Analytical review of modern studies of changes in the biotic components of the carbon cycle

Cover Page

Cite item


The research on changes in the spatial-temporal dynamics of carbon in natural ecosystems on land is explored. The works of Russian and foreign authors on the analysis of the depositing ability of the cover are presented. Works on biomass reserves and primary production of biogeocenoses, research in the field of mathematical modeling of the carbon cycle in terrestrial ecosystems using remote sensing data are described. The article discusses modern approaches to mathematical modeling of productive processes and biological cycles of elements in plant ecosystems. The contribution of Russian and foreign authors to the spatial-temporal dynamics of carbon is analyzed. The research data in the assessment of the sequestration capacity of plant ecosystems, as the role of an ecosystem function, performing the function of a climatic ensemble of the state of the atmosphere is given. The various modeling-based methods for assessing and forecasting carbon stocks in forests, which have received international recognition, are presented, and the role of climate in managed forests in mitigating changes and predicting their carbon storage potential for the period up to 2050 under different forest management scenarios is examined. Among them: ISIS IIASA (Austria), EFIMOD + ROMUL (Russia), ROBUL (Russia), Information System for Determination and Mapping of Carbon Deposition by Forests (Russia, UGFTU), CBM-CFS3 (Canadian Forest Service), FORCARB2 (US Forest Service). The works based on the spatial model of the carbon cycle in the “atmosphere - plant - soil” system (A.M. Tarko) of the Computing Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, used to assess the absorption potential in various regions of the world, are outlined.

About the authors

Anna I. Kurbatova

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Author for correspondence.

PhD in Environmental Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Monitoring and Forecasting, Faculty of Ecology

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation


  1. Kudeyarov VN. (ed.) Modeling the dynamics of organic matter in forest ecosystems. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 2007. (In Russ.)
  2. Usoltsev VA. Carbon sequestration by forests of the Ural region of Russia (on the base of Forest State Inventory data 2007). Yekaterinburg; 2018. (In Russ.)
  3. Usoltsev VA, Kolchin KV, Malenko AA. On the need to construct and analyze allometric models of forest tree phytomass as the basis for a correct assessment of the carbon-containing function of forests: analytical review. Bulletin of the Altai State Agrarian University. 2017;3(149):78–87. (In Russ.)
  4. Shvidenko AZ, Shchepashchenko DG. Carbon budget of Russian forests. Siberian Forest Journal. 2014;(1):69–92. (In Russ.)
  5. Zamolodchikov DG, Grabovsky VI, Korovin GN, Gitarsky ML, Blinov VG, Dmitriev VV, Kurts VA. Carbon budget of managed forests of the Russian Federation in 1990–2050: retrospective assessment and forecast. Meteorology and Hydrology. 2013;(10):73–92. (In Russ.)
  6. Malysheva NV, Moiseev BN, Filipchuk AN, Zolina TA. Methods for assessing the carbon balance in forest ecosystems and the possibility of their use for calculating annual carbon deposition. Forestry Bulletin. 2017;21(1):4–13. (In Russ.)
  7. Karelin DV, Zamolodchikov DG, Shilkin AV, Kumanyaev AS, Popov SYu, Telnova NO, Gitarsky ML. The influence of the progressive decay of the forest stand on the carbon exchange of spruce forests. Doklady Earth Sciences. 2020;493(1):89–93. (In Russ.)
  8. Vaganov VA, Vedrova EF, Verkhovets SV, Efremov SP, Efremova TT, Kruglov VB, Onuchin AA, Sukhinin AI, Shibistova OB. Forests and swamps of Siberia in the global carbon cycle. Siberian Ecological Journal. 2005;(4):631–649. (In Russ.)
  9. Karelin DV, Zamolodchikov DG, Shilkin AV, Kumanyaev AS, Popov SYu, Telnova NO, Gitarskiy ML. The long-term effect of ongoing spruce decay on carbon exchange in Taiga forests. Doklady Earth Sciences. 2020;493(1):558–561.
  10. Zamolodchikov DG. Carbon balance of Russian forests: a retrospective analysis and forecast estimates. Scientific Foundations of Sustainable Forest Management: Conference Reports. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.)
  11. Zamolodchikov DG. Systems for assessing and forecasting carbon stocks in forest ecosystems. Sustainable Forest Management. 2011;4(29):15–22. (In Russ.)
  12. Shimon TN. Assessment of the impact of biotic and anthropogenic factors of Russian forests on the carbon budget. Dissertation of the Candidate of Biological Sciences. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.)
  13. Kurbatova AI, Tarko AM, Kozlova EV. Impact of global climate change on ecosystem functions of African countries. Arid Ecosystems. 2017;7:217–223.
  14. Tarko A, Kurbatova A, Llerena S. Effect of CO2 increase on ecological parameters of plant ecosystems of Central and South America countries. E3S Web of Conferences. 2019;116:00090.
  15. Kurbatova AI, Tarko AM. Spatiotemporal dynamics of carbon in native and disturbed ecosystems of the world. Moscow: RUDN Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.)
  16. Ballav S, Naja M, Patra PK, et al. Assessment of spatio-temporal distribution of CO2 over greater Asia using the WRF–CO2 model. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2020;129:80.
  17. Yazaki T, Hirano T, Sano T. Biomass accumulation and net primary production during the early stage of secondary succession after a severe forest disturbance in Northern Japan. Forests. 2016;7(11):287.
  18. Liu LB, Yang HM, Xu Y, Guo YM, Ni J. Forest biomass and net primary productivity in Southwestern China: a meta-analysis focusing on environmental driving factors. Forests. 2016;7(8):173.
  19. Fedorov BG. Russian carbon balance. Moscow: Nauchnyi Konsul'tant Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.)
  20. Kurganova IN. Carbon dioxide emissions and balance in terrestrial ecosystems of Russia. Dissertation of the Doctor of Biological Sciences. Pushchino; 2010. (In Russ.)
  21. Malysheva NV, Moiseev BN, Filipchuk AN, Zolina TA. Methods for assessing the carbon balance in forest ecosystems and the possibility of their use for calculating annual carbon deposition. Forestry Bulletin. 2017;21(1):4–13. (In Russ.)
  22. Yershov DV, Lukina NV, Bartalev SA, Lupyan EA. The role of remote data in the system of biological diversity monitoring, assessment of ecosystem functions and forest services: plenary report. In: Scientific Bases of Forest Management. Moscow: CEPL RAS; 2014. (In Russ.)
  23. Shchepashchenko DG, Shvidenko AZ, Lesiv MYu, Ontikov PV, Shchepashchenko MV, Kraksner F. The forest area of Russia and its dynamics based on the synthesis of remote sensing products. Lesovedenie. 2015;(3):163–171. (In Russ.)
  24. Kolomyts EG, Kerzhentsev AS, Sharaya LS. Analytical and cartographic models of forest ecosystem sustainability. Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Functional Ecology: Proceedings of the Conference (27–29 October 2016, Pushchino). Pushchino; 2016. (In Russ.)
  25. Malysheva N, Zolina T, Dedova V. Estimation of carbon sequestration by Russian forests: geospatial issue. InterCarto. InterGIS. 2017;23:373–382. 10.24057/2414-9179-2017-1-23-373-382
  26. Saatchi SS, et al. Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(24):9899–9904. Available from: 24/9899 (accessed: 01.02.2021).
  27. Zheng J, Mao F, Du H, Li X, Zhou G, Dong L, Zhang M, Han N, Liu T, Xing L. Spatiotemporal simulation of net ecosystem productivity and its response to climate change in subtropical forests. Forests. 2019;10(8):708.
  28. Llerena S, Tarko A, Kurbatova A, Kozhevnikova P. Assessment of carbon dynamics in Ecuadorian forests through the Mathematical Spatial Model of Global Carbon Cycle and the Normalized Differential Vegetation Index (NDVI). E3S Web of Conferences. 2019;96:02002.

Copyright (c) 2020 Kurbatova A.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies