RUSSIAN AND CHINESE SYSTEMS OF DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
- Authors: Degterev DA1, Yan L.2, Trusova AA1
-
Affiliations:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
- Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
- Issue: Vol 17, No 4 (2017): Terrorism as a threat to international security
- Pages: 824-838
- Section: INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/17539
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2017-17-4-824-838
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The subject of this study are the mechanisms of development cooperation both in the Rus-sian Federation and China. The authors carry out a comparative analysis of the regulatory bases of the two states in the sphere of development cooperation, organizational structures, conceptual apparatus, specifics of Russian and Chinese foreign aid. The methodological basis of this research is based on the principles of reliability and scientific objectivity. In the study methods of comparative-comparative analysis are applied. Strategic partnership between the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China, including conjugation of the project of the Economic belt of the Silk Road and the Eurasian Economic Union, creates prerequisites for successful interaction of the two states in the field of international assistance to third countries. In the legislation of the PRC, there is a conceptual basis for official development assistance, it includes “White Books” and other political documents that establish the principles, goals and objectives, the mecha-nism for the implementation of China's external assistance. In the Russian Federation, there is a Concept of State Policy in the Sphere of International Development Assistance, which reflects the goals, objectives, principles for the implementation of development cooperation, but does not approve at the legislative level the mechanism for providing assistance. In both countries there is also no specialized government agency that would implement policies to promote development cooperation. It is rather a matter of a number of state bodies in the sphere of development cooperation, whose activities are to some extent coordinated on an interagency basis. The analysis of doctrinal and normative documents, as well as existing programs of development cooperation of the Russian Federation and the PRC, regional and sectoral priorities, makes it possible to develop recommendations on coordinating the efforts of the Russian Federation and the PRC in the field of promoting development cooperation, which will ultimately lead to an increase in the effectiveness of national programs of foreign aid.
About the authors
D A Degterev
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: Degterev_DA@rudn.university
Degterev Denis Andreevich - PhD in World Economy, Head of Department of Theory and History of International Relations, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia
Li Yan
Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Email: liyan9339@163.com
Li Yan - Doctor in History, Researcher of Institute of World Economic and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Bejing, PRC
A A Trusova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Email: 1032152385@rudn.university
Trusova Alexandra Andreevna - student of Department of Theory and History of International Relations, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia
References
- Balakova, E., & Spanger, H.-J. (2013). Development Cooperation or Competition? Russia as a reemerging donor. PRIF-Report No. 123. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF).
- Berthélemy, J.C. (2011). China’s Engagement and Aid Effectiveness in Africa. African Development Bank Working Paper #129. Tunis, Tunisia: African Development Bank, 2011.
- Degterev, D.A. (2013). International development assistance: Evolution of international legal regimes and effectiveness of foreign aid. Moscow, LENAND. 320 p. (in Russ.).
- Degterev, D.A. (2014). Russian policy in the sphere of assistance to international development: outlines of partnership with BRICS countries // Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 14 (01), 5—12. (in Russ.).
- Dreher, A., Fuchs, A., Parks, B., Strange, A. & Tierney, M. (2015). Apples and Dragon Fruits: The Determinants of Aid and Other Forms of State Financing from China to Africa. AidData, Working Paper 15.
- Ermolov, M.O. (2015). The Russian Framework for International Assistance: An Unfinished Plan. International Organisations Research Journal (IORJ), 10 (3), 134—155. (in Russ.).
- Fedorovsky, A.N. & Voda K.R. (2016). Development assistance in foreign strategies of China, the Republic of Korea and Japan. World Economy and International Relations, 60 (12), 82—91. (in Russ.).
- Foreign Aid (2013). Ed. by L.M. Kapitsa. Moscow: MGIMO-University. 652 p. (in Russ.).
- Gu Guan‐Fu (1983). Soviet aid to the third world, an analysis of its strategy. Soviet Studies. 35 (1), 71—89.
- Larionova, M., Rakhmangulov, M. & Berenson, M. (2014) The Russian Federation’s International Development Assistance Programme: A State of the Debate Report. IDS, Evidence Report No 88. Rising Powers in International Development.
- Mardashev, A.A. (2011). Chinese model of international development assistance. Vestnik of MGIMO- University. 6, 96—106. (in Russ.).
- Mikhnevich, S.V. (2014). Trade Facilitation and PRC's Approaches to International Development Assistance. Russia and China: Problems of Strategic Cooperation: A Compilation of the Eastern Center. 15, 46—55. (in Russ.).
- National strategies of international development assistance (2010). Moscow: Higher School of Economics. (in Russ.).
- Potapenko, M.V. (2014). PRC as a New International Donor: Peculiarities of the Policy of Promoting International Development. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 14 (01), 19—31. (in Russ.).
- Rahmangulov, M.R. (2010). Establishing Russia’s International Development Assistance Policy. International Organisations Research Journal (IORJ), 5 (2), 196—215. (in Russ.).