Contemporary trends of globalization and deglobalization
- Authors: Tileva I.1
-
Affiliations:
- University of National and World Economy
- Issue: Vol 33, No 4 (2025): BRICS+: THE CHANGING ROLE IN A MULTIPOLAR WORLD
- Pages: 834-854
- Section: GLOBALIZATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/economics/article/view/48486
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363//2313-2329-2025-33-4-834-854
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MVPFVH
- ID: 48486
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Globalization is a phenomenon that in the modern world has an increasingly contradictory connotation. If in the middle of the last century most countries in the world were striving for greater openness of their economies, over the last decade there are trends of deglobalization, in order to preserve sovereignty or to protect national economic and political interests. The process of economic globalization is being strengthened through the role of international economic organizations, the conclusion of regional trade agreements, participation in economic blocs and the entry of influential big brands into new markets. The study aims to summarize the prerequisites for strengthening economic globalization, why deglobalization processes occur and what are the consequences for the world economy. The study will focus on economic globalization and will cover some more distinctive contemporary examples of economic deglobalization and their effects. Тhe analysis shows that protectionism in major economies could lead to partial market deglobalization mostly in the protected sectors and it is a prerequisite for economic shocks that lead to a deterioration in the basic indicators of the countries. Economic disintegration may lead to trade shifts and temporarily affect the country’s economy, but it does not deglobalize the national market. The challenges of the study is the simultaneous analysis of globalization and deglobalization, which adds significant complexity to the research. Moreover, the study explores many current economic issues, some of which are still evolving, such as the complex trade relations between the United States and China since the beginning of 2025.
About the authors
Ivet Tileva
University of National and World Economy
Author for correspondence.
Email: itileva@unwe.bg
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7726-1258
Phd, Chief Assistant, International Economic Relations department
19 8-mi dekemvri st., Sofia, 1700, BulgariaReferences
- Autor, D.H., Dorn, D., Hanson, G.H., Pisano, G., & Shu, P. (2020). Foreign competition and domestic innovation: Evidence from U.S. patents. American Economic Review: Insights, 2(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20180481
- Baldwin, R. (2016). The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv24w655w
- Baldwin, R. (2019). The Globotics upheaval: Globalization, robotics, and the future of work. Oxford University Press.
- Baldwin, R., & Evenett, S.J. (eds.). (2020). COVID-19 and trade policy: Why turning inward won’t work: VoxEU.org eBook. Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR). https://voxeu.org/content/covid-19-and-trade-policy-why-turning-inward-won-t-work
- Börzel, T.A., & Risse, T. (2018). From the Euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310281
- Bordo, M. (2017). The second era of globalization is not yet over: An historical perspective. NBER Working Paper No. 23786. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23786
- Danov, D. (2006). International Trade in Services and Intellectual Products. Publishing House of the University of National and World Economy. (In Bulgarian).
- Estevadeordal, A., Freund, C., & Ornelas, E. (2008). Does regionalism affect trade liberalization towards non-members? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1531–1575. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1531
- Faubert, V. (2012). Learning from the first globalisation (1870–1914). Economie & Prévision, 200–201(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.3917/ecop.200.0217
- Frankel, J.A., & Romer, D. (1999). Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review, 89(3), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.379 EDN: GRLEZ
- Friedman, T.L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century (Updated and expanded ed.). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Gereffi, G., & Fernandez-Stark, K. (2016). Global value chain analysis: A primer (2nd ed.). Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness (CGGC), Duke University. https://gvcc.duke.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/GVC_analysis_2nd_edition.pdf
- Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001
- Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Stanford University Press.
- Hettne, B., Inotai, A., & Sunkel, O. (1999). Globalism and the new regionalism. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27268-6
- Hettne, B., & Söderbaum, F. (2000). Theorising the rise of regionness. New Political Economy, 5(3), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/713687778 EDN: DSBYBF
- Kren, J., & Lawless, M. (2024). How has Brexit changed EU–UK trade flows? European Economic Review, 161, 104634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104634 EDN: NMYSSW
- Liu, C. (2024). The Silk Road: A modern analogy of globalization and cultural exchange. Communications in Humanities Research, 28, 140–144. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/28/20230242 EDN: SPWJAG
- Lydgate, E., Szyszczak, E., Winters, L.A., & Anthony, C. (2021). Taking stock of the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement: Trade in goods. Briefing Paper 52. https://www.uktpo.org/publications/taking-stock-of-the-uk-eu-trade-and-cooperation-agreement-trade-in-goods/
- Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy. W.W. Norton & Company.
- Sapkota, J. (2011). Impacts of globalization on quality of life: Evidence from developing countries. Global Institute for Asian Regional Integration, Vol. Workin, No. 2011-E-1, 1–28.
- Stiglitz, J.E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. W.W. Norton & Company.
- Witt, M.A. (2019). De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7), 1053–1077. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00219-7 EDN: PGNYEO
- Yücesan, E. (2025). Does deglobalization imply the end of global supply chains? International Business Review, 34(6), 102398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102398 EDN: MBETKI
- Zahoor, N., Wu, J., Khan, H., & Khan, Z. (2023). Deglobalization, international trade protectionism, and the reconfigurations of global value chains. Management International Review, 63(5), 823–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-023-00522-4 EDN: NUCOGW
- Zhelev, P. (2015). Theory of International Economic Relations. Publishing House of the University of National and World Economy. (In Bulgarian).
- Zhelev, P. (2018). Contemporary regionalism in the world economy and protectionism. Is the time for a new protectionism coming? Publishing House of VUZF “St. Gregory the Theologian”. (In Bulgarian).
Supplementary files










