A Comprehensive Approach to Post-Conflict Reconstruction: German Experience in Afghanistan

Cover Page

Cite item


As a part of a larger research project on complex linkages between security and development implemented by the Center for Security and Development Studies at the Lomonosov Moscow State University, this paper examines the complex dilemmas of pursuing comprehensive approach to post-conflict reconstruction with an example of Federal Republic of Germany’s experience with the Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) in Afghanistan after the terrorist attacks of 9/11. The first section depicts the background of deployment of the PRTs on Afghan territory. The second section compares the U.S., British and German models of PRTs and assesses the role of those teams as vehicles of close civil-military, interagency coordination. The third and the fourth sections identify respectively characteristic features of the German PRTs’ activities in Kunduz and Badakhshan provinces and the main obstacles that hindered the achievement of key objectives. The conclusion contains a concise assessment of effectiveness and efficiency of PRTs as a mechanism of addressing complex challenges of post-conflict reconstruction and transition to peaceful development. It also postulates that the PRT model, regardless of some objective difficulties faced by various German agencies, may be very relevant in the future in fulfilling a revised agenda of the German foreign and defense policies in the XXI century.

About the authors

Philip Olegovich Trunov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: 1trunov@mail.ru
Moscow, Russia


  1. Afghanistan – securing the future. Regional development funds support Afghanistan’s reconstruction and stability. (2014). Berlin: GIZ, KfW.
  2. Alieva, A.I. (2016). Afganskaya strategiya Turtsii: sodeistvie bezopasnosti i razvitiyu [Turkish strategy towards Afghanistan: to promote security and development]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 2, pp. 80 — 90.
  3. Assistance for rebuilding the police force in Afghanistan. (2005). Berlin, Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Federal Ministry of the Interior.
  4. Bartenev, V.I. (2015). Svjazka «bezopasnost' — razvitie» v sovremennyh zapadnyh issledovanijah: ot dekonstrukcii k kontekstualizacii [“Security — Development Nexus” in western bibliography from deconstruction to contextualization]. Mezhdunarodnye processy [International processes], 3, pp. 78— 97.
  5. Bartenev, V.I. (2015). "Plan Marshalla" dlya Afganistana: paradoksy realizatsii ["Marshall Plan" for Afghanistan: Paradoxes of implementation]. SshA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul'tura [USA and Canada: economics, politics and culture], 7, pp. 54—73.
  6. Davidson, Ph.B. (2002). Vojina vo Vjietname. 1946—1975 [The War in Vietnam. 1946—1975]. Moscow: Eksmo.
  7. Five years of German PRTs in Afghanistan: an interim stocktaking from the angle of the German aid organisations. (2009). Berlin: VENRO (Association of German development NGOs).
  8. Gall, C. (2014). The Wrong enemy: America in Afghanistan, 2001-2014. USA: Kindle Edition.
  9. Germany’s support for police reform in Afghanistan. (2012). Berlin, Federal Foreign Office, Federal Ministry of the Interior.
  10. Hett, J. (2005). Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan. Das amerikanische, britische und deutsche Modell. Berlin: Zentrum für Internationale Friedenseinsätze.
  11. Hochwart, M.A. (2009). The provincial reconstruction teams in Afghanistan – a model for future nation- building operations. Kansas: United States Army Command and General Staff College Fort Leavenworth, School of Advanced Military Studies.
  12. Korgun, V.G. (2011). SShA v Afganistane: missiya nevypolnima? [The United States in Afghanistan: Mission Impossible?] Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika, 3, pp. 106—134.
  13. Mikhailin, K.N. (2009). FRG i NATO v Afganistane (2001—2008 gg.) [Germany and NATO in Afghanistan]. Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A.I. Gertsena, 101, pp. 21—27.
  14. Malysheva, D.B. (2013). Bezopasnoe razvitie Tsentral'noi Azii i afganskii faktor [The secure development of Central Asia and the Afghan factor]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika, 2, pp. 105—125.
  15. New Country strategy for Afghanistan. (2014). Berlin: BMZ.
  16. Noetzel, T., Rid, Th. (2009). Germany’s Options in Afghanistan. Survival, 51, pp. 71—90.
  17. Novikova, O.N. (2014). «Zhestkaya» i «myagkaya» sila Zapada v sovremennom Afganistane [Western ,,hard power,, and ,,soft power,, in Afghanistan]. Aktual'nye problemy Evropy, 3, pp. 38— 58.
  18. Paul, M. (2009). CIMIC in the ISAF Mission. Berlin: SWP.
  19. Petrik, J. (2016). Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan: Securitising Aid through Developmentalizing the Military. The Securitization of Foreign Aid. Ed. by Stephen Brown and Jörn Grävingholt. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 163—187.
  20. Popova, O.P., Trunov, Ph.O. (2016). Mezhvedomstvennoye vzaimodeystvye v ramkach okazanya pomoschi nestabilnim gosydarstvam: opit FRG [Interagency Cooperation in Providing
  21. Assistance to Fragile States: The Case of Germany]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika, 1, pp. 107—139.
  22. Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan (by Markus Gauster). (2008). Occasional Paper Series, 16.
  23. Sushchentsov, A.A. (2014). Malye voiny SShA: politicheskaya strategiya SShA v konfliktakh v Afganistane i Irake v 2000-2010-kh godakh [Small Wars of the United States: the US political strategy in the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq in 2000-2010-ies]. Moscow: Aspekt Press.
  24. The Bundeswehr on Operations: Publication to Mark the 15th Anniversary of the First Parliamentary Mandate for Armed Bundeswehr Missions Abroad. (2009). Berlin, Federal Ministry of Defense.
  25. Von Bredow, W. (2015). Sicherheit, Sicherheitspolitik und Militär. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
  26. Werner, L. The PRT Kunduz: An Unsuccessful Command Structure (2014). URL: https://globalecco.org/the-prt-kunduz-an-unsuccessful-command-structure (accessed 27.08.2016).
  27. Yudin, N.V. (2016). Svyazka «bezopasnost' – razvitie»: problemy teoreticheskogo osmysleniya [Security–Development Nexus: Dilemmas of Conceptualization]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta.Seriya 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika, 1, pp. 39—71.

Copyright (c) 2016 Трунов Ф.О.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies