Legate against the Emperor: the beginning, course and results of the revolt of Antonius Saturninus

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of the work is to analyze the causes, course and consequences of the rebellion of Anthony Saturninus, directed against the emperor Domitian (89 AD). After analyzing the strategic situation in the western provinces and the course of events, the author proves that the performance was poorly prepared, was of a spontaneous nature and was doomed to failure from the very beginning. The author’s conclusions: a thorough analysis of the sources suggests that the initiative of the rebellion of Saturninus belonged to the mass of soldiers, while for Saturninus himself, the imperial acclamation, most likely, was a complete surprise. In 97 AD, the highest commanding staff of the Roman army, mindful of the circumstances of the defeat and death of Saturninus, managed to prevent a civil war by guaranteeing the transfer of power from Emperor Nerva to the protege of the military, Mark Ulpius Trajan.

About the authors

Victor Nikolaevich Parfyonov

Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary

Author for correspondence.
Email: vparfenov@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3612-0197

doctor of historical sciences, professor, professor of the Department of Church History

92, Michurina str., Saratov, Russian Federation, 410028

References

  1. Parfenov VN. K otsenke prichin miatezha Antonija Saturnina [On Evaluating the Reasons for the Revolt of Antonius Saturninus]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History; 2018; 63 (3): 845–857. (In Russ.).
  2. Campbell JB. The Emperor and the Roman Army. 31 B.C. — A.D. 235. Oxford: University Press; 1984, 468 p.
  3. Jones BW. The Emperor Domitian. London; New York: Routledge; 1992. 292 p.
  4. Parfyonov VN. Quartum stipendium Domitsiana I rimskije financy [Quartum stipendium of Domitian and Roman finances] In: Economics, law, power in the ancient world. Dedicated to the memory of V.I. Kuzishchin. Saprykin SYu, Gvozdeva IA, editors. St. Petersburg, 2021, p. 131–161. (In Russ.).
  5. Syme R. Antonius Saturninus. In: Syme R. Roman Papers. Ed. by A.R. Birley. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984, vol. III, p. 1070–1084.
  6. Knabe GS. Kornelij Tazit. Vremia. Zhisnʼ. Knigi [Cornelius Tacitus. Time. Life. Books]. M., Nauka, 1981, 206 p.
  7. Eck W. Die Statthalter der germanischen Provinzen vom 1.–3. Jahrhundert. Köln: Rheinland-Verlag; Bonn, Habelt, 1985, XII, 282 p.
  8. Kienast D. Römische Kaisertabelle: Grundzüge einer römischen Kaiserchronologie. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1990, 399 p.
  9. Southern P. Domitian: Tragic Tyrant. London, 1997, 164 p.
  10. Syme R. Domitian: The Last Years // Syme R. Roman Papers / A.R. Birley (ed.). Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1988, vol. IV, p. 252–277.
  11. Strobel K. Der Aufstand des L. Antonius Saturninus und der sogenannte zweite Chattenkrieg Domitians. Tyche. 1986; (1): 203–220.
  12. Flaig E. Den Kaiser herausfordern. Die Usurpation im Römischen Reich. 2. Auf. Frankfurt; New York, Campus Verlag, 2019, 568 p.
  13. Syme R. Rhine and Danube Legions under Domitian. JRS. 1928; (18): 41–55.
  14. Alföldy G. Die Truppenverteilung der Donaulegionen am Ende des 1. Jahrhunderts. AArch. 1959; XI (1–4): 113–141.
  15. Schönberger H. The Roman Frontier in Germany: An Archaeological Survey. JRS. 1969; 59 (1–2): 144–197.
  16. Eder W. Sacramentum militare. DNP. Stuttgart; Weimar, Metzler; 2001. 10. p. 1200.
  17. Makhlayuk AV. Auctor seditionis. K charakteristike voennogo myatezha v Drevnem Rime [On the characteristics of the military rebellion in Ancient Rome]. In: Prawo w srednevekowom mire. Sbornik statei. St. Petersburg, Aleteya; 2001; 2–3, p. 290–308. (In Russ.).
  18. Stocks C. Broken Bonds: Perfidy and the Discourse of Civil War // Fides in Flavian Literature. Edd. A. Augoustakis, E. Buckley, C. Stocks. Toronto; Buffalo; London, University of Toronto Press, 2019, p. 21–44.
  19. Syme R. Flavian Wars and Frontiers. CAH. Cambridge, University Press, 1936. XI, p. 131–187.
  20. Dorey TA. Agricola and Domitian. G&R. Second Series. 1960; VII (1): 66–71.
  21. Grant M. The Army of the Caesars. London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1974. 365 p.
  22. Pekáry Th.: Unruhen und Revolten im Römischen Reich von Augustus bis Commodus. AncSoc. 1987; (18): 133–150.
  23. Parfenov VN. Sallustij Lukull, legat Britanii: zagovorshchik ili nevinnaia zhertva? [Sallustius Lucullus, Britanniae Legatus: Conspirator or Innocent Victim?]. Mnemon. 2017; 17 (1): 125–144. (In Russ.).
  24. Syme R. Tacitus. Oxford, Clarendon Press; 1958, vol. I, IX, 464 p.
  25. Hanslik RM. Ulpius Traianus. Römischer Kaiser 98–117. RE. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1965; Spplbd. 10, col. 1035–1102.
  26. Seyfarth W. Römische Geschichte. Kaiserzeit 1. 3., bericht. Aufl. Berlin, Akademie-Verlag, 1980, 329 p.
  27. Walser G. Kaiser Domitian in Mainz. Chiron. 1989; 19: 449–460.
  28. Christ K. Geschichte der römischen Kaiserzeit. Von Augustus bis zu Konstantin. 4. Aufl. München, Beck; 2002, 882 p.
  29. Pfeiffer S. Die Zeit der Flavier. Vespasian – Titus – Domitian. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft; 2009, 146 p.
  30. Venning T. A Chronology of the Roman Empire. London, Continuum; 2011, 850 p.
  31. Eck W. Traian – Der Weg zum Kaisertum. In: Traian. Ein Kaiser der Superlative am Beginn einer Umbruchzeit. A. Nünnerich-Asmus (ed.). Mainz am Rhein, Verlag Philipp von Zabern; 2002, p. 7–20.
  32. Eck W. Traians Herrschaftsbeginn in Germania inferior und seine Städtepolitik in dieser Provinz. In: Trajan und seine Städte. Colloquium Cluj-Napoca, 29. September – 2. Oktober 2013. Cluj-Napoca, Mega Verlag; 2014, p. 101–109.
  33. Knyazʼkij I.O. Imperator Traian [The Emperor Trajan]. St. Petersburg, Aleteia, 2016, 159 p. (In Russ.).
  34. Parfyonov VN. Traian i miatezh Antoniya Saturnina [Trajan and the Revolt of Antonius Saturninus] RUDN Journal of World History. 2021; (13)3: 319–328. (In Russ.). https:// doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2021-13-3-319-328
  35. Seelentag G. Taten und Tugenden Traians. Herrschaftsdarstellung im Principat. Stuttgart: Franz-Steiner-Verlag; 2004. 556 p.
  36. Weynand R. Flavius (Domitianus). In: RE. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1909. Bd. 6, col. 2541–2596.
  37. Ritterling E. Legio (Domitian). In: RE. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1924. Hbd. 23, col. 1275–1280.
  38. Murison CL. The Revolt of Saturninus in Upper Germany, A.D. 89. Echos du monde classique: Classicas views. 1985; (29), n.s. 4, no. 1: 31–49.
  39. Walser G. Der Putsch des Saturninus gegen Domitian. In: Provincialia. Festschrift für Rudolf Laur-Belart. E. Schmit, L. Berger, P. Bürgin (eds.). Basel: Schwabe, 1968, p. 497–507.
  40. Jones BW. Senatorial Influence in the Revolt of Saturninus. Latomus. 1974 ; (33):529–535.
  41. Le Gall J., Le Glay M. L’Empire Romain. T. 1. Le Haut-Empire de la bataille d’Actium (31 av. J. -C.) à l’assasinat de Sèvére Alexandre (235 ap. J. -C.). Paris, Presses universitaires de France; 1987. 673 p.
  42. Grainger JD. The Roman Imperial Succession. Philadelphia, Pen & Sword Military; 2020. XV, 320 p.
  43. Gsell S. Essai sur le règne de lʼempereur Domitien. Thèse de doctorat. P., Thorin & fils éditeurs; 1893. 391 p.
  44. Štaerman EM. Svetonij i ego vremia [Suetonius and his Time]. In: Gai Svetonij Trankvill. Zhisnʼ dvenadzati tsezarei. M., Nauka, 1964, p. 249–262. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2023 Parfyonov V.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies