The Contemporary Approaches to Interpretation of the Sustainable Development Concept

Cover Page

Cite item


In this article, the author analyzes the current approaches to interpretation of such a modern scientific phenomenon as the sustainable development concept. Actually, the inception of new attitudes to it derives from the fact that there is no generally accepted meaning of the term. The author emphasizes that the concept interpretation depends much on the changing global context, so every scientific approach tackles the tasks of the particular historic period. The paper elaborates and deepens the current research, clarifies the definitions and conceptual framework of sustainable development, determines its topical interpretations that correspond to the global agenda. In conclusion, the article suggests that the triune concept of sustainable development tends to be the most progressive one as it, to a certain extent, systemizes and embraces other approaches. In this regard, the author underlines the necessity of taking action at a global scope in order to achieve implementation of the goals and principles of the sustainable development concept.

About the authors

E A Starikova

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the MFA of Russia

Author for correspondence.

assistant lecturer, Economic Policy and PPP Department, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO-University)

Prospeсt Vernadskogo, 76, Moscow, Russia, 119454


  1. Akimova T.A. Ekonomika ustoichivogo razvitiya: ucheb. posobie // T.A. Akimova, Yu.N. Moseikin. M.: Izd-vo «Ekonomika», 2009. 430 s. (In Russ).
  2. Begun T.V. Ustoichivoe razvitie: opredelenie, kontseptsiya i faktory v kontekste monogorodov // Ekonomika, upravlenie, finansy: materialy II mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii (g. Perm’, dekabr’ 2012 g.). Perm’: Merkurii, 2012. S. 158—163. URL: (In Russ).
  3. Belousov K.Yu. Ustoichivoe razvitie kompanii i korporativnaya ustoichivost’: problemy interpretatsii // Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki. 2012. № 4. S. 122. URL: (In Russ).
  4. Belousov K.Yu. Korporativnaya sotsial’naya otvetstvennost’ kak faktor ustoichivogo razvitiya kompanii: diss. … kand. ekonom. nauk: 08.00.01 i 08.00.05. SPbGU, 2015. S. 25 (In Russ).
  5. Granberg A.G., Danilov-Danil›yan V.I. Strategiya i problemy ustoichivogo razvitiya Rossii v XXI veke. M.: Izd-vo «Ekonomika», 2002. 414 s. (In Russ).
  6. Danilov-Danil’yan V.I. Ekologicheskii vyzov i ustoichivoe razvitie / V.I. Danilov-Danil’yan, K.S. Losev. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000. 416 s. S. 416 (In Russ).
  7. Dreving S.R. Klasternaya kontseptsiya ustoichivogo razvitiya ekonomiki / S.-Peterb. gos. un-t. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU, 2009. 161 s. (In Russ).
  8. Loguntsev E.N. Kontseptsiya ustoichivogo razvitiya s pozitsii mezhdistsiplinarnogo podkhoda // Gorodskoe upravlenie. 2000. № 11. S. 24—32 (In Russ).
  9. Myachin Yu.V. Ustoichivoe razvitie: teoriya i praktika / Yu.V. Myachin, V.P. Popkov // Vestnik INZHEKONA. Seriya «Ekonomika». 2005. Vyp. 4. S. 240 (In Russ).
  10. Nashe obshchee budushchee. Doklad Mezhdunarodnoi komissii po okruzhayushchei srede i razvitiyu (MKOSR) / per. s angl.; pod red. S.A. Evteeva i R.A. Pereleta. M.: Progress, 1989. 372 s. (In Russ).
  11. Porter M. Mezhdunarodnaya konkurentsiya: konkurentnye preimushchestva stran / M. Porter; per. s angl.; pod red. i s predisl. V.D. Shchetinina. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1993. 896 s. (In Russ).
  12. Ugol’nitskii G.A. Ierarkhicheskoe upravlenie ustoichivym razvitiem. M.: Izd-vo fiziko-matematicheskoi literatury, 2010. 336 s. (In Russ).
  13. Ursul A.D. Kontseptual’nye problemy ustoichivogo razvitiya // Byulleten’ RAN. Ispol’zovanie i okhrana prirodnykh resursov v Rossii. 2005. № 1. S. 30—38. (In Russ).
  14. Khartiya «Goroda Evropy po puti k ustoichivomu razvitiyu». URL: (data obrashcheniya: 25.02.2012). (In Russ).
  15. Barbier E. The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development // Environmental Conservation. July 1987. Vol. 14. Issue 2. Pp. 101—110.
  16. Costanza R., d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber St. The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital // Nature. 1987. Vol. 387. Pp. 253—260.
  17. Costanza R., Daly H.E. Natural Capital and Sustainable Development // Conservation Biology. Mar., 1992. Vol. 6. No. 1. Pp. 37—46 [Electronic resource]. Mode of access
  18. Dyllick T., Hockerts K. Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability // Business Strategy and the Environment. 2002. № 11. Pp. 130—141. Mode of access
  19. Elkington J. The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up? Assessing the Sustainability of Business and CSR // Edited by Adrian Henriques and Julie Richardson. Earthscan Publications. London, 2004. Pp. 1—16.
  20. Elkington J. Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development // California Management Review 36(2). 1994. P. 90.
  21. Jeffrey D. Sachs. The Age of Sustainable Development / Columbia University Press. 2015. 544 p.
  22. Williams C.C., Millington A.C. The Diverse and Contested Meaning of Sustainable Development / The Geographical Journal. 2004. Vol. 170. № 2. Pp. 99—104.

Copyright (c) 2017 Starikova E.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies