Methodological provisions for the formation of an industrial enterprise management system based on the use of its potential

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

From the perspective of enterprise development, all problems can be divided into two types: routine or technical, and development or improvement. At the same time, routine problems and procedures obscure development goals and problems. In addition, studies show that about 80-85% of problems are routine problems that could take 20% of managerial time, while 95% of manager’s time is taken and give only 20% of the organization’s efficiency. Therefore, it is necessary to classify problems, build a solution algorithm, implement and transform this algorithm until it becomes absolutely correct (the percentage of errors in such processes is 1-2) and effective. It should be borne in mind that the problem may be existing or real and far-fetched.

About the authors

Yuri Yu. Kostyukhin

National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”

Author for correspondence.
Email: kostuhinyury@mail.ru

Ph.D., Associate Professor

4 Leninskii Ave., Moscow 109049, Russian Federation

Yuri N. Moseykin

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: moseykin-yun@rudn.ru

Doctor of Economics, Professor

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

References

  1. Alekseev, S.B., & Kolesnikova, E.A. (2018). Formirovanie i ispol'zovanija finansovogo potenciala v sisteme upravlenija predprijatiem [Formation and use of financial potential in the enterprise management system]. Enterprise strategy in the context of increasing its competitiveness, 7(7), 105–108.
  2. Collins, D., & Hansen, M. (2016). Velikie po sobstvennomu vyboru [Greats of their own choice]. Moscow.
  3. Dzakoev, Z.L. (2015). Jekonomicheskij potencial predprijatija: soderzhanie i upravlenie [The economic potential of the enterprise: content and management]. Bulletin of the Vladikavkaz Scientific Center, 15(1), 58–64.
  4. Efremova, A.A., & Serova, A.V. (2015). Ocenka jeffektivnosti dejatel'nosti predprijatija i ee vlijanie na potencial predprijatija [Assessment of the effectiveness of the enterprise and its impact on the potential of the enterprise]. Actual problems and prospects of economic development: Collected articles (pp. 147–150).
  5. Gavrilyuk, S.I. (2017). Analiz upravlenija konkurentnym potencialom v kommercheskom predprijatii [Analysis of competitive potential management in a commercial enterprise]. Cooperation, Economics, Law: vector of interaction: Mater. of scientific conf. of faculty and students (pp. 4–9).
  6. Glekov, P.M., & Kryzhanovskaya, O.A. (2016). Analiz tendencij razvitija chernoj metallurgii i ih vlijanie na promyshlennyj potencial [Analysis of trends in the development of ferrous metallurgy and their impact on industrial potentiall]. Izv. Southwestern State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management, 2(19), 89–101.
  7. Gordashnikova, O.Yu., & Orlova, T.V. (2015) Rezul'taty klasternogo analiza faktorov, vlijajushhih na jeffektivnost' mehanizma upravlenija innovacionnym potencialom predprijatija [The results of a cluster analysis of factors affecting the effectiveness of the mechanism for managing the innovative potential of an enterprise]. Actual problems of economics and management, 2(6), 18–23.
  8. Karmokova, K.I. (2016). Konkurentnyj potencial – faktor ustojchivogo razvitija sovremennyh promyshlennyh predprijatij [Competitive potential is a factor in the sustainable development of modern industrial enterprises]. Scientific Review, (13), 207–211.
  9. Korovin, A.V. (2015). Analiz jekonomicheskogo potenciala predprijatija [Analysis of the economic potential of the enterprise]. Economics and Management in Mechanical Engineerring, (1), 16–20.
  10. Kostyukhin, Yu., Sidorova, E.Yu., Chernovolenko, S.E., & Shtansky, V.A. (2018). Konceptual'naja model' mehanizma formirovanija potenciala nauchnyh znanij, ispol'zuemyh dlja proizvodstva naukoemkoj produkcii i mehanizm ego ocenki [The conceptual model of the mechanism for the formation of the potential of scientific knowledge used for the production of high-tech products and the mechanism for its evaluation]. Economics in industry, 11(4), 359–367.
  11. Kostyukhin, Yu.Yu. (2019). Metodologicheskie polozhenija postroenija modelej razvitija promyshlennogo predprijatija [Methodological provisions of building models of industrial enterprise development]. Economics in industry, 12(1), 69–78.
  12. Kostyukhin, Yu.Yu. (2019). Metodologicheskie polozhenija postroenija modelej potenciala promyshlennogo predprijatija [Methodological provisions for building models of industrial enterprise potential]. Actual problems of economics and management, 1(21), 45–53.
  13. Logacheva, A.V., Zambrzhitskaya, E.S., & Ivanova, N.E. (2017). Analiz riskov predprijatij metallurgicheskoj otrasli kak jelement ocenki ih proizvodstvennogo potenciala [Risk analysis of metallurgical industry enterprises as an element of assessing their production potential]. Economics and Entrepreneurship, 9–3(86–3), 1057–1064.
  14. Popov, E.V., & Sukharev, O.S. (2018). Cifrovaja jekonomika: “irracional'nyj optimism” upravlenija i finansirovanija [Digital economy: “irrational optimism” of management and financing]. Economics. Taxes. Right, (2), 10.
  15. Vasilenko, A.V., & Alekseenko, Yu.A. (2016). Formirovanie kommunikativnogo potenciala v sisteme upravlenija predprijatiem [The formation of communicative potential in the enterprise management system]. Theory and practice of modern science, 6–1(12), 190–192.
  16. Zhelobodko, S.A. (2015). Rol' analiza proizvodstvennogo potenciala v upravlenii predprijatiem [The role of production potential analysis in enterprise management]. Science. Technology. Innovation: Сollection of proceedings: In 9 parts (part 7, pp. 162–164).

Copyright (c) 2020 Kostyukhin Y.Y., Moseykin Y.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies