Influence of the soil base on the stress-strain state of a large-span building with a cylinder-and-slab roof

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The authors consider finite element models of a large-span building with a cylinder-and-slab roof as a large spatial mechanical system with different boundary conditions. The first model represents the superstructure of the building with a fixed-end at the soil base level. In the second model, the superstructure is based on the substructure, which includes a pile foundation and a soil base with different physical and mechanical properties. The purpose of the study is a comparative numerical analysis of the stress-strain state of a large-span building with different boundary conditions. The numerical study revealed the influence of the structural features of the substructure of the building, as well as the physical and mechanical properties of the soil base on the stress-strain state of the long-span roof and the building as a whole. Numerical static analysis of spatial finite element models of a large-span building was carried out in the СAE class Femap NX Nastran software package. The results of the static analysis demonstrated a significant structural influence of the substructure of a large-span building on the characteristics of its stress-strain state. In the next article, it is proposed to conduct a modal analysis for these building models.

About the authors

Elvira R. Kuzhakhmetova

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: elja_09@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0907-786X

engineer, senior lecturer, Department of Reinforced Concrete and Stone Structures

26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation

Valerii I. Sutyrin

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

Email: vsutyrin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4911-8515

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Institute of Engineering and Technology

14 Alexandra Nevskogo St, Kaliningrad, 236041, Russian Federation

References

  1. Kuzhakhmetova E.R., Sapozhnikov A.I. Architectural expressiveness and physiological expediency of buildings with curvilinear surfaces. Building Materials, Equipment, Technologies of the 21st Century. 2012;11(166):42–45. (In Russ.)
  2. Sapozhnikov A.I. The life of buildings in the earth element. LAP Lamber Academic Publishing; 2014. (In Russ.)
  3. Vinogradov G.G. Calculation of building spatial structures. Leningrad: Stroiizdat Publ.; 1990. (In Russ.)
  4. Gokhar’-Harmadaryan I.G. Wide-span dome buildings. Мoscow: Stroyizdat Publ.; 1978. (In Russ.)
  5. Lipnizkiy M.E. Domes. Calculation and design. Leningrad: Stroyizdat Publ.; 1973. (In Russ.)
  6. Zimin S.S., Bespalov V.V., Kokotkova O.D. Vault structures of historical buildings. Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures. 2015;(2):57–72. (In Russ.)
  7. Mamieva I.A. Analytical surfaces for parametric architecture in contemporary buildings and structures. Academia. Architecture and Construction. 2020;(1):150‒165. (In Russ.)
  8. Mamieva I.A. Analytical surfaces in the architecture of Moscow. Structural Mechanics of Engineering Constructions and Buildings. 2013;(4):9‒15. (In Russ.)
  9. Krivoshapko S.N., Mamieva I.A. Umbrella surfaces and surfaces of umbrella type in architecture. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2011;(7‒1): 27‒30. (In Russ.)
  10. Krivoshapko S.N., Alborova L.A., Mamieva I.A. Shell structures: genesis, materials and subtypes. Part 1. Subtypes and directions. Academia. Architecture and Construction. 2021;(3):125‒134. http://doi.org/10.22337/2077-9038-2021-3-125-134. (In Russ.)
  11. Krivoshapko S.N., Alborova L.A., Mamieva I.A. Shell structures: genesis, materials and subtypes. Part 2. Constructive building materials Academia. Architecture and Construction. 2021;(4):110‒119. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.22337/2077-9038-2021-4-110-119
  12. Kuzhakhmetova E.R. Features of the stress-strain state of a building with a cylinder-plate-cablestayed coating. Topical Issues of Modern Science: a Collection of Articles based on the Materials of the XII International Scientific and Practical Conference, Tomsk, 23 May 2018 (part 1). Tomsk: Dendra Publ.; 2018. p. 93–98. (In Russ.)
  13. Park K., Park M., Shin S. Design of large space cable roofs with retractable systems to open and close. International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology. 2017;8(4–1):197–203. http://doi.org/10.21172/1.841.34
  14. Grunwalda G., Hermekingb T., Prangc T. Kinetic roof structure: Msheireb Heart of Doha. Procedia Engineering. 2016;155:289–296. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.031
  15. Kuzhakhmetova E.R. Numerical design of frame buildings taking into account the generalized stiffness and load of soil and foundation. Bulletin of BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov. 2019;(12):34–46. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.34031/2071-7318-2019-4-12-34-46
  16. Popova A., Strakhov D., Sinyakov L. Numerical analysis of ground-structure interaction for framed building with isolated footings. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. 2021;150:304‒315. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72404-7_30
  17. Chandiwala A., Savaliya M., Vasanwala S. Soil-structure interaction on pile raft foundation in multi-story RC building with vertical irregularity. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. 2021;138:437‒445.
  18. Mirsayapov I., Shakirov I., Nurieva D. Numerical studies of soil base deformations from reconstructed multi-storey building to nearby buildings. E3S Web of Conferences.2021;274:03020.
  19. Wang H., Zhang R. Dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction of piled high-rise buildings under earthquake excitations I: influence on dynamic response. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures. 2021;18(3):e357. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78256223
  20. Wu M. Analysis of the influence of pile foundation settlement of high-rise buildings on surrounding buildings. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2020;13:822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05832-7
  21. Bhattacharjee T., Chanda D., Saha R. Influence of soil flexibility and plan asymmetry on seismic behaviour of soil-piled raft-structure system. Structures. 2021;33:1775‒1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.045
  22. Baimakhan R.B., Kadirova Z.B., Seinassinova A.A., Baimakhan A.R., Baimakhanova G.M. Calculation model of the “building-foundation” system on anisotropic base and deformation calculations. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences. 2021;9(1):308‒321. http://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v9i1.1807
  23. Mirsayapov I., Koroleva I. Long-term settlements assessment of high-rise building groundbase based on analytical ground deformation diagram. Procedia Engineering. 2016;165:519‒527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.728
  24. Khoshnoudian F., Ziaei R., Ayyobi P. Effects of nonlinear soil-structure interaction on the seismic response of structure-TMD systems subjected to near-field earthquakes. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2017;15:199–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9963-y
  25. Gentile C., Guidobaldi M., Saisi A. One-year dynamic monitoring of a historic tower: damage detection under changing environment. Meccanica. 2016;51:2873–2889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0482-3
  26. Ubertini F., Cavalagli N., Kita A. Assessment of a monumental masonry bell-tower after 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence by long-term SHM. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2018;16:775–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0222-7
  27. Azzara R.M., Girardi M., Padovani C., Pellegrini D. Experimental and numerical investigations on the seismic behaviour of the San Frediano bell tower in Lucca. Annals of Geophysics. 2019:62(3):SE342. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8025
  28. Cuadra C., Karkee M.B., Tokeshi K. Earthquake risk to Inca’s historical constructions in Machupicchu. Advances in Engineering Software. 2008;39(4):336‒345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.01.002
  29. Karapetroa S., Manakou M., Bindi D., Petrovic B., Pitilakis K. “Time-building specific” seismic vulnerability assessment of a hospital RC building using field monitoring data. Engineering Structures. 2016;112(1):114‒132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.009
  30. Karatzetzou A., Pitilakis D. Reduction factors to evaluate acceleration demand of soil-foundation-structure systems. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2018;109:199‒208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.03.017
  31. Karafagka S., Fotopoulou S., Pitilakis D. Fragility assessment of non-ductile RC frame buildings exposed to combined ground shaking and soil liquefaction considering SSI. Engineering Structures. 2021;229(15):111629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111629
  32. Forcellini D., Giardi F., Tanganelli M. Seismic assessment of the historical third tower in San Marino based on a 3D laser scanner survey (3D-LSS). Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. 2019;4(20). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-019-0207-2
  33. Forcellini D. Analytical fragility curves of shallow-founded structures subjected to soil-structure interaction (SSI) effects. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2021;41:106487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106487
  34. Cavalieri F., Correia A.A., Crowley H. Seismic fragility analysis of URM buildings founded on piles: influence of dynamic soil-structure interaction models. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2020;18:4127–4156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00853-9
  35. Bolisetti C., Whittaker A.S., Coleman J.L. Linear and nonlinear soil-structure interaction analysis of buildings and safety-related nuclear structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2018;107:218–233.
  36. Ashayeri I., Biglari M., Formisano A., D'Amatoc M. Ambient vibration testing and empirical relation for natural period of historical mosques. Case study of eight mosques in Kermanshah, Iran. Construction and Building Materials. 2021;289:123191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123191
  37. Kuzhakhmetova E.R. Stress-strain state cylinder-plate-cable-stayed roof buildings (structures) with various forms of external support contour. Structural Mechanics of Engineering Constructions and Buildings. 2020;16(2):95–110. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.22363/1815-5235-2020-16-2-95-110
  38. Kuzhakhmetova E.R. Constructive solutions of guys location in cylindrical-slab-guy covering of building (construction). Bulletin of BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov. 2019;(5):77–89. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.34031/article_5ce292ca24bc23.91006970
  39. Kuzhakhmetova E.R. Dipping, calculation and construction of the monolithic reinforced concrete pile of the conical form. Scientific Review. Technical Sciences. 2017;(2):57–64. (In Russ.)
  40. Kuzhakhmetova E.R. Research of stress-deformed state of the rammed monolithic reinforced concrete cone-shaped piles with side and bottom forms from crushed stones. Structural Mechanics of Engineering Constructions and Buildings. 2021;17(4):335–356. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.22363/1815-5235-2021-17-4-335-356
  41. Kuzhakhmetova E.R. Influence of constructive solutions on the stiffness characteristics of the rammed monolithic reinforced concrete cone-shaped piles with side and bottom forms from crushed stones. Structural Mechanics of Engineering Constructions and Buildings. 2021;17(5):500–518. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.22363/1815-5235-2021-17-5-500-518
  42. Kuzhakhmetova E.R., Sapozhnikov A.I. Comparative analysis of long and short piles with horizontal uploading. Building Materials, Equipment, Technologies of the XXI Century. 2015;(5–6):30–34. (In Russ.)
  43. Sapozhnikov A.I., Kuzhakhmetova E.R. Deep immersion and deformation calculation of a monolithic pile-shell of large diameter. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of Scientific and Pedagogical Workers of Astrakhan State Technical University, Dedicated to the 85th Anniversary from the Basis of the University. Astrakhan; 2015. p. 191–192. (In Russ.)
  44. Rychkov S.P. Structural modeling in Femap with NX Nastran. Moscow: DMK Press; 2013. (In Russ.)
  45. Shimkovich D.G. Structural analysis in MSC/Nastran for Windows. Moscow: DMK Press; 2003. (In Russ.)
  46. Zienkiewich O.C. The finite element method in engineering science. Moscow: Mir Publ.; 1975. (In Russ.)
  47. Strang G., Fix G.J. The finite element method in one dimension. An analysis of the finite element method. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1973. p. 51–62.
  48. Baykov V.N., Sigalov E.E. Reinforced concrete structures. General course. Moscow: Stroyizdat Publ.; 1991. (In Russ).
  49. Kuzhakhmetova E.R. Modeling of a piled foundation in a Femap with NX Nastran. Structural Mechanics of Engineering Constructions and Buildings. 2020;16(4):250–260. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.22363/1815-5235-2020-16-4-250-260
  50. Sutyrin V.I., Shinkarenko I.A., Kuzhakhmetova E.R. Experimental stand for determining the damping properties of materials. Izvestiya KSTU. 2019;52:177‒183. (In Russ.)
  51. Sutyrin V.I., Kuzhakhmetova E.R., Shinkarenko I.A. Experimental determination of soil damping coefficients. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 2022;(4):19‒25. (In Russ.)
  52. Sutyrin V.I., Kuzhakhmetova E.R., Shinkarenko I.A. Experimental determination of soil damping coefficients. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 2022;59:362–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-022-09823-6

Copyright (c) 2022 Kuzhakhmetova E.R., Sutyrin V.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies