URL: http://www.on-federalism.eu/attachments/080_download.pdf (accessed: 26.02.2020).
  18. De Lombaerde, P., Söderbaum, F., Van Langenhove, L. & Baert, F. (2010). The Problem of Comparison in Comparative Regionalism. Review of International Studies, 36 (3), 731—753. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000707
  19. Fawcett, L. (2004). Exploring Regional Domains: A Comparative History of Regionalism. International Affairs, 80 (3), 429—446. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00391.x
  20. Fawcett, L. (2005). Regionalism in Historical Perspective. In: Farrell, M., Hettne, B. & Van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). The Global Politics of Regionalism. Theory and Practice. London: Pluto Press. P. 21—38.
  21. Fawcett, L. (2016). Regionalism by Emulation: Considerations across Time and Space. In: Telo, M., Fawcett, L. & Ponjaert, F. (Eds.). Interregionalism and the European Union. Post-revisionist Approach to Europe’s Place in a Changing World. Abington: Routledge. P. 33—55.
  22. Haas, E. (1964). Beyond the Nation-state: Functionalism and International Organization. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  23. Haas, E. (1975). The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
  24. Hanggi, H., Roloff, R. & Ruland, J. (2006). Interregionalism: A New Phenomena in International Relations. In: Hanggi, H., Roloff, R. & Ruland, J. (Eds.). Interregionalism and International Relations. London: Roultedge.
  25. Hettne, B. & Söderbaum, F. (2000). Theorising the Rise of Regionness. New Political Economy, 5 (3), 457—472. doi: 10.1080/713687778
  26. Hettne, B. (2005). Beyond the “New Regionalism”. New Political Economy, 10 (4), 543—571. doi: 10.1080/13563460500344484
  27. Katzenstein, P.J. (1996). Regionalism in Comparative Perspective. Cooperation and Conflict, 31 (92), 123—159.
  28. Katzenstein, P.J. (2000). Regionalism and Asia. New Political Economy, 5 (3), 353—368.
  29. Katzenstein, P.J. (2005). A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Cornell University Press.
  30. Keating, M. (2001). Rethinking the Region: Culture, Institutions and Economic Development in Catalonia and Galicia. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8 (3), 217—234. doi: 10.1177/096977640100800304
  31. Keohane, R.O. & Nye, J.S. (1997). Interdependence in World Politics. In: Crane, G.T. & Amawi, A. (Eds.). The Theoretical Evolution of International Political Economy: A Reader. New York: Oxford University Press.
  32. Krapohl, S. & Van Huut, S. (2019). A Missed Opportunity for Regionalism: the Disparate Behavior of African Countries in the EPA-negotiations with the EU. Journal of European Integration, 1—19. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2019.1666117
  33. Kubicek, P. (2009). The Commonwealth of Independent States: An Example of Failed Regionalism? Review of International Studies, 35 (S1), 237—256.
  34. Kuznetsov, D.A. (2016). Transregionalism: Problems of Terminology and Conceptualization. Comparative Politics, 7 (2), 14—25. doi: 10.18611/2221-3279-2016-7-2(23)-14-25. (In Russian).
  35. Kuznetsov, D.A. (2018). Trans-regionalism as a New Phenomenon of International Relations and Its Interpretation in the Global Integrated Regional Studies. In: Voskressenski, A.D. (Eds.). (2018). World Regional Studies in Pedagogical Practice. In 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow: MGIMO Universitet publ. P. 47—58. (In Russian).
  36. Lagutina, M. (2019a). A World of Global Regions? Is Regionalization 20 Possible? In: Voskressenski, A.D. & Koller, B. (Eds.). The Regional World Order: Transregionalism, Regional Integration, and Regional Projects across Europe and Asia. Rowman & Littlefield. P. 49—61.
  37. Lagutina, M. (2019b). The Global Region: A Concept for Understanding Regional Processes in Global Era. Journal of Cross-Regional Dialogues, 1, 13—38.
  38. Lagutina, M. (2020). A Concept of Eurasia: from Classical Eurasianism to Pragmatic Eurasianism. In: Lagutina, M. (Eds.). Regional Integration and Future Cooperation Initiatives in the Eurasian Economic Union. IGI Global. P. 1—15.
  39. Lagutina, M. (2019c). BRICS in a World of Regions. Third World Thematic: A TWQ Journal, 4 (6), 442—458. doi: 10.1080/23802014.2019.1643781
  40. Lagutina, M.L. (2015). Global Region as a Unit of World Political System of the XXI century. Comparative Politics, 6 (2), 16—21. doi: 10.18611/2221-3279-2015-6-2(19)-16-21. (In Russian).
  41. Lagutina, M.L. (2016). The World of Regions in the Structure of the World Political System of the 21st Century. Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy gosudarstvenniy politekhnicheskiy universitet publ. (In Russian).
  42. Laruelle, M. (2015). Eurasia, Eurasianism, Eurasian Union: Terminological Gaps and Overlaps. PONARS Eurasia. URL: http://www.ponarseurasia.org/memo/eurasia-eurasianism-eurasian-union-terminological-gaps-and-overlaps (accessed: 01.04.2019).
  43. Laursen, F. (2003). Comparative Regional Integration: Theoretical Perspectives. Ashgate.
  44. Lebedeva, M.M. & Kuznetsov, D.A. (2019). Transregional Integration as a New Phenomenon of World Politics: Nature and Prospects. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 71—84. doi: 10.17976/jpps/2019.05.06. (In Russian).
  45. Libman, A. & Obydenkova, A. (2017). Why Is the ‘Post-Soviet’ Regionalism Post-Soviet? Historical Legacies and Regional Integration in Eurasia. MPRA Paper, 83506. URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83506/ (accessed: 01.04.2019).
  46. Loewen, H. & Zorob, A. (2018). Initiatives of Regional Integration in Asia in Comparative Perspective Concepts, Contents and Prospects. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-024-1211-6
  47. Makarychev, A.S. (1999). Western Frontiers of Russia: Problems of Security and Transnational Regionalism. Moscow: Moskovskiy tsentr Karnegi publ., 8, 1—19. (In Russian).
  48. Martynova, E.S. (2012). Integration Processes in the Asia-Pacific Region: New Outlines of East Asian Regionalism. International Organisations Research Journal, 7 (4), 254—270 (in Russian).
  49. Mearsheimer, J. (1994). The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, 19 (3), 5— 49.
  50. Mikhaylenko, E. & Mikhaylenko, V. (2020). Eurasian Regionalism: Specifics, Problems and Prospects. In: Lagutina, M. (Eds.). Regional Integration and Future Cooperation Initiatives in the Eurasian Economic Union. IGI Global. P. 16—36.
  51. Mikhaylenko, E. & Mikhaylenko, V. (2016). New Forms of Integration or Alternative Regionalism. In: Taranu, A. (Eds.). Governing for the Future: Interdisciplinary Perspectives for a Sustainable World. MEDIMOND S R L. P. 67—74.
  52. Mikhaylenko, E.B. & Adami, I.M. (2019). Coping with Changing World Order: the Case of Russia. In: Feron, E. (Eds.). Revisiting Regionalism and the Contemporary World Order. Berlin: Verlag Stahleisen GmbH. P. 157—177.
  53. Mikhaylenko, E.B. (2014). “Old” and “New” Regionalism: Theoretical Discourse. Yekaterinburg: Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta publ. (In Russian).
  54. Mitrany, D. (1965). The Prospect of European Integration: Federal or Functional. Journal of Common Market Studies, 4 (2), 119—149. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.1965.tb01124.x
  55. Molchanov, M.A. (2015). Eurasian Regionalism: Ideas and Practices. In: Kanet, R.E. & Sussex, M. (Eds.). Power, Politics and Confrontation in Eurasia. London: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 135—157.
  56. Muradyan, A.A. (1995). Regionalism as a Problem of Political Science. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science, 3, 83—89.
  57. Obydenkova, V. & Libman, A. (2019). Authoritarian Regionalism in the World of International Organizations: Global Perspective and the Eurasian Enigma. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198839040.001.0001
  58. Panke, D. & Stapel, S. (2018). Exploring Overlapping Regionalism. Journal of International Relations and Development, 21 (3), 635—662. doi: 10.1057/s41268-016-0081-x
  59. Pestsov, K.S. (2016). Comparative Regionalism: Typology of Patterns of Regional Cooperation and Integration. Russia and the Pacific, 2, 5—16. (In Russian).
  60. Pestsov, S.K (2005). Regionalism and System of International Relations. Vestnik of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2 (120), 65—71. (In Russian).
  61. Pestsov, S.K. (2017). Regionalism and New Peripheral Policy of China. World Politics, 3, 103—118. doi: 10.25136/2409-8671.2017.3.23751. (In Russian).
  62. Pestsov, S.K. (2018). Regionalism in Interpretation of China: the Evolution of Theoretical Views and Practical Policies. Proceedings of the Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology FEB RAS, 18, 36—64. (In Russian).
  63. Rüland, J. (2018). Coping with Crisis: Southeast Asian Regionalism and the Ideational Constraints of Reform. Asia Europe Journal, 16, 155—168. doi: 10.1007/s10308-018-0503-z
  64. Schulz, M., Söderbaum, F. & Öjendal, J. (2001). Regionalization in a Globalizing World: A Comparative Perspective on Forms, Actors, and Processes. New York: Zed Books Limited.
  65. Selleslaghs, J., Ruiz, J.B. & De Lombaerde, P. (2020). Regionalism in Latin America: Eclectic, Multi-faceted and Multi-layered. In: Hosli, M. & Selleslaghs, J. (Eds.). The Changing Global Order. Springer. P. 223—245. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-21603-0_12
  66. Sergunin, A. & Gao, F. (2018). BRICS as the Subject of Study of International Relations Theory. International Organisations Research Journal, 13 (4), 55—73. doi: 10.17323/19967845-2018-04-03
  67. Sergunin, A.A. (1994). Problems and Opportunities of Regional Studies. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 149—152. (In Russian).
  68. Söderbaum, F. & Taylor, I. (Eds.). (2007). Micro-Regionalism in West Africa Evidence from Two Case Studies. Discussion Paper 34. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrika institutet. P. 1—36.
  69. Söderbaum, F. & Van Langenhove, L. (2006). The EU as a Global Player. The Politics of Interregionalism. London: Routledge.
  70. Söderbaum, F. (2005). Exloping the Links between Micro-regionalism and Macro-Regionalism. In: Farrell, M., Hettne, B. & Van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). Global Politics of Regionalism: Theory and Practice. London: Pluto Press. P. 87—103.
  71. Söderbaum, F. (2007). Regionalisation and Civil Society. The Case of Southern Africa. New Political Economy, 12 (3), 319—337.
  72. Söderbaum, F. (2009). Comparative Regional Integration and Regionalism. In: Landman, T. & Robinson, N. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics. London: SAGE. P. 477—496.
  73. Söderbaum, F. (2015). Early, Old, New and Comparative Regionalism: The Scholarly Development of the Field. KFG Working Paper Series, October, 64. Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) “The Transformative Power of Europe”, Freie Universität Berlin.
  74. Söderbaum, F. (2016). Rethinking Regionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  75. Taylor, I. (2005). NEPAD. Toward Africa’s Development or Another False Start? Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
  76. Telo, M. (2007). European Union and New Regionalism: Regional Actors and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era. Cornwall: Ashgate Publishing.
  77. Van Langenhove, L. & Costea, A.-N. (2005). The EU as a Global Actor and the Emergence of ‘Third Generation’ Regionalism. UNU—CRIS Occasional Papers, 0-2005/14. United Nations University.
  78. Vivares, E. & Dolcetti-Marcolini, M. (2016). Two Regionalisms, Two Latin Americas or beyond Latin America? Contributions from a Critical and Decolonial IPE. Third World Quarterly, 37 (5), 866—882. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1109438
  79. Voskressenski, A.D. (2012). Concepts of Regionalization, Regional Subsystems, Regional Complexes and Regional Transformations in Contemporary IR. Comparative Politics Russia, 3 (2), 30—58. doi: 10.18611/2221-3279-2012-3-2(8)-30-58. (In Russian).
  80. Voskressenski, A.D. & Koller, B. (Eds.). (2019). The Regional World Order: Transregionalism, Regional Integration, and Regional Projects across Europe and Asia. Langham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield / Lexington Books.
  81. Voskressenski, A.D. (2017). Non-Western International Relations Theories: Conceptualizing World Regional Studies. Springer Global: Palgrave Macmillan.
  82. Voskressenski, A.D. (2019). Regionalism as a Paradigm of World Order. In: Gaman-Golutvina, О.V. & Nikitin, A.I. (Eds.). Modern Political Science. Methodology. 2nd ed. Moscow: Aspekt Press publ. P. 675—695.(In Russian).
  83. Voskressenski, A.D. (Eds.). (2014). World Regional Studies. Moscow: Magistr: INFRA-M publ. (In Russian).
  84. Yurtaev, V.I. & Rogov, A.S. (2017). BRICS and SCO: Particular Qualities of Formation and Activities. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 17 (3), 469—482. doi: 10.22363/2313-0660-2017-17-3-469-482. (In Russian).

Copyright (c) 2020 Lagutina M.L., Mikhaylenko E.B.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies