Combating Corruption in the Countries of Anglo-Saxon Tradition (Using Examples of Great Britain, India, Singapore and the USA)

Cover Page

Abstract


The article examines the experience of combating corruption in Great Britain, India, Singapore and the US. Despite all the differences, these countries have a common trait that was formed in the course of their historical development: they all share certain elements of the Anglo-Saxon tradition in the cultural, political and legal spheres. The purpose of the research is to examine the influence of these elements on anti-corruption policies. The analysis has revealed that the countries under review apply similar approaches, institutional mechanisms and ideologies to counter and eliminate corrupt behavior, which can be attributed to the shared factor of the Anglo-Saxon tradition. At the same time, the effectiveness of the measures used to eradicate corruption largely depends on economic conditions, behavioral attitudes, behavior patterns that are historically rooted in society, etc. In this context, the cultural component is of particular importance. The aforementioned countries’ analogous anti-corruption practices and tools can substantially vary under the influence of historically established national and cultural characteristics, significantly deviating from their original British roots. In addition, success in the fight against corruption directly depends on whether certain public institutions, whose cultural and behavioral nature dictates them to resist the introduction of new anti-corruption measures, remain present.


About the authors

Alexander P Strakhov

Open Society Center

Author for correspondence.
Email: alex50108@gmail.com
Moscow, Russian Federation

PhD in Political Science, Director of Open Society Center (Russian Federation), Doctoral Student of DBA Program, Instituto de Empresa (Spain)

References

  1. Astafieva E.M. Combating Corruption in Singapore: Strategy and Practice. Asia and Africa Today. 2016; 1 (702): 52—59 (In Russ.).
  2. Baumik S.K. The Difficulty of Controlling Corruption in Political Democracy. Trending Issues of Economy and Law. 2015; 4 (36): 26—35 (In Russ.).
  3. Gromyko A.A. Corruption in the Upper Echelons of Power in the UK. Scientific and Analytical Journal Observer. 2010; 10 (249): 117—128 (In Russ.).
  4. Drozdova O.A., Litovka A.B. Some Issues of Legal Regulation of Countering Corruption: Russian and Foreign Experience. Domestic Jurisprudence. 2017; 6 (20): 10—13 (In Russ.).
  5. Efimov G.V. Fighting Corruption in Singapore. Russia and the APR. 2008; 2 (60): 125—127 (In Russ.).
  6. Lazarev E.A. Political Corruption: Explaining the Nature of Post-Soviet Transformations. Polis. Political studies. 2010; 2: 106—121 (In Russ.).
  7. Lunev S.I. Indian Civilization in a Globalizing World. World Economy and International Relations. 2003; 3: 74—83 (In Russ.).
  8. Slonskaya M.S. Corruption in India: Scales and Methods of Dealing with It. Asia and Africa Today. 2015; 7 (696): 28—33 (In Russ.).
  9. Smirnova L.N. Combating Corruption in China: The UN Convention against Corruption and the “Special Chinese Model”. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 12: Political Science. 2015; 2: 71—90 (In Russ.).
  10. Suvorin E.V. Corruption and Democracy: The Paradoxes of the Relationship. Sociology of Power. 2008; 3: 113—121 (In Russ.).
  11. Kharicheva M.S. Singapore: History and Experience in the Fight against Corruption. The Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2011; 10: 98—102 (In Russ.).
  12. Chekhlatova E.A. The Development of Anti-corruption Counteractions in the UK. Pravovestnik. 2016; 1 (1): 44—45 (In Russ.).
  13. Shatokhin A.V. Comparative Legal Analysis of the Experience of Combating Corruption in the United States. Economics, Management and Law: Innovative Problem Solving. Digest of articles under the editorship of Gulyaev G. 2016: 173—175 (In Russ.).
  14. Yunchenko E., Mohorova A. Comparison of Methods of Fighting Corruption in China and Singapore. Actual Problems of Science and Practice. 2015; 1 (001): 65—71 (In Russ.).
  15. Agrawal C. Right to Information: A Tool for Combating Corruption in India. Journal of Management and Public Policy. 2012; 3 (2): 26.
  16. Alt J.E., Lassen D.D. The Political Economy of Institutions and Corruption in American States. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 2003; 15 (3): 341—365.
  17. Andvig J.C., Moene K.O. How Corruption May Corrupt. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 1990; 13 (1): 63—76.
  18. Anjaria J.S. Ordinary States: Everyday Corruption and the Politics of Space in Mumbai. American Ethnologist. 2011; 38 (1): 58—72.
  19. Anti-bribery and corruption training videos. City of London Police. Available from: cityoflondon.police.uk/advice-and-support/fraud-and-economic-crime/oacu/0780345890-fgldkemdDLdfdfdKWQ-03451980-cpvideo/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  20. Anti-Fraud and Corruption Policy & Response Plan. Greater London Authority. Available from: london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/anti-fraud_corruption_framework_-_jul_17.pdf. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  21. Bardhan P. Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues. Journal of Economic Literature. 1997; 35 (3): 1320—1346.
  22. Barr A., Serra D. Corruption and Culture: An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Public Economics. 2010; 94 (11, 12): 862—869.
  23. Berg L.L., Hahn H., Schmidhauser J.R. Corruption in the American Political System. General Learning Press; 1976. 250 p.
  24. Bussell J.L. Why Get Technical? Corruption and the Politics of Public Service. Reform in the Indian States. Comparative Political Studies. 2010; 43 (10); 1230—1257.
  25. Central Bureau of Investigation. Available from: cbi.gov.in/. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  26. Central Vigilance Commission. Available from: cvc.nic.in/. Accessed: 11.03.2019.
  27. Central Vigilance Commission: Eradicate Corruption — Build a New India. Available from: pledge.cvc.nic.in/. Accessed: 13.03.2019.
  28. Chowdhury R., Banerjee S., Nagarkoti D.S. Anna Hazare: A Corruption Crusader and His Grassroots Wisdom. Journal of Management Inquiry. 2017; 26 (4): 383—389.
  29. Citizen’s Charter. Government of India. Available from: goicharters.nic.in/ Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  30. Conservative MPs Sir Nicholas and Ann Winterton Broke Commons Expenses Rules. The Telegraph. 18.06.2008. Available from: telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/2151611/ Conservative-MPs-Sir-Nicholas-and-Ann-Winterton-broke-Commons-expenses-rules.html. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  31. Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB). Available from: cpib.gov.sg/about-cpib/our-heritage. Accessed: 12.03.2019.
  32. Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). Transparency International. Available from: https://www.transparency.org/research/cpi. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  33. Davis H. Ethics and Standards of Conduct. Public Management and Government. T. Bovaird, E. Loffler (Eds.). New York: Routledge; 2009: 213—223.
  34. Dimant E., Schulte T. The Nature of Corruption: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. German LJ. 2016; 17 (1): 53—72.
  35. Doig A. From Lynskey to Nolan: The Corruption of British Politics and Public Service. JL & Soc'y. 1996; 23: 36.
  36. Ekhator E.O. Public Sector Ethics in the United Kingdom: An Overview. Inkanyiso: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2012; 4 (2): 91—100.
  37. Freedom in the World—India 2016. Freedom House. Available from: freedomhouse.org/ report/freedom-world/2016/india. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  38. Glaeser E.L., Saks R.E. Corruption in America. Journal of Public Economics. 2006; 90 (6—7): 1053—1072.
  39. Gordon C. Costing and Curing Corruption in Public Transit Agencies: A Preliminary Assessment of New York and Los Angeles. Journal of Financial Crime. 2006; 13 (4): 442—455.
  40. Gowda M.R., Sridharan E. Reforming India's Party Financing and Election Expenditure Laws. Election Law Journal. 2012; 11 (2): 226—240.
  41. Grabova P. Corruption Impact on Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Economic Development, Management, IT, Finance, and Marketing. 2014; 6 (2): 57.
  42. Hager L.M. Bureaucratic Corruption in India: Legal Control of Maladministration. Comparative Political Studies. 1973; 6 (2): 197—219.
  43. Half of Conservative Party MEPs Ignoring Expenses Rules. The Telegraph. 08.06.2008. Available from: telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/2096020/Half-of-Conservative-Party-MEPs-ignoring-expenses-rules.html. Accessed: 10.03.2019.
  44. Harrods Big Spender Fights to Keep Mansion. BBC News. 25.07.2018. Available from: bbc.co.ukrhb/news/world-44954587. Accessed: 12.03.2019.
  45. Hazell R., Bourke G., Worthy B. Open House? Freedom of Information and Its Impact on the UK Parliament. Public Administration. 2012; 90 (4): 901—921.
  46. An Inspection of Arrangements to Ensure Integrity and to Provide the Capability to Tackle Corruption in Policing. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC). 2015. Available from: justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs/wp-content/uploads/police-integrity-and-corruption-2015.pdf. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  47. Heymann P.B. Democracy and Corruption. Fordham Int'l LJ. 1996; 20: 323.
  48. Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925. Available from: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1925/72/ pdfs/ukpga_19250072_en.pdf. Accessed: 10.03.2019.
  49. Mrs Caroline Spelman, Sixth Report of Session 2008—09. House of Commons. Committee on Standards and Privileges. 2009. Available from: publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/ cmselect/cmstnprv/316/9780215528964.pdf. Accessed: 10.03.2019.
  50. Jacobs J.B. Is Labor Union Corruption Special? Social Research. 2013; 80 (4): 1057—1086.
  51. Jain A.K. Corruption: A Review. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2001; 15 (1): 71—121.
  52. Jauregui B. Provisional Agency in India: Jugaad and Legitimation of Corruption. American Ethnologist. 2014; 41 (1): 76—91.
  53. Johnston M. Corruption and Political Culture in Britain and the United States. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 1989; 2 (4): 417—436.
  54. Johnston M. Corruption and Democratic Consolidation. Prepared for a Conference on “Democracy and Corruption”, Shelby Cullom Davis Center for Historical Studies. Princeton University March 12, 1999. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi= 10.1.1.203.1955&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  55. Johnstone P., Brown G. International Controls of Corruption: Recent Responses from the USA and the UK. Journal of Financial Crime. 2004; 11 (3): 217—248.
  56. Ko K., Samajdar A. Evaluation of International Corruption Indexes: Should We Believe Them or not? The Social Science Journal. 2010; 47 (3): 508—540.
  57. Lawton A., Macaulay M. From Birth to Death: The Life of the Standards Board for England. Public Administration Review. 2017; 77 (5): 720—729.
  58. Levitt S.D. Understanding why Crime Fell in the 1990s: Four Factors that Explain the Decline and Six that Do not. Journal of Economic perspectives. 2004; 18 (1): 163—190.
  59. Mastruzzi M., Kraay A., Kaufmann D. Governance Matters VI: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996—2006. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2007. 94 p.
  60. Mauro P. Corruption and Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1995; 110 (3): 681—712.
  61. Ministry of Communications and Information of Singapore. Available from: reach.gov.sg/ about-us/about-reach. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  62. Mohamed Nasir K., Turner B.S. Governing as Gardening: Reflections on Soft Authoritarianism in Singapore. Citizenship Studies. 2013; 17 (3—4): 339—352.
  63. New York City Charter (Chapter 34). Department of Investigation. Available from: 1.nyc.gov/html/records/pdf/section%201133_citycharter.pdf. Accessed: 12.03.2019.
  64. Newspaper and Printing Presses Act. Available from: singaporepress.pbworks.com/w/page/ 11489282/Newspaper%20and%20Printing%20Presses%20Act. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  65. The Global: Programme Against Corruption. UN Anti-Corruption Toolkit. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2nd edition. Vienna; 2004. 655 p. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/documents/corruption/Toolkit_ed2.pdf. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  66. OECD Economic Surveys: India 2017. OECD. Available from: oecd.org/eco/surveys/INDIA-2017-OECD-economic-survey-overview.pdf. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  67. Olken B.A., Pande R. Corruption in Developing Countries. Annu. Rev. Econ. 2012; 4 (1): 479—509.
  68. Peisakhin L., Pinto P. Is Transparency an Effective Anti‐corruption Strategy? Evidence from a Field Experiment in India. Regulation & Governance. 2010; 4 (3): 261—280.
  69. Prevention of Corruption Act. Singapore Statutes Online Plus. Available from: sso.agc.gov.sg/ Act/PCA1960?ProvIds=legis#legis. Accessed: 12.03.2019.
  70. Public Service Division. Available from: psd.gov.sg/. Accessed: 13.03.2019.
  71. Q&A: MP Expenses Row Explained. BBC News. 14.03.2010. Available from: news.bbc.co.uk/ 2/hi/uk_news/politics/8301443.stm. Accessed: 11.03.2019.
  72. Quah J.S. Police Corruption in Singapore: An Analysis of Its Forms, Extent and Causes. Singapore Police Journal. 1979; 10 (1): 7—43.
  73. Quah J.S. Combating Corruption in Singapore: What Can be Learned? Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 2001; 9 (1): 29—35.
  74. Quah J.S. Anti-corruption Agencies in Four Asian Countries: A Comparative Analysis. Comparative Governance Reform in Asia: Democracy, Corruption, and Government Trust. 2008: 85—109.
  75. Quah J.S. Singapore’s Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau: Four Suggestions for Enhancing Its Effectiveness. Asian Education and Development Studies. 2015; 4 (1): 76—100.
  76. Quah J.S. Singapore’s Success in Combating Corruption: Lessons for Policy Makers. Asian Education and Development Studies. 2017; 6 (3): 263—274.
  77. Republic of Singapore, Government Gazette Acts Supplement. Singapore: Singapore National Printers; 1989; 13.
  78. Revealed: How Gangs Used the Freemasons to Corrupt Police. The Independent. 13.01.2014. Available from: russian.rt.com/article/20834. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  79. Riley P., Roy R.K. Corruption and Anticorruption: The Case of India. Journal of Developing Societies. 2016; 32 (1): 73—99.
  80. Rose-Ackerman S. The Political Economy of Corruption. Corruption and the Global Economy. 1997; 31. 60 p.
  81. Rose-Ackerman S., Truex R. Corruption and Policy Reform. Yale Law & Economics Research Paper; 2012. 444 p.
  82. Salmon T.C., Serra D. Corruption, Social Judgment and Culture: An Experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2017; 142: 64—78.
  83. Sproat P.A. To what Extent is the UK's Anti-money Laundering and Asset Recovery Regime Used against Organised Crime? Journal of Money Laundering Control. 2009; 12 (2): 134—150.
  84. Sun T.W. Governing Singapore: The Group Representation Constituency (GRC) System and Its Effect on Inclusiveness and Electoral Participation. Asian Education and Development Studies. 2015; 4 (3): 282—298.
  85. Tanzi V. Corruption around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures. Staff Papers. 1998; 45 (4): 559—594.
  86. The Corruption (Confiscation of Benefits). Bill No. 7/1989. Singapore Statutes Online Plus. Available from: sso.agc.gov.sg/Bills-Supp/7-1989/Published/19890116?DocDate=19890116. Accessed: 14.03.2019.
  87. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013. Available from: prsindia.org/uploads/media/Lok% 20Pal%20Bill%202011/Lokpal_Bill_as_passed_by_both_Houses.pdf. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  88. The NYC Campaign Finance Board. Available from: nyccfb.info/. Accessed:18.03.2019.
  89. The NYC Commission to Combat Police Corruption. Available from: 1.nyc.gov/site/ccpc/ index.page. Accessed: 18.03.2019.
  90. The NYC Conflicts of Interest Board. Available from: 1.nyc.gov/site/coib/index.page. Accessed: 18.03.2019.
  91. Tony McNulty, Benefit Cheat. The Spectator. 26.03.2009. Available from: blogs.spectator.co.uk/ 2009/03/tony-mcnulty-benefit-cheat. Accessed: 15.03.2019.
  92. Tory MPs Were Paid to Plant Questions Says Harrods Chief. The Guardian. 20.10.1994. Available from: theguardian.com/politics/1994/oct/20/conservatives.uk. Accessed: 16.03.2019.
  93. Corruption Perceptions Index 2018. Transparency International. Available from: transparency.org/ cpi2018. Accessed: 27.03.2019.
  94. How Corruption Weakens Democracy. Transparency International. 29.01.2019. Available from: transparency.org/news/feature/cpi_2018_global_analysis. Accessed: 25.03.2019.
  95. People and Corruption: Asia Pacific (2017). Transparency International. Available from: transparency.org/whatwedo/publication/people_and_corruption_asia_pacific_global_corruption_ barometer. Accessed: 25.03.2019.
  96. Treisman D. The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-national Study. Journal of Public Economics. 2000; 76 (3): 399—457.
  97. United Kingdom Anti-Corruption Strategy 2017. Available from: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/ government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/667221/6_3323_Anti-Corruption_ Strategy_WEB.pdf. Accessed: 13.03.2019.
  98. Verma R.K., Kumar S., Ilavarasan P.V. Government Portals, Social Media Platforms and Citizen Engagement in India: Some Insights. Procedia Computer Science. 2017; 122: 842—849.
  99. Vijayalakshmi V. Rent-seeking and Gender in Local Governance. The Journal of Development Studies. 2008; 44 (9): 1262—1288.
  100. Weschle S. Punishing Personal and Electoral Corruption: Experimental Evidence from India. Research & Politics. 2016; 3 (2): 1—6.
  101. Weyland K.G. The Politics of Corruption in Latin America. Journal of Democracy. 1998; 9 (2): 108—121.
  102. Whyte D. How Corrupt is Britain? London: Pluto Press; 2015. 198 p.
  103. Will Growth Slow Corruption in India? Forbes. 15.08.2007. Available from: forbes.com/ 2007/08/15/wipro-tata-corruption-ent-law-cx_kw_0814whartonindia.html#64b86a3d203f. Accessed: 15.03.2019.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 410

PDF (Russian) - 178

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2019 Strakhov A.P.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies