Position of the American Think Tanks on Iran's Nuclear Program
- Authors: Ivkina N.V.1, Poyda A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
- Issue: Vol 15, No 3 (2015): International Political Science. Conflict Studies. Greater Middle East
- Pages: 118-125
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/10716
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article examines the role of “analytical centers” in the US foreign policy agenda. From a variety of “think tanks” highlights those who have made the greatest impact on the foreign policy - the Heritage Foundation and the Center for American progress. They examine U.S. relations with other regions of the world. The marked correlation between the reports of these think tanks and the positions of the Democratic and Republican parties of the USA. Based on the publications of articles and reports from these centers, it is considered one of the directions of U.S. foreign policy. In the article there is the comparative analysis of the approaches of these centers to the problem of Iran's nuclear program. This question is particularly acute on the agenda in relations between Iran and the United States. In addition, in 2015, the negotiations between Iran and the Six mediators on the nuclear issue has entered a crucial stage, it makes this issue the most relevant. The author makes a conclusion about the extent of American influence of “think-tanks” on foreign policy decisions in general and on specific political situation.
About the authors
Natalia Viktorovna Ivkina
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Email: ifknatali@rambler.ru
Department of Theory and History of International Relations
Alexei Alexandrovich Poyda
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Email: alexeypoyda@yandex.ru
Department of Theory and History of International Relations