<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Economics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Economics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Экономика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2329</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8986</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">48486</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2329-2025-33-4-834-854</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">MVPFVH</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>GLOBALIZATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ГЛОБАЛИЗАЦИЯ И ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Contemporary trends of globalization and deglobalization</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Современные тенденции глобализации и деглобализации</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7726-1258</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tileva</surname><given-names>Ivet</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Тилева</surname><given-names>Ивет</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Phd, Chief Assistant, International Economic Relations department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат наук, старший преподаватель кафедры международных экономических отношений</p></bio><email>itileva@unwe.bg</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">University of National and World Economy</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Университет национального и мирового хозяйства</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-02-22" publication-format="electronic"><day>22</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">BRICS+: THE CHANGING ROLE IN A MULTIPOLAR WORLD</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">БРИКС+: МЕНЯЮЩАЯСЯ РОЛЬ В УСЛОВИЯХ МНОГОПОЛЯРНОГО МИРА</issue-title><fpage>834</fpage><lpage>854</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-02-22"><day>22</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-02-22"><day>22</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2026, Tileva I.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2026, Тилева И.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Tileva I.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Тилева И.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/economics/article/view/48486">https://journals.rudn.ru/economics/article/view/48486</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Globalization is a phenomenon that in the modern world has an increasingly contradictory connotation. If in the middle of the last century most countries in the world were striving for greater openness of their economies, over the last decade there are trends of deglobalization, in order to preserve sovereignty or to protect national economic and political interests. The process of economic globalization is being strengthened through the role of international economic organizations, the conclusion of regional trade agreements, participation in economic blocs and the entry of influential big brands into new markets. The study aims to summarize the prerequisites for strengthening economic globalization, why deglobalization processes occur and what are the consequences for the world economy. The study will focus on economic globalization and will cover some more distinctive contemporary examples of economic deglobalization and their effects. Тhe analysis shows that protectionism in major economies could lead to partial market deglobalization mostly in the protected sectors and it is a prerequisite for economic shocks that lead to a deterioration in the basic indicators of the countries. Economic disintegration may lead to trade shifts and temporarily affect the country’s economy, but it does not deglobalize the national market. The challenges of the study is the simultaneous analysis of globalization and deglobalization, which adds significant complexity to the research. Moreover, the study explores many current economic issues, some of which are still evolving, such as the complex trade relations between the United States and China since the beginning of 2025.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Глобализация — это феномен, который в современном мире приобретает все более противоречивую коннотацию. Если в середине XX в. большинство стран стремились к открытости своих экономик, то в предпоследнее десетилетие наблюдаются тенденции деглобализации, направленные на сохранение суверенитета или защиту национальных экономических и политических интересов. При этом процесс экономической глобализации усиливается за счет роли международных экономических организаций, заключения региональных торговых соглашений, участия в экономических блоках и выхода влиятельных крупных брендов на новые рынки. Цель исследования — обобщить предпосылки усиления экономической глобализации, причины возникновения процессов деглобализации и их последствия для мировой экономики. Рассмотрена экономическая глобализация, а также приведены отличительные актуальные примеры экономической деглобализации и их влияние. Анализ показал, что протекционизм в крупных экономиках может привести к частичной деглобализации рынков, преимущественно в защищаемых секторах, и является предпосылкой экономических потрясений, вызывающих ухудшение основных показателей стран. Экономическая дезинтеграция может привести к перераспределению торговли и временно повлиять на экономику страны, однако она не приводит к деглобализации национального рынка. Одновременный анализ процессов глобализации и деглобализации существенно усложняет, но и обогащает, повышает значимость исследования.</p></trans-abstract><funding-group><award-group><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="ru">Данное исследование было поддержано исследовательской программой Университета национальной и мировой экономики (UNWE) в рамках гранта № NID NI-19/2024A «Глобализация и деглобализация: тенденции, экономические последствия и политика».</institution></institution-wrap><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="en">This research was supported by the Research Programme of the University of National and World Economy (UNWE) under Grant No. NID NI-19/2024A, “Globalization and Deglobalization: Trends, Economic Effects, and Policies”.</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source></award-group></funding-group></article-meta><fn-group/></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Autor, D.H., Dorn, D., Hanson, G.H., Pisano, G., &amp; Shu, P. (2020). Foreign competition and domestic innovation: Evidence from U.S. patents. American Economic Review: Insights, 2(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20180481</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Baldwin, R. (2016). The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv24w655w</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Baldwin, R. (2019). The Globotics upheaval: Globalization, robotics, and the future of work. Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Baldwin, R., &amp; Evenett, S.J. (eds.). (2020). COVID-19 and trade policy: Why turning inward won’t work: VoxEU.org eBook. Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR). https://voxeu.org/content/covid-19-and-­trade-policy-­why-turning-­inward-won-t-­work</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Börzel, T.A., &amp; Risse, T. (2018). From the Euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310281</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Bordo, M. (2017). The second era of globalization is not yet over: An historical perspective. NBER Working Paper No. 23786. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23786</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Danov, D. (2006). International Trade in Services and Intellectual Products. Publishing House of the University of National and World Economy. (In Bulgarian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Estevadeordal, A., Freund, C., &amp; Ornelas, E. (2008). Does regionalism affect trade liberalization towards non-­members? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1531–1575. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1531</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Faubert, V. (2012). Learning from the first globalisation (1870–1914). Economie &amp; Prévision, 200–201(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.3917/ecop.200.0217</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Frankel, J.A., &amp; Romer, D. (1999). Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review, 89(3), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.379 EDN: GRLEZ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Friedman, T.L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-­first century (Updated and expanded ed.). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Gereffi, G., &amp; Fernandez-­Stark, K. (2016). Global value chain analysis: A primer (2nd ed.). Center on Globalization, Governance &amp; Competitiveness (CGGC), Duke University. https://gvcc.duke.edu/wp-­content/uploads/2016/10/GVC_analysis_2nd_edition.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., &amp; Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Stanford University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Hettne, B., Inotai, A., &amp; Sunkel, O. (1999). Globalism and the new regionalism. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27268-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Hettne, B., &amp; Söderbaum, F. (2000). Theorising the rise of regionness. New Political Economy, 5(3), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/713687778 EDN: DSBYBF</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Kren, J., &amp; Lawless, M. (2024). How has Brexit changed EU–UK trade flows? European Economic Review, 161, 104634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104634 EDN: NMYSSW</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Liu, C. (2024). The Silk Road: A modern analogy of globalization and cultural exchange. Communications in Humanities Research, 28, 140–144. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/28/20230242 EDN: SPWJAG</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Lydgate, E., Szyszczak, E., Winters, L.A., &amp; Anthony, C. (2021). Taking stock of the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement: Trade in goods. Briefing Paper 52. https://www.uktpo.org/publications/taking-­stock-of-­the-uk-­eu-trade-­and-cooperation-­agreement-trade-­in-goods/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy. W.W. Norton &amp; Company.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Sapkota, J. (2011). Impacts of globalization on quality of life: Evidence from developing countries. Global Institute for Asian Regional Integration, Vol. Workin, No. 2011-E-1, 1–28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Stiglitz, J.E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. W.W. Norton &amp; Company.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Witt, M.A. (2019). De-­globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7), 1053–1077. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00219-7 EDN: PGNYEO</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Yücesan, E. (2025). Does deglobalization imply the end of global supply chains? International Business Review, 34(6), 102398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102398 EDN: MBETKI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Zahoor, N., Wu, J., Khan, H., &amp; Khan, Z. (2023). Deglobalization, international trade protectionism, and the reconfigurations of global value chains. Management International Review, 63(5), 823–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-023-00522-4 EDN: NUCOGW</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Zhelev, P. (2015). Theory of International Economic Relations. Publishing House of the University of National and World Economy. (In Bulgarian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Zhelev, P. (2018). Contemporary regionalism in the world economy and protectionism. Is the time for a new protectionism coming? Publishing House of VUZF “St. Gregory the Theologian”. (In Bulgarian).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
