Vestnik RUDN. International RelationsVestnik RUDN. International Relations2313-06602313-0679федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Российский университет дружбы народов имени Патриса Лумумбы» (РУДН)2332810.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-1-147-157Research ArticleNigeria - South Africa Rivalry in Quest for Regional Power Status: from Material Potential to UN Security Council MembershipOmoruyiIkponmwonsaProfessor, Department of International Law, Faculty of Lawikponmwonsa.omoruyi@uniben.eduIdahosaStephen OsaherumwenPostgraduate Student, Department of Theory and History of International Relationsidahosa8@gmail.comMugadamMahamat MugadamPostgraduate Student, Department of Political Analysis and Managementmmougadammahamat@gmail.comSidibeOumarPostgraduate Student, Department of Theory and History of International Relationsomersidibe@gmail.comUniversity of BeninRUDN University1512202020114715730032020Copyright © 2020, Omoruyi I., Idahosa S.O., Mugadam M.M., Sidibe O.2020The paper explores the role and the power potential of Nigeria and South Africa with special attention to their comparatively high military, economic, political capabilities that enable them to shape and dominate regional agenda. It also analyses the internal, regional and external dynamics within Africa, particularly in Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and Southern African Development Community (SADC). The paper further thoroughly examines the hegemonic contest for the UN Security Council membership among the dominant African states through the lens of Ezulwini Consensus, as well as the Pan-African credentials of Nigeria and South Africa in accordance to their contribution to ensuring peace, stability and development on continental and sub-regional levels. Nigeria and South Africa are the most important actors on the African continent, but there are obvious constraints undermining their ability to play an effective regional role. Thus, the research was guided by the comparison case-study of Nigeria and South Africa in crucial for understanding power potential areas. The study concludes that although Pan-Africanism stands of Nigeria and South Africa are commendable, both powers mostly follow this strategy for advancing their national interests. Taking into account the whole set of internal and external factors, both countries need to unite their efforts and practical strategies to advance the common goal of Africa development, peace and security.Africaregional powerhegemonNigeriaSouth AfricaCINCUN Security CouncilEzulwini ConsensusECOWASSADCAfrican Union (AU)CINCАфрикарегиональная державагегемонНигерияЮжная АфрикаСовет Безопасности ООН«Консенсус Эзулвини»ЭКОВАССАДКАфриканский союз (АС)[Abegunrin, O. (2009). Africa in Global Politics in the Twenty-First Century. A Pan-African Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan][Adebajo, A. (2008). Hegemony on A Shoestring: Nigeria’s Post-Cold War Foreign Policy. In: Adebajo, A. & Mustapha, A.R. (Eds.). Gulliver’s Troubles: Nigeria’s Foreign Policy after the Cold War. Kwazulu-Natal: University of Kwazulu-Natal][Akpotor, A.S. & Agbebaku, P.E. (2010). The United Nations Reforms and Nigeria’s Quest for a Permanent Seat. Journal of Social Science, 24 (01), 51-55. DOI: 10.1080/09718923.2010.11892836][Alden, C. & Le Pere, G. (2009). South Africa in Africa: Bound to Lead? Politikon, 36 (01), 145-169. DOI: 10.1080/02589340903155443][Alden, C. & Schoeman, M. (2015). South Africa’s Symbolic Hegemony in Africa. International Politics, 52 (02), 239-254. DOI: 10.1057/ip.2014.47][Amos, S. (2010). The Role of South Africa in SADC Regional Integration: The Making or Breaking the Organization. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 5 (06), 124-130.][Bellamy, A.J. & Williams, P.D. (Eds). (2013). Providing Peacekeepers. The Politics, Challenges, and Future of United Nations Peacekeeping Contributions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.][Börzel, T. & Risse, T. (Eds.). (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.][Buzan, B. & Waever, O. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511491252][Degterev, D.A. (2020). Evaluation of Current Balance of Power at the International Arena and Formation of a Multipolar World. Moscow: RuScience publ. (In Russian).][Kayaoglu, T. (2015). The Organization of Islamic Cooperation: Politics, Problems, and Potential. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315751467][Maseng, J.O. (2013). Integrating Africa and the Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Process of UNSC Reform. Conflict Trends, 4, 19-25.][Maseng, J.O. & Lekaba, F.G. (2014). United Nations Security Council Reform and the Dilemmas of African Continental Integration. African Security Review, 23 (04), 395-404. DOI: 10.1080/10246029.2014.948896][Miti, K. (2012). South Africa and Conflict Resolution in Africa: From Mandela to Zuma. Southern African Peace and Security Studies, 1 (01), 26-42.][Neumann, I. (Eds.). (1992). Regional Great Powers in International Politics. New York: St. Martin’s.][Nolte, D. (2010). How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics. Review of International Studies, 36, 881-901. DOI: 10.1017/S026021051000135X][Odubajo, T. & Akinboye, S. (2017). Nigeria and South Africa: Collaboration or competition? South African Journal of International Affairs, 24 (01), 61-77. DOI: 10.1080/10220461.2017.1314224][Ogunnubi, O. & Tella, O. (2017). Framing South Africa’s Soft Power through Non-State Sources. Strategic Analysis, 41 (05), 478-495. DOI: 10.1080/09700161.2017.1343228][Omo-Ogbebor, O.D. & Sanusi, H.A. (2017). Asymmetry of Ecowas Integration Process: Contribution of Regional Hegemon and Small Country. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 17 (01), 59-73. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2017-17-1-59-73][Prys, M. (2010). Hegemony, Domination, Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood. International Studies Review, 12 (04), 479-504. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00957.x][Raimi, A.L. (2016). The Reform and Democratization of the Security Council of the United Nations: The Viability of Nigeria’s Quest for a Permanent Seat in the Council. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6 (11), 313-321][Söderbaum, F. & Shaw T. (Eds). (2003). Theories of New Regionalism: A Palgrave Reader. New York: Palgrave Macmillan][Tella, O. (2018). Space as a Fulcrum of Nigeria’s External Relations and Regional Hegemony. Space Policy, 46 (01), 1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2018.05.001][Tella, O. (2019). Nigeria - South Africa Relations and Regional Hegemonic Competence. Berlin: Springer Nature. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00081-3]