Electronic bill of lading: ideals and realities

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Digitalization is regarded as one of the most prominent trends of development of global economy as well as international economic relations. Yet, the authors stress that when broken to transport and logistics digital processes tend to be uneven, fragmented, and generally too declarative. The research finds out that conservative way of thinking of the majority of market participants also hampers such transformation, which is mostly evident in global trade in hydrocarbons. In its turn, juridical unsettledness both globally and nationally of electronic turnover of transport documents at large and electronic Bill of Lading (B/L) in particular both globally and nationally also undermines the upcoming perspectives. Thus, it has been revealed that it is too early to speak about a well-­structured system of electronic document turnover (incl. B/L segment) in logistics of international trade. As of today, it has been justified that almost 95 % of international seaborne trade is covered by B/Ls. At the same time there is no commonly accepted definition of B/L or electronic B/L. So far nothing has been juridically settled with negotiability function of e-B/L. However, there is a couple of electronic platforms that facilitate the turnover of e-B/Ls. Generally they are of limited membership and geographical coverage (for instance, EU). Besides, banks’ joining the process is quite disputable despite the fact there is already the electronic version (eUCP) of ICC Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP 600). In this essence, Bolero, yet with some clauses, turns out to be the most leading platforms servicing e-B/Ls. To sum it up, the study outlines that given the lack of solid system of electronic turnover of transport documents both in organizational and juridical terms a good example of existing practices could be derived from the telex-­release technology used in liner shipping of containers and containing some traits of e-B/L ascendancies. The authors conclude that it is worth positioning the current state of affairs as paperless B/L turnover or quasi-­electronic rather than fully electronic one.

About the authors

Andrei M. Golubchik

MGIMO University

Email: pigeon_am@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-0582-3935
SPIN-code: 9130-4789

Candidate of Science (In Economics), Associate Professor at the Department of International Transport and Logistics

76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation

Egor V. Pak

MGIMO University

Author for correspondence.
Email: e.pak@inno.mgimo.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5664-0435
SPIN-code: 1074-2081

Candidate of Science (In Economics), Head of the Department of International Transport and Logistics, Associate Professor of the Department of International Economic Relations and Foreign Economic Affairs named after N.N. Liventsev

76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation

References

  1. Golubchik, A.M. (2021). Electronic transport documents: Ideals and realities. Daily Logistics, (4), 258–264. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36627/2500-1302-2021-4-4-258-264 EDN: MELINP
  2. Golubchik, A.M. (2022). Electronic transport document-­turnover as of today (Russian and foreign practices). Proceedings of international conference “Current problems of international transport policy”, Moscow, 13–19. (In Russ.). EDN: XPGXKE
  3. Golubchik, A.M., & Katykha, P.B. (2021). Some aspects of the possibility of application of electronic bills of lading int petrotrader’s practice. Russian Foreign Economic Journal, (4), 97–106. (In Russ.). EDN: YMFRID
  4. Kholopov, K.V., & Dancheeva, N.V. (2015). Unveiling bills of lading in foreign trade. Moscow: RuScience. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15216/978-5-4365-0286-1 EDN: UDGVIB
  5. Kholopov, K.V., & Golubchik, A.M. (2021). Documents in international transactions. Moscow: Pervyi Tom publ. (In Russ.).
  6. Krebs, T. (2024). Electronic bills of lading, transnational and English law: Blocking the blockchain. Uniform Law Review, 28(3–4), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unad022
  7. Litvin, T.A., Ostapchuk, E.S., & Polyakova, K.O. (2025). Legal problems of introducing an electronic bill of lading in international maritime transportation. Herald of Ushakov State Maritime University, (1), 48–52. (In Russ.). EDN: ECGHOU
  8. Markalova, N.G. (2024). Impact of the Rotterdam rules on the legislation on electronic bill of lading. Moscow Journal of International Law, (2), 79–91. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2024-2-79-91 EDN: DGYUCP
  9. Spartak, A.N., & Kravchenko, Yu.B. (2017). Key global trends of the current decade. Russian Foreign Economic Journal, (12), 7–26. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2072-8042-2021-12-7-26 EDN: ZPWSYO
  10. Strelets, I.A., & Chebanov, S.V. (2020). Digitalization of world trade: Scope, forms, implications. World Economy and International Relations, 64(1), 15–25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-1-15-25 EDN: DGMWHA
  11. Todd, P. (2019). Electronic bills of lading, blockchains and smart contracts. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 27(4), 339–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaa002

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 Golubchik A.M., Pak E.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.