Cover Page


The year of 2017 has special significance in Russia. The events taken place one hundred years ago fundamentally changed the direction of Russian society’ development and the system of existed so-cial relations as well as form of government, political regime and legal system. The revolution happens when the government is unable to move the society forward by improving social relations existing in-side it. The revolution always denies existing social order, it has deep social roots and is not one-moment but long-term process that changes radically the whole system of relations. It could be defined as a new sociocultural programme implemented according to the interests of social powers that have just taken over the government. In revolutionary conditions, when one social order is being changed by another one, the law plays special role. Authors analyze tendencies of development of Soviet law and legal science. They show how sociologism of early Soviet socialistic law by the end of 1930-s was changed by etatistic positiv-ism. Marxist theory used by the Bolsheviks was a form of sociological theories because social interests considered as its determining part. From 1917 Bolsheviks’ social practice had pronounced sociological destination based on artistic (including lawmaking) activity of working people. But by the end of 1930ths Soviet law came under strong influence of etatistic positivism that mediated domination of par-ty-governmental system. Marx-Lenin conceptions about socialistic society as a system of relations based of social equality and justice were not brought to life and did not determine Soviet state and law’ type. Identification of interests as real reasons of social actions enables to find out genuine social structure of the Soviet socie-ty in which specificity of legal administration was predestined by the struggle between party-state bu-reaucracy and broad strata of working people. There were principal divergences between legally regu-lated social structure and relations that really existed in the same society. Deformation of social rela-tions predoomed the fall of the soviet system on the cusp of the 1980ths and 1990ths.

Marina V Nemytina

Principal contact for editorial correspondence.
RUDN University Law Institute 6, Miklukho-Maklaya st., Moscow 117198, Russia

Nemytina Marina V. - Doctor of Legal Science, Professor, Head of Department of History of Law and State, Institute of Law, People’s Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University).

Tsybik Ts Mikheeva
RUDN University Law Institute 6, Miklukho-Maklaya st., Moscow 117198, Russia

Mikheeva Tsybik Ts. - Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of History of Law and State, Institute of Law, People’s Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University).

  • (1931) Rezolyutsiya I Vsesoyuznogo s’ezda marksistov-gosudarstvennikov i pravovikov po dokladam E. Pashukanisa i Ya. Bermana [Resolution of the 1st All-Union Congress of Marxist-statists and legalists on the reports of E. Pashukanis and J. Berman]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i revolyutsiya prava [The Soviet State and the Revolution of Law]. (3), 143–153. (in Russian)
  • Berman, H. J. (1983) Zapadnaya traditsiya prava. Epokha formirovaniya [Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition]. Translated from English by Nikonova, N. R. (1998) Moscow, MGU Publ., Izdatel'skaya gruppa Infra-M–Norma. (in Russian)
  • Bowring, B. (2011) Marx, Lenin and Pashukanis on Self-Determination: Response to Robert Knox. Historical Materialism. 19 (2), 113–127. Available from: doi: 10.1163/156920611x573833.
  • Bowring, B. (2017) Yevgeniy Pashukanis, His Law and Marxism: A General Theory, and the 1922 Treaty of Rapallo between Soviet Russia and Germany. Journal of the History of Interna-tional Law. Revue d'histoire du droit international. 19 (2), 1–22. Available from: doi: 10.1163/15718050-19231033.
  • Chestnov, I. L. (2012) Kul'turologicheskoe izmerenie prava [Culturological Dimension of Law] In: Nemytina, M. V., Muromtsev, G. I. (eds.) Pravovye kul'tury. [Legal Сultures. Zhidkov’s readings: Procedings of All-Russian Scientific Conference,25 March 2011, Moscow]. Moscow, PFUR. pp. 6–13. (in Russian)
  • Goldstone, J. A. (1991) An analytical framework. In: Gurr, T., Moshiri, F. & Goldstone, J. Revolutions of the late twentieth century. Boulder, CO, Westview Press, pp. 37–51.
  • Head, M. (2007) Evgeny Pashukanis: A critical reappraisal. New York, Taylor & Francis e-Library.
  • James, C.D. (1962) Toward a Theory of Revolution. American Sociological Review. 27 (1), pp. 5–19.
  • Johnson, Ch. (1982) Revolutionary changes. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
  • Kapustin, B. G. (2015) O ponyatii «revolyutsiya» [About the concept of «revolution»]. In: Il’inskaya, S.G. (ed.) Revolyutsiya kak kontsept i sobytie [Revolution as a concept and event]. Moscow, OOO «TsIUMiNL», pp. 6–31. (in Russian)
  • Kuricyn, V. M. (1983) Stanovlenie socialisticheskoj zakonnosti [The Formation of Socialist Legality]. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo Nauka. (in Russian)
  • Lenin, V. I. (1970) Velikii pochin [The Great initiative]. In: Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Col-lected Works]. Vol. 39. Moscow, Politizdat. (in Russian)
  • Lenin, V. I. (1973) “Krest'yanskaya reforma” i proletarski-krest'yanskaya revolyutsiya [“The Peasant Reform” and the Proletarian-Peasant Revolution]. In: Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Col-lected Works]. Vol. 20. Moscow, Politicheskaya literatura Publ. (in Russian)
  • Lichbach, M. & Gurr, T. (1981) The Conflict Process: A Formal Model. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 25 (1), 3–29. Available from: doi: 10.1177/002200278102500101.
  • Mal'tsev, G. V. (1999) Ponimanie prava. Podkhody i problemy [Understanding of the Law. Approaches and problems]. Moscow, Prometei. (in Russian)
  • Nikiforov, A. A. (2007). Revolution as Subject of Theoretical Treatment: the Sub-Discipline’s Progress and Dilemmas. Polis. Political Studies. (5), 92–104. Available from: doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqu014. (in Russian)
  • Pashukanis, E. B. (1923) Obzor literatury po obshchei teorii prava i gosudarstva [The Review of the Literature On The General Theory of Law and the State]. Vestnik Sotsialisticheskoi akade-mii [Bulletin of the Socialist Academy]. (5), 227–232. (in Russian)
  • Pashukanis, E. B. (1926) Obshchaya teoriya prava i marksizm [The General Theory of Law and Marxism]. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo Kommunisticheskoi Akademii. (in Russian)
  • Pashukanis, E. B. (1936) Gosudarstvo i pravo pri sotsializme [The State and Law under So-cialism]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo [The Soviet State]. (3), 3–11. (in Russian)
  • Pashukanis, E. B. (1980) Izbrannye trudy po obshchei teorii prava i gosudarstva [Selected Works on the General Theory of Law and the State]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (in Russian)
  • Petukhova, A. V. (2012) Sotsiologicheskaya kontseptsiya prava v Rossii: istoriko-teoreticheskii podkhod (XIX–XX vv.) [The Sociological Concept of Law in Russia: the Historical-Theoretical Approach (XIX–XX centuries). Abstract of Dissertation of Candidate of Legal Sci-ences. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. (in Russian)
  • Razumovsky, I. (1925) Problemy marksistskoi teorii prava [The problems of the Marxist theory of law]. Moscow, Kommunisticheskaya Akademiya Publ. (in Russian)
  • Razumovsky, I. P. (1923) Ponyatie prava u Marksa i Engel'sa [The concept of law in Marx and Engels]. Under the Banner of Marxism. (2–3), 68–97. (in Russian)
  • Skocpol, T. (1979) States and social revolutions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Tilly, C. (1973) Does Modernization Breed Revolution? Comparative Politics. 5 (3), 425–447. Available from: doi: 10.2307/421272.
  • Solomko, Z. V. (2011) Rannesovetskaya marksistskaya teoriya prava v kontekste sovremen-noi politiko-pravovoi mysli [Early Soviet Marxist Theory of Law in the Context of Modern Politi-cal and Legal Thought]. Uchenye zapiski Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial'nogo universiteta [Scientific notes of RSSU]. (5), 124–127. (in Russian)
  • Stepin, V. S. (2011) Tsivilizatsiya i kul'tura [Civilization and culture]. Saint Petersburg, SPbGUP. (in Russian)
  • Stuchka, P. (1919) Proletarskoe pravo [Proletarian law]. In: Oktyabr'skii perevorot i diktatura proletariata: sbornik statei [The October Revolution and the dictatorship of the proletariat: the collection of articles]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo. (in Russian)
  • Stuchka, P. (1931) Moi put' i moi oshibki [My way and my mistakes]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i revolyutsiya prava [Soviet state and the revolution of law]. (5–6), 67–97. (in Russian)
  • Stuchka, P. I. (1964) Izbrannye proizvedeniya po marksistsko-leninskoi teorii prava. [The Se-lected works on the Marxist-Leninist Theory of Law]. Riga, Latviiskoe gosudarstvennoe iz-datel'stvo. (in Russian)
  • Stuchka, P. (1921) Revolyutsionnaya rol' prava i gosudarstva: Obshchee uchenie o prave i o gosudarstve [The revolutionary role of law and state: The general doctrine of law and the state]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo. (in Russian)
  • Tikhonovsky, F. I. (2009) Ponimanie prava v sovetskoi yuridicheskoi nauke (1917–1938 gg.) [The Understanding of the Law in Soviet Legal Science (1917–1938). Abstract of Dissertation of Candidate of Legal Sciences. The Russian Presidential Academy of Public Administration. (in Russian)
  • Tomsinov, V. A. (2017) Fevral'skaya revolyutsiya 1917 goda v Rossii kak tekhnologiya raz-rusheniya gosudarstva [The February Revolution of 1917 in Russia as a Technology for the De-struction of the State]. Slavyane. (4), 9–15. (in Russian)
  • Zaslavskaya, T. I. (2003) Sotsietal'naya transformatsiya rossiiskogo obshchestva: Deyatel'nostno-strukturnaya kontseptsiya [The Societal Transformation of Russian Society: The Activity-Structural Concept]. Moscow, Delo. (in Russian)


Abstract - 45

PDF (Russian) - 43


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments

Copyright (c) 2017 Nemytina M.V., Mikheeva T.T.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.