POST-SOVIET CENTRAL ASIA AND AFGHANISTAN AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE MAJOR ASIAN STATES’ INTERESTS
- Authors: Malysheva D.B.1
-
Affiliations:
- Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relation
- Issue: Vol 18, No 2 (2018): Central Asia: “geopolitical pluralism” and the quest for regional identity
- Pages: 259-272
- Section: THEMATIC DOSSIER
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/18878
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2018-18-2-259-272
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is analyzing the current situation in Afghanistan; it reveals the challenges and risks that emanate from this conflict zone and affect the security sphere of the five post-Soviet states of Central Asia (CA) and their Asian neighbors. Attention is paid to the growth of drug trafficking and the terrorist threat from Afghanistan by the “Islamic state” (IS, a terrorist group banned in Russia). The diplomatic initiatives taken by Russia, China, and other states to achieve national reconciliation in Afghanistan are considered. Military-political and economic projects in Central Asia (“One Belt, One Way”, and “China-Pakistan Economic Corridor”), which are alternatives to the Russia-initiated integration in the sphere of economy (Eurasian Economic Union - EAEU) and security (the Collective Security Treaty Organization - CSTO) are analyzed taking into account the rivalry within the China-India-Pakistan triangle. In connection with the recent changes in the Asian strategy of the United States, the peculiarities of India-Pakistan interaction with the post-Soviet states of Central Asia and with Afghanistan have been revealed. The chronological framework of the article is а period following the partial withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2014 of the American military contingent, brought to the beginning of 2018, when a new geopolitical reality began to form in the Central Asian region.
About the authors
Dina Borisovna Malysheva
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relation
Author for correspondence.
Email: dsheva@mail.ru
Doctor of Political Sciences, Head of Section, Centre for Post-Soviet Studies, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relation, Russian Academy of Sciences
References
- Afghanistan in 2017. A Survey of the Afghan People. (2017). The Asia Foundation. URL: https://asiafoundation.org/publication/afghanistan-2017-survey-afghan-people/ (accessed: 04.01.2018).
- Afghanistan Opium Survey 2016. Cultivation and Production. Executive Summary. (2016). United Nations Office on Drug and Crime. URL: http://www.unodc.org/documents/press/releases/ AfghanistanOpiumSurvey2016.pdf (accessed: 17.11.2017).
- Azami, D. (2016). The Islamic State in South and Central Asia. Survival, 58 (4), 131—158. doi: 10.1080/00396338.2016.1207955.
- Barabanov, O., Bordachyov, T. & others. (2017). The Importance of Being Earnest: How to Avoid Irreparable Damage. Valdai Discussion Club Report. Moscow. (In Russ.).
- Belokrenitsky, V.Ya. & Sikoev, R.R. (2014). The Taliban and the Prospects of Afghanistan and Pakistan. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies. (In Russ.).
- Challenges to Security in Central Asia. (2013). Moscow: Institute of World Economy and International Relations. (In Russ.).
- Clarke, M. (2016). ‘One Belt, One Road’ and China’s emerging Afghanistan dilemma. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70 (5), 563—579. doi: 10.1080/10357718.2016.1183585.
- Fallon, Th. (2015). The New Silk Road: Xi Jingping's Grand Strategy for Eurasia. American Foreign Policy Interests, 37(3), 140—147.
- Dynkin, A. & Ivanova, N. (Eds.) (2015). Global “Perestroika”. Transformation of World Order. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishers.
- Humanitarian Response Plan. January 2018 — December 2021. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). (2017). URL: https://www.unocha.org/sites/ unocha/files/dms/afg_2018_humanitarian_response_plan_0.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2018).
- India and Central Asia. (2004). New Delhi.
- Is Regional Strategy Viable in Afghanistan? (2010). Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Luzyanin, S. (2016). Bound by One Belt. Outlines of Global Transformations, 6 (9), 41—59. (In Russ.).
- Malysheva, D. (2016). Post-Soviet Central Asia and its Asian Neighbours. Russia and New States of Eurasia, Moscow, 4, 19—30. (In Russ.).
- Malysheva, D. (2017). The Afghan Crisis and Post-Soviet Central Asia. World Economy and International Relations, 8, 14—23. (In Russ.).
- Morozov, Yu.V. (2016). The strategy of the West in the Central Asian region at the beginning of the XXI century. Moscow: Institute of the Far East. (In Russ.).
- Umarov, A.A. (2017). Afghanistan and the Regional Security of Central Asia: the Beginning of the XXI century. Tashkent. (In Russ.).
- Rashid, A. (2010). Taliban, Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia. Second edition. Yale University Press.
- Rashid, A. (2012). The Future of America, Pakistan and Afghanistan. London: Penguin Books.
- Regional Security Outlook 2018. (2018). The Council for Security Cooperation in the Asia Pacific. URL: http://www.cscap.org/uploads/docs/CRSO/CSCAP2018WEB.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2018).