Nigeria - South Africa Rivalry in Quest for Regional Power Status: from Material Potential to UN Security Council Membership

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The paper explores the role and the power potential of Nigeria and South Africa with special attention to their comparatively high military, economic, political capabilities that enable them to shape and dominate regional agenda. It also analyses the internal, regional and external dynamics within Africa, particularly in Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and Southern African Development Community (SADC). The paper further thoroughly examines the hegemonic contest for the UN Security Council membership among the dominant African states through the lens of Ezulwini Consensus, as well as the Pan-African credentials of Nigeria and South Africa in accordance to their contribution to ensuring peace, stability and development on continental and sub-regional levels. Nigeria and South Africa are the most important actors on the African continent, but there are obvious constraints undermining their ability to play an effective regional role. Thus, the research was guided by the comparison case-study of Nigeria and South Africa in crucial for understanding power potential areas. The study concludes that although Pan-Africanism stands of Nigeria and South Africa are commendable, both powers mostly follow this strategy for advancing their national interests. Taking into account the whole set of internal and external factors, both countries need to unite their efforts and practical strategies to advance the common goal of Africa development, peace and security.

About the authors

Ikponmwonsa Omoruyi

University of Benin

Email: ikponmwonsa.omoruyi@uniben.edu
Professor, Department of International Law, Faculty of Law Benin City, Nigeria

Stephen Osaherumwen Idahosa

RUDN University

Email: idahosa8@gmail.com
Postgraduate Student, Department of Theory and History of International Relations Moscow, Russian Federation

Mahamat Mugadam Mugadam

RUDN University

Email: mmougadammahamat@gmail.com
Postgraduate Student, Department of Political Analysis and Management Moscow, Russian Federation

Oumar Sidibe

RUDN University

Email: omersidibe@gmail.com
Postgraduate Student, Department of Theory and History of International Relations Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Abegunrin, O. (2009). Africa in Global Politics in the Twenty-First Century. A Pan-African Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  2. Adebajo, A. (2008). Hegemony on A Shoestring: Nigeria’s Post-Cold War Foreign Policy. In: Adebajo, A. & Mustapha, A.R. (Eds.). Gulliver’s Troubles: Nigeria’s Foreign Policy after the Cold War. Kwazulu-Natal: University of Kwazulu-Natal
  3. Akpotor, A.S. & Agbebaku, P.E. (2010). The United Nations Reforms and Nigeria’s Quest for a Permanent Seat. Journal of Social Science, 24 (01), 51-55. doi: 10.1080/09718923.2010.11892836
  4. Alden, C. & Le Pere, G. (2009). South Africa in Africa: Bound to Lead? Politikon, 36 (01), 145-169. doi: 10.1080/02589340903155443
  5. Alden, C. & Schoeman, M. (2015). South Africa’s Symbolic Hegemony in Africa. International Politics, 52 (02), 239-254. doi: 10.1057/ip.2014.47
  6. Amos, S. (2010). The Role of South Africa in SADC Regional Integration: The Making or Breaking the Organization. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 5 (06), 124-130.
  7. Bellamy, A.J. & Williams, P.D. (Eds). (2013). Providing Peacekeepers. The Politics, Challenges, and Future of United Nations Peacekeeping Contributions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Börzel, T. & Risse, T. (Eds.). (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Buzan, B. & Waever, O. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511491252
  10. Degterev, D.A. (2020). Evaluation of Current Balance of Power at the International Arena and Formation of a Multipolar World. Moscow: RuScience publ. (In Russian).
  11. Kayaoglu, T. (2015). The Organization of Islamic Cooperation: Politics, Problems, and Potential. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315751467
  12. Maseng, J.O. (2013). Integrating Africa and the Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Process of UNSC Reform. Conflict Trends, 4, 19-25.
  13. Maseng, J.O. & Lekaba, F.G. (2014). United Nations Security Council Reform and the Dilemmas of African Continental Integration. African Security Review, 23 (04), 395-404. doi: 10.1080/10246029.2014.948896
  14. Miti, K. (2012). South Africa and Conflict Resolution in Africa: From Mandela to Zuma. Southern African Peace and Security Studies, 1 (01), 26-42.
  15. Neumann, I. (Eds.). (1992). Regional Great Powers in International Politics. New York: St. Martin’s.
  16. Nolte, D. (2010). How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics. Review of International Studies, 36, 881-901. doi: 10.1017/S026021051000135X
  17. Odubajo, T. & Akinboye, S. (2017). Nigeria and South Africa: Collaboration or competition? South African Journal of International Affairs, 24 (01), 61-77. doi: 10.1080/10220461.2017.1314224
  18. Ogunnubi, O. & Tella, O. (2017). Framing South Africa’s Soft Power through Non-State Sources. Strategic Analysis, 41 (05), 478-495. doi: 10.1080/09700161.2017.1343228
  19. Omo-Ogbebor, O.D. & Sanusi, H.A. (2017). Asymmetry of Ecowas Integration Process: Contribution of Regional Hegemon and Small Country. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 17 (01), 59-73. doi: 10.22363/2313-0660-2017-17-1-59-73
  20. Prys, M. (2010). Hegemony, Domination, Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood. International Studies Review, 12 (04), 479-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00957.x
  21. Raimi, A.L. (2016). The Reform and Democratization of the Security Council of the United Nations: The Viability of Nigeria’s Quest for a Permanent Seat in the Council. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6 (11), 313-321
  22. Söderbaum, F. & Shaw T. (Eds). (2003). Theories of New Regionalism: A Palgrave Reader. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  23. Tella, O. (2018). Space as a Fulcrum of Nigeria’s External Relations and Regional Hegemony. Space Policy, 46 (01), 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2018.05.001
  24. Tella, O. (2019). Nigeria - South Africa Relations and Regional Hegemonic Competence. Berlin: Springer Nature. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-00081-3

Copyright (c) 2020 Omoruyi I., Idahosa S.O., Mugadam M.M., Sidibe O.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies