Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Sliding Belt Seismic Isolation and Elastic Limiter of Horizontal Displacements
- Authors: Mkrtychev O.V.1, Mingazova S.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University)
- Issue: Vol 20, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 355-363
- Section: Seismic resistence
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/structural-mechanics/article/view/41545
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/1815-5235-2024-20-4-355-363
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UAZLMN
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
An effective way of ensuring seismic resistance of buildings and structures is the use of active seismic protection systems - seismic isolation. One known type of seismic isolation is a sliding belt at foundation level. However, the application of this seismic protection system is limited by the lack of necessary design justifications and studies. The behavior of a cast-in-situ reinforced concrete building with different number of storeys (5, 9, 16 floors) with sliding belt seismic isolation at foundation level containing fluoroplastic plates and an elastic limiter of horizontal displacements is considered. The main focus of the study is the effect of the size of the gap between the elastic limiter and the side faces of the upper foundation on the efficiency of the sliding belt. The analysis was carried out using the direct dynamic method. Comparative graphs of relative displacements and the stress intensity distributions for each calculation case are obtained. It is revealed that proximity of the elastic limiter to the foundation increases the likelihood of collision and the emergence of dangerous vibrations that can lead to the failure of the structure. The optimally selected gap size will allow the sliding belt to operate effectively, limiting excessive horizontal displacements, and reduce seismic loads on the superstructure.
Full Text
1. Introduction Seismic resistance of buildings and structures is an important aspect of engineering design and construction in earthquake-prone regions. With increasing urbanization and development of cities, involving construction in complex geological conditions, the problem of seismic resistance is becoming more and more relevant and important. Earthquakes can cause loss of life, destruction of infrastructure and significant economic losses, so it is important to ensure the safety and stability of buildings and structures against possible seismic impacts. Many experts around the world are actively engaged in research and development of methods and technologies in the field of earthquake-resistant construction, contributing to this important field. The research papers of Ya.M. Eisenberg [1], O.V. Mkrtychev [2], I. Mirzaev [3], V.I. Smirnov [4], N. Maureira-Carsalade [5], M. Erdik [6], P.M. Calvi [7] and others [8-16] consider methods of increasing earthquake resistance of buildings and structures using various types of active seismic protection systems, including sliding belt base isolation. The authors of papers [17-19] investigated the sensitivity of seismic isolation systems under different parameters of the external seismic loading and the structure, as well as the influence of seismic isolation parameters under the optimal design of structures. In [20-22] the issues of seismic isolation of nuclear power plants are considered. In [23; 24], the influence of damping and its parameters on the performance of seismic isolation was studied. The subject of this study is the performance of sliding belt base isolation with fluoroplastic plates (PTFE) during earthquake. The purpose of the study is to analyze the influence of the elastic limiter of horizontal displacements on the efficiency of the sliding belt base isolation. The main objectives of the study are: 1) development of a model of a cast-in-situ reinforced concrete building with sliding belt base isolation and an elastic limiter of horizontal displacements; 2) analysis of the cast-in-situ reinforced concrete building with sliding belt base isolation and an elastic limiter of horizontal displacements under an intense earthquake using the direct dynamic method; 3) examination of the results of the numerical study and evaluation of the influence of the elastic limiter on the efficiency of the sliding belt. 2. Method The behavior of a cast-in-situ reinforced concrete building of different storeys (5, 9, 16 floors) with sliding belt seismic isolation and an elastic limiter of horizontal displacements on a rigid base has been investigated (Figures 1, 2). Figure 1. Model of a 16-storey building with a sliding belt and an elastic limiter of horizontal displacements: 1 - cast-in-situ reinforced concrete building with upper foundation; 2 - contact surface (PTFE+PTFE); 3 - lower foundation on rigid base; 4 - elastic limiter of horizontal displacements (sand) S o u r c e: compiled by S.R. Mingazova in the LS-DYNA program Figure 2. Fragment of the finite element model S o u r c e: compiled by S.R. Mingazova in the LS-DYNA program A material combination of PTFE over PTFE with a sliding friction coefficient of µ = 0.05 is used as the friction minimization component. Compacted sand with the following mechanical characteristics is used as the elastic limiter of horizontal displacements: ρ = 1680 kg/m3, E = 100 MPa. The elastic limiter is installed along the perimeter of the upper foundation at a particular distance. The value of the distance from the side edges of the upper foundation to the side edges of the sand should be selected in such a way as to ensure the efficiency of the sliding belt on one hand, and on the other hand, to prevent large residual displacements that may adversely affect the structure, including service lines. In the course of the study, the cases when the distance between the sand and the upper foundation is 5, 10, 15, 20 cm were considered. The height and width of the sand is assumed to be 1 m. The concrete-sand sliding coefficient of friction is 0.3. The initial data of the considered cast-in-situ reinforced concrete buildings are given in [25-27]. The analysis was performed by the direct dynamic method in LS-DYNA software using explicit schemes of direct integration of the equation of motion. The nonlinear behavior of concrete (024 MAT PIECEWISE LINEAR PLASTICITY) and elastic behavior of sand (001 MAT ELASTIC) were adopted in the analysis [28]. The intensity of the earthquake is 9 on the MSK-64 scale. A rigid base problem in a non-inertial reference frame is considered. The external seismic loading is specified using the accelerogram of the ground surface, which is the result of the combined ground motion due to the incoming waves from the interior of the earth (longitudinal, transverse and surface waves). The equation of motion of a system with a finite number of degrees of freedom in this case is written in the following form [29]: [M U] &&r +[ ]С Ur& +[ ]K Ur = -[M]⋅ ⋅1r a t0( ), r where [M] is the mass matrix; [C] is the damping matrix; [К] is the stiffness matrix; U& is the vector of velocities of the concentrated masses; U&&r is the vector of accelerations of the concentrated masses; Ur is the vector of displacements of the concentrated masses; a t0( )is the acceleration of seismic motion. When analyzing a building with seismic isolation in the form of a sliding belt at the foundation level, it is necessary to take into account that, generally, the worst case for such structure is a low-frequency external seismic loading, which can, for example, lead to large residual displacements. Therefore, a twocomponent accelerogram with a dominant frequency of 1.04 Hz in the X-axis and 0.83 Hz in the Y-axis was considered as an external seismic load (Figures 3, 4). Time t, [s] Figure 3. Single-component earthquake accelerogram in Х direction for the 16-storey building S o u r c e: compiled by S.R. Mingazova in the LS-DYNA program Time t, [s] Figure 4. Single-component earthquake accelerogram in Y direction for the 16-storey building S o u r c e: compiled by S.R. Mingazova in the LS-DYNA program 3. Results and Discussion Below are comparative graphs of relative displacements of the 1st floor of the 5-storey building along the X and Y axis without seismic isolation, with seismic isolation and without elastic limiter, with seismic isolation and with an elastic limiter of horizontal displacements located at a distance of 5, 10, 15 cm (Figures 5, 6). It should be noted that in all figures for the 5-storey and 9-storey building there is no graph of relative displacement of the 1st floor in the case when the elastic limiter is installed at a distance of 20 cm from the side edges of the upper foundation, because the displacement of the upper foundation is less than this distance. This analysis case is similar to the case of a building with seismic isolation and without an elastic limiter. Figure 5. Displacement of the top of the 1st floor of the 5-storey building relative to its bottom along the X axis S o u r c e: compiled by S.R. Mingazova in the LS-DYNA program Figure 6. Displacement of the top of the 1st floor of the 5-storey building relative to its bottom along the Y axis S o u r c e: compiled by S.R. Mingazova in the LS-DYNA program Below are comparative graphs of relative displacements of the 1st floor of the 9-storey building along the X and Y axis without seismic isolation, with seismic isolation and without elastic limiter, with seismic isolation and with an elastic limiter at a distance of 5, 10, 15 cm (Figures 7, 8). Below are comparative graphs of relative displacements of the 1st floor of the 16-storey building along the X and Y axis without seismic isolation, with seismic isolation and without elastic limiter, with seismic isolation and with an elastic limiter at a distance of 5, 10, 15 cm (Figures 9, 10). Figure 7. Displacement of the top of the 1st floor of the 9-storey building relative to its bottom along the X axis S o u r c e: compiled by S.R. Mingazova in the LS-DYNA program Figure 8. Displacement of the top of the 1st floor of the 9-storey building relative to its bottom along the Y axis S o u r c e: compiled by S.R. Mingazova in the LS-DYNA program Figure 9. Displacement of the top of the 1st floor of the 16-storey building relative to its bottom along the X axis S o u r ce : compiled by S.R. Mingazova in the LS-DYNA program Figure 10. Displacement of the top of the 1st floor of the 16-storey building relative to its bottom along the X axis S o u r c e: compiled by S.R. Mingazova in the LS-DYNA program Figure 11 presents the stress intensity distributions for the 9-storey building with a PTFE sliding belt and an elastic limiter of horizontal displacements (at a distance of 5, 10, 15, 20 cm). a b c d Figure 11. Stress intensity distribution (in units of Pa) at time t =13.20 s of the 9-storey building with seismic isolation and elastic limiter of horizontal displacements at a distance of: a - 5 cm; b - 10 cm; c - 15 cm; d - 20 cm S o u r c e: compiled by S.R. Mingazova in the LS-DYNA program The analysis of the obtained results shows that at a distance of 5 cm between the sand and the upper foundation, the worst outcome - collapse - is observed for the 5- and 16-storey buildings. This is due to the fact that at the moment of impact of the upper foundation with the sand, strong vibrations of the building and large relative displacements occur. As the distance between the upper foundation and the elastic limiter increases, the probability of collision decreases. The farther away the elastic limiter is located, the smaller the building vibrations and relative displacements will be, which is observed in the results of the 5, 9-storey and 16-storey buildings. The case where the distance between the upper foundation and the elastic limiter is 20 cm is similar to the case without the elastic limiter, where the lowest relative displacement of the storey is observed. 4. Conclusion The following conclusions are made based on the obtained results: 1. If the elastic limiter is close to the foundation (5 cm), the probability of impact increases, causing dangerous vibrations and structural damage. 2. When selecting the optimal gap size, it is necessary to ensure that this distance facilitates the performance of the sliding belt on one hand and is not too large on the other hand. 3. Despite of the fact that it is quite obvious that when the elastic limiter is close to the foundation, the probability of impact increases, causing dangerous vibrations and failure, the conducted studies allow to determine the value of the most optimal gap, which would ensure the efficiency of the sliding belt, limit excessive horizontal displacements and at the same time would not be too large. 4. The results of the numerical study show that the position of the elastic limiter of horizontal displacements critically affects the performance of the seismic isolation. With an optimally selected gap, this type of seismic isolation significantly reduces seismic loads on the superstructure, which allows to increase its stability and safety during earthquake. The proposed analysis method of a cast-in-situ reinforced concrete building with seismic isolation by the direct dynamic method, based on explicit schemes of direct integration of the equation of motion, allows to obtain a solution in the time domain, taking into account the nonlinear behavior of the structure. The developed calculation method and research results can be used by design and research organizations in the construction of buildings and structures in earthquake-prone areas.About the authors
Oleg V. Mkrtychev
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: mkrtychev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2828-3693
SPIN-code: 9676-4986
Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Strength of Materials
Moscow, RussiaSalima R. Mingazova
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University)
Email: salima.mingazova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-3654-4038
SPIN-code: 7506-5852
Postgraduate student of the Department of Strength of Materials
Moscow, RussiaReferences
- Eisenberg Ya.M., Smirnov V.I. Seismic safety of structures and settlements. Innovative solutions. Urban planning. 2013;(1):57-64. (In Russ.) EDN: PYWRPV
- Mkrtychev O.V., Bubnov A.A. Features of calculating a seismically insulated building by displacement. Vestnik MGSU. 2014;(6):63-70. (In Russ.) EDN: SIJYDH
- Mirzaev I., Turdiev M. Vibrations of buildings with sliding foundations under real seismic effects. Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures. 2021;1(94):9407. https://doi.org/10.4123/CUBS.94.7
- Smirnov V.I. Application of innovative technologies of seismoisolation of buildings in seismic zone. Earthquake engineering. Constructions safety. 2009;(4):16-23. (In Russ.) EDN: QCLRRB
- Maureira-Carsalade N., Pardo E., Oyarzo-Vera C., Roco A. A roller type base isolation device with tensile strength. Engineering structures. 2020;221:111003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111003
- Erdik M., Ulker O., Sadan B, Tuzun C. Seismic isolation code developments and significant applications in Turkey. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering. 2018;115:413-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.009
- Paolo M. Calvi, Gian Michele Calvi. Historical development of friction-based seismic isolation systems. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering. 2018;106:14-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.003
- Takafumi Fujita Dr. Seismic isolation of civil buildings in Japan. Progress in structural engineering and materials. 2005;1(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.2260010311
- Zhou F.L. Seismic isolation of civil buildings in the People’s Republic of China. Progress in structural engineering and materials. 2001;3(3):268-276. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.85
- Avinash A.R., Krishnamoorthy A., Kamath K., Chaithra M. Sliding isolation systems: historical review, modeling techniques, and the contemporary trends. Buildings. 2022;12(11):8-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111997
- Asaad R., Kaadan A. Retrofitting existing masonry structures by using seismic base isolation system. Arabian journal for science and engineering. 2023;49:5243-5254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08381-9
- Warn G.P., Ryan K.L. A Review of seismic isolation for buildings: historical development and research needs. Buildings. 2012;(2):300-325. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/2/3/300
- Patil A.Y., Patil R.D. A review on seismic analysis of a multistoried steel building provided with different types of damper and base isolation. Asian journal of civil engineering. 2024;25:3277-3283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107023-00978-7
- Cardone D., Flora A., Gesualdi G. Inelastic response of RC frame buildings with seismic isolation. Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics. 2013;42(6):871-889. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2250
- Hou S., Chen Y., Wu H., Wang Z. Seismic isolation design and analysis of a complex medical building. Structural concrete. 2024;25(3):1495-1498. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202300832
- Banovic I., Radnic J., Grgic N., Matesan D. The use of limestone sand for the seismic base isolation of structures. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2018;(6):1-12 https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9734283
- Dushimimana A., Dushimimana C., Mbereyaho L., Niyonsenga A.A. Effects of building height and seismic load on the optimal performance of base isolation system. Arabian journal for science and engineering. 2023;48:13283-13302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-07660-9
- Leblouba M. Selection of seismic isolation system parameters for the near-optimal design of structures. Scientific Reports. 2022;12:14734. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19114-7
- Politopoulos I., Pham H. Sensitivity of seismically isolated structures. Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics. 2009;38(8):989-1007. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.879
- Whittaker A.S., Sollogoub P., Kim M.K. Seismic isolation of nuclear power plants: past, present and future. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2018;338:290-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.07.025
- Yu C.-C., Bolisetti C., Coleman J.L., Kosbab B., Whittaker A.S. Using seismic isolation to reduce risk and capital cost of safety-related nuclear structures. Nuclear engineering and design. 2018;326:268-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.11.016
- Lo Frano R. Benefits of seismic isolation for nuclear structures subjected to severe earthquake. Science and technology of nuclear installations. 2018;2018(1):8017394. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8017394
- Hall J.F. The role of damping in seismic isolation. Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics. 1999; 28(12):1717-1720. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199901)28:1<3::AID-EQE801>3.0.CO;2-D
- Du Y., Li H., Spencer B.F. Effect of non-proportional damping on seismic isolation. Journal of structural control. 2002;9(3):205-236. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.13
- Mkrtychev O., Mingazova S. Analysis of the reaction of reinforced concrete buildings with a varying number of stories with a seismic isolation sliding belt to an earthquake. IOP Conference series: materials science and engineering. 2020;869:052065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/869/5/052065
- Mkrtychev O., Mingazova S. Numerical analysis of antiseismic sliding belt performance. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. 2023;19(2):161-171. https://doi.org/10.22337/2587-9618-202319-2-161-171
- Mkrtychev O., Mingazova S. Study of the seismic isolation sliding belt: The case of a monolithic reinforced concrete building. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020;1425(1):012161. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1425/1/ 012161
- LS-DYNA. KEYWORD users manual. Volume I, II. Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC). P. 3186.
- Mkrtychev O.V., Jinchvelashvili G.A. Problems of accounting for nonlinearities in the theory of seismic resistance (hypotheses and misconceptions): monograph. Moscow: MGSU; 2014. (In Russ.) ISBN 978-5-7264-0801-9