Religion in qirat Qing dynasty politics
- Authors: Kitinov B.U.1, Qiang L.2
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Oriental Studies RAS
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
- Issue: Vol 11, No 1 (2019)
- Pages: 44-55
- Section: Oriental Studies
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/world-history/article/view/22472
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2019-11-1-44-55
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
During 1680s-1750s the Qing dynasty in its relations with the Oirats (Jungars and Khoshuts) actively used the potential and significance of Buddhism to achieve its main goal - the subordination of these nomads. At the same time, it had acted as a peacemaker and legislator, seeking to put under dynasty’s control not only the Oirat-Tibetan relations, but also the education of the Oirat lamas, and had tried to get them for their education in the Beijing Buddhist monasteries. In case of overt or covert insubordination, Beijing usually accused Oirat rulers in their rejection of Buddha’s teaching and conversion to Islam, claiming itself to be the only true defender of the teachings of Geluk school and personally the Dalai Lama. Such a policy, along with a complex political process in Tibet, and the Oirat internal strife, had had its impact on the crisis in the Oirat community in the middle of XVIII century.
About the authors
Baatr U. Kitinov
Institute of Oriental Studies RAS
Author for correspondence.
Email: histj@rudn.university
PhD, Associates Professor, Senior research fellow, Department of history of East
12 Rozhdestvenka St., Moscow, 107031, RussiaLiu Qiang
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Email: histj@rudn.university
PhD student of the Department of World History
6 Miklukho-Maklaya, Moscow, 117198, RussiaReferences
- Lyulina A.G. Tibetan institutions of authority and the Qing administration system: peculiarities of interaction (mid.17th – late 18th centuries). Diss.. Ph.D. Moscow, 2017. 183 p. (In Russian)
- Martynov A.S. The status of Tibet in the XVII-XVIII centuries in the traditional Chinese system of political ideas. Moscow: Science, 1978. 284 p. (In Russian)
- Su yi la. Wei la te – Xi meng gu wen hua bian qian (Oirats – the Cultural Change in Western Mongolia). Beijing, 2002. 221 p. (In Chinese)
- Uspensky V.L. Tibetan Buddhism in Beijing. St. Petersburg: NP-Print Studio, 2011. 368 p. (In Russian)
- Sperling Elliot. Pho-lha-nas, Khang-chen-nas, and the last era of Mongol domination in Tibet// Rocznik Orientalistyczny, 2012, t. 65, z. 1, pp. 195–211.
- Qing shi lu zhun ga er shi liao zhai bian (Materials from Qing True Records on the history of Dzungaria). Wu lu mu qi. 1987.